Literature DB >> 20439334

Clinician gate-keeping in clinical research is not ethically defensible: an analysis.

Kerith Sharkey1, Julian Savulescu, Sanchia Aranda, Penelope Schofield.   

Abstract

Clinician gate-keeping is the process whereby healthcare providers prevent access to eligible patients for research recruitment. This paper contends that clinician gate-keeping violates three principles that underpin international ethical guidelines: respect for persons or autonomy; beneficence or a favourable balance of risks and potential benefits; and justice or a fair distribution of the benefits and burdens of research. In order to stimulate further research and debate, three possible strategies are also presented to eliminate gate-keeping: partnership with professional researchers; collaborative research design and clinician education.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20439334     DOI: 10.1136/jme.2009.031716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  18 in total

Review 1.  Cancer patient decision making related to clinical trial participation: an integrative review with implications for patients' relational autonomy.

Authors:  Jennifer A H Bell; Lynda G Balneaves
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-01-17       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Ethics of drug research in the pediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  Niina Kleiber; Krista Tromp; Miriam G Mooij; Suzanne van de Vathorst; Dick Tibboel; Saskia N de Wildt
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.022

3.  Analysis and validation of a Parkinson's disease register as a recruitment tool for clinical studies.

Authors:  Camille Carroll; Amy Palmer; Christine Cosby; John Zajicek
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.659

4.  Development of the FORUM: a new patient and clinician reported outcome measure for forensic mental health services.

Authors:  Howard Ryland; Jonathan Cook; Rob Ferris; Sarah Markham; Christian Sales; Raymond Fitzpatrick; Seena Fazel
Journal:  Psychol Crime Law       Date:  2021-08-23

5.  Including migrant oncology patients in research: A multisite pilot randomised controlled trial testing consultation audio-recordings and question prompt lists.

Authors:  Amelia Hyatt; Ruby Lipson-Smith; Karla Gough; Phyllis Butow; Michael Jefford; Thomas F Hack; Sandra Hale; Emiliano Zucchi; Shane White; Uldis Ozolins; Penelope Schofield
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2022-05-28

6.  Understanding the perspectives of recruiters is key to improving randomised controlled trial enrolment: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Nicola Farrar; Daisy Elliott; Catherine Houghton; Marcus Jepson; Nicola Mills; Sangeetha Paramasivan; Lucy Plumb; Julia Wade; Bridget Young; Jenny L Donovan; Leila Rooshenas
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 2.728

7.  Struggling for existence-Life situation experiences of older persons with mental disorders.

Authors:  Gunilla Martinsson; Ingegerd Fagerberg; Christina Lindholm; Lena Wiklund-Gustin
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2012-06-07

8.  Inviting parents to take part in paediatric palliative care research: a mixed-methods examination of selection bias.

Authors:  Joanna C Crocker; Emma Beecham; Paula Kelly; Andrew P Dinsdale; June Hemsley; Louise Jones; Myra Bluebond-Langner
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 4.762

9.  A qualitative study on acceptable levels of risk for pregnant women in clinical research.

Authors:  Indira S E van der Zande; Rieke van der Graaf; Martijn A Oudijk; Johannes J M van Delden
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 2.652

10.  Cancer patients' willingness to answer survey questions about life expectancy.

Authors:  L J Mackenzie; M L Carey; R W Sanson-Fisher; C A D'Este; A E Hall
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.