Literature DB >> 1620566

Size-distance invariance: kinetic invariance is different from static invariance.

M Hershenson1.   

Abstract

The static form of the size-distance invariance hypothesis asserts that a given proximal stimulus size (visual angle) determines a unique and constant ratio of perceived object size to perceived object distance. A proposed kinetic invariance hypothesis asserts that a changing proximal stimulus size (an expanding or contracting solid visual angle) produces a constant perceived size and a changing perceived distance such that the instantaneous ratio of perceived size to perceived distance is determined by the instantaneous value of visual angle. The kinetic invariance hypothesis requires a new concept, an operating constraint, to mediate between the proximal expansion or contraction pattern and the perception of rigid object motion in depth. As a consequence of the operating constraint, expansion and contraction patterns are automatically represented in consciousness as rigid objects. In certain static situations, the operation of this constraint produces the anomalous perceived-size-perceived-distance relations called the size-distance paradox.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1620566     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  22 in total

1.  The Moon Illusion, II: The moon's apparent size is a function of the presence or absence of terrain.

Authors:  I Rock; L Kaufman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1962-06-22       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The Moon Illusion, I: Explanation of this phenomenon was sought through the use of artificial moons seen on the sky.

Authors:  L Kaufman; I Rock
Journal:  Science       Date:  1962-06-15       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Size as a cue to distance; radial motion.

Authors:  W H ITTELSON
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1951-04

4.  Familiar size and the theory of off-sized perceptions.

Authors:  W C Gogel; J A Da Silva
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-04

5.  Perceived size and motion in depth from optical expansion.

Authors:  M T Swanston; W C Gogel
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-05

6.  Emmert's laws. Size constancy vs. optical geometry.

Authors:  D J Weintraub; G T Gardner
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1970-03

7.  Moon illusion and spiral aftereffect: illusions due to the loom-zoom system?

Authors:  M Hershenson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1982-12

8.  Ecological constraints on internal representation: resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming.

Authors:  R N Shepard
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  On size, distance, and visual angle perception.

Authors:  D McCready
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-04

10.  A neglected problem: kinetic size constancy.

Authors:  K Noguchi; K Taya
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1981-08
View more
  2 in total

1.  The perception of shrinking in apparent motion.

Authors:  M Hershenson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-12

2.  The effects of familiar size and object trajectories on time-to-contact judgements.

Authors:  Simon G Hosking; Boris Crassini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 1.972

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.