Literature DB >> 20440166

The use of microplates for internal fixation of mandibular fractures.

Jin Sik Burm1, Juliana E Hansen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of microplates in mandible fractures is not widely accepted, although microplate systems are commonly used for treatment of maxillofacial fractures. This study evaluated the use of microplates for internal fixation of mandibular fractures with no comminution or bony defects.
METHODS: Thirty-five patients with mandibular fractures (26 double and nine single) were treated. Of the 61 fractures, 54 were stabilized using 0.55-mm-thick microplates and 1.2-mm monocortical microscrews. The fractures were exposed through either an intraoral or a percutaneous approach. In general, two-point fixation with two microplates or one microplate and wires was performed. Interdental wiring was added for symphyseal or body fractures to confer further stability onto the dental arch. No intermaxillary fixation was used.
RESULTS: During a follow-up period ranging from 3 to 29 months, all fractures showed complete bone healing. There were eight complications in seven patients with a double fracture, including mild malocclusion (n = 3), paresthesia (n = 3), asymptomatic delayed union (n = 1), and asymptomatic plate fracture (n = 1). No further orthodontic or surgical treatment was performed as a result of these complications. No other complications requiring further treatment occurred. There were three residual complications of mild malocclusion, paresthesia, and asymptomatic plate fracture at final follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that two-point fixation with microplates is appropriate for the internal fixation of simple, isolated mandibular fractures. Its advantages include a high adaptability to the fracture site, occlusal self-adjustment, a minimal mass effect, and a relatively strong holding power of two-point fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20440166     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d51244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of a new optical measuring system for experiments on fractured human mandibles: a biomechanical feasibility study in maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  T Steiner; S Raith; S Eichhorn; S Doebele; S Trainotti; S Müller; M Eder; L Kovacs; R Burgkart; K-D Wolff; F Hölzle
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Role of 1.5 mm microplates in treatment of symphyseal fracture of mandible: A stress analysis based comparative study.

Authors:  Syed S Ahmed; Siddharth Bhardwaj; Md Kalim Ansari; Omar Farooq; Abid Ali Khan
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2017-04-14

3.  Efficacy of Microplates versus Miniplates in the Management of Maxillofacial Fractures.

Authors:  Gaurav Mittal; Anmol Agarwal; Ritesh Garg; Siddharth Sharma; Abhishek Rathi; Pooja Kapse
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-06-08

4.  Multi-institutional Analysis of Surgical Management and Outcomes of Mandibular Fracture Repair in Adults.

Authors:  Dmitry Zavlin; Kevin T Jubbal; Anthony Echo; Shayan A Izaddoost; Jeffrey D Friedman; Olushola Olorunnipa
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2017-06-08

5.  A 4-Year Multicentre Audit of Complications Following ORIF Treatment of Mandibular Fractures.

Authors:  Sathesh Balasundram; Ferdinand J Kovilpillai; Stephen J Royan; Bee Chai Ma; Dharmindra Rajah Gunarajah; Tassha Hilda Adnan
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2019-02-25

6.  Comparison of biting force when using a combination of one microplate and one miniplate versus two miniplates for fixation of parasymphyseal mandibular fracture: the use of microplates for parasymphyseal mandibular fracture.

Authors:  Magdy Mohamed Zaky; Nabila Ali Fayed; Mohamed Farid Shehab
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-11-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.