Literature DB >> 11296504

Expertise and the perception of kinematic and situational probability information.

B Abernethy1, D P Gill, S L Parks, S T Packer.   

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted on the nature of expert perception in the sport of squash. In the first experiment, ten expert and fifteen novice players attempted to predict the direction and force of squash strokes from either a film display (occluded at variable time periods before and after the opposing player had struck the ball) or a matched point-light display (containing only the basic kinematic features of the opponent's movement pattern). Experts out-performed the novices under both display conditions, and the same basic time windows that characterised expert and novice pick-up of information in the film task also persisted in the point-light task. This suggests that the experts' perceptual advantage is directly related to their superior pick-up of essential kinematic information. In the second experiment, the vision of six expert and six less skilled players was occluded by remotely triggered liquid-crystal spectacles at quasi-random intervals during simulated match play. Players were required to complete their current stroke even when the display was occluded and their prediction performance was assessed with respect to whether they moved to the correct half of the court to match the direction and depth of the opponent's stroke. Consistent with experiment 1, experts were found to be superior in their advance pick-up of both directional and depth information when the display was occluded during the opponent's hitting action. However, experts also remained better than chance, and clearly superior to less skilled players, in their prediction performance under conditions where occlusion occurred before any significant pre-contact preparatory movement by the opposing player was visible. This additional source of expert superiority is attributable to their superior attunement to the information contained in the situational probabilities and sequential dependences within their opponent's pattern of play.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11296504     DOI: 10.1068/p2872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  45 in total

1.  The effects of familiar size and object trajectories on time-to-contact judgements.

Authors:  Simon G Hosking; Boris Crassini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Does the Level of Graphical Detail of a Virtual Handball Thrower Influence a Goalkeeper's Motor Response?

Authors:  Nicolas Vignais; Benoit Bideau; Cathy Craig; Sébastien Brault; Franck Multon; Paul Delamarche; Richard Kulpa
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Modification of agility running technique in reaction to a defender in rugby union.

Authors:  Keane W Wheeler; Mark G L Sayers
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Prediction of human actions: expertise and task-related effects on neural activation of the action observation network.

Authors:  Nils Balser; Britta Lorey; Sebastian Pilgramm; Rudolf Stark; Matthias Bischoff; Karen Zentgraf; Andrew Mark Williams; Jörn Munzert
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Comparison of visual acuity in reduced lumination and facility of ocular accommodation in table tennis champions and non- players.

Authors:  Ebrahim Jafarzadehpur; Mohammad R Yarigholi
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  Both right- and left-handers show a bias to attend others' right arm.

Authors:  Daniele Marzoli; Chiara Lucafò; Alessandra Pagliara; Romina Cappuccio; Alfredo Brancucci; Luca Tommasi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Subtle predictive movements reveal actions regardless of social context.

Authors:  Emalie G McMahon; Charles Y Zheng; Francisco Pereira; Ray Gonzalez; Leslie G Ungerleider; Maryam Vaziri-Pashkam
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Cooperation or competition? Discriminating between social intentions by observing prehensile movements.

Authors:  Valeria Manera; Cristina Becchio; Andrea Cavallo; Luisa Sartori; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  The science of badminton: game characteristics, anthropometry, physiology, visual fitness and biomechanics.

Authors:  Michael Phomsoupha; Guillaume Laffaye
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 10.  Understanding a Player's Decision-Making Process in Team Sports: A Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence.

Authors:  Michael Ashford; Andrew Abraham; Jamie Poolton
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.