Literature DB >> 36157331

Development of the FORUM: a new patient and clinician reported outcome measure for forensic mental health services.

Howard Ryland1, Jonathan Cook2, Rob Ferris3, Sarah Markham4, Christian Sales5, Raymond Fitzpatrick6, Seena Fazel1.   

Abstract

Forensic mental health services provide care to people in secure psychiatric hospitals and via specialised community teams. Such services are typically low volume and high cost, often highly restrictive and average duration of inpatient care prior to discharge is long. Measuring outcomes of care is important to safeguard patients and the public, monitor progress, inform treatment plans and assist in service evaluation and planning. We describe the development in England of a new outcome measure for forensic mental health services. Patient interviews and multistakeholder focus groups were held to elicit key concepts. Thematic analysis was used to develop an outcomes framework. Fifteen patients participated in the interviews and 48 stakeholders in the focus groups. Six domains were identified in thematic analysis: 'about me, my quality of life, my health, my safety and risk, my life skills and my progress'. Sixty-two stakeholders participated in the first round of the Delphi process, and 49 completed round two. Eight of the top fifteen outcomes were shared between patients/carers and professionals. Based on these results, a new outcome measure, the FORensic oUtcome Measure (FORUM), was developed including both a patient reported and clinician reported measure. Further assessment of the FORUM's use to track patients' progress over time, and facilitate shared decision-making and care planning, is required.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CROM; Delphi; Outcomes; PROM; forensic

Year:  2021        PMID: 36157331      PMCID: PMC7613634          DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2021.1962873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Crime Law        ISSN: 1068-316X


  38 in total

1.  Optimal recall length in survey design.

Authors:  Philip M Clarke; Denzil G Fiebig; Ulf-G Gerdtham
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  The reliability and validity of the forensic Camberwell Assessment of Need (CANFOR): a needs assessment for forensic mental health service users.

Authors:  Stuart D M Thomas; Mike Slade; Paul McCrone; Mari-Anne Harty; Janet Parrott; Graham Thornicroft; Morven Leese
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.035

3.  Transcending the Profession: Psychiatric Patients' Experiences of Trust in Clinicians.

Authors:  Mira D Vale; Mary-Jo DelVecchio Good
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2020-05-05

4.  Clinician gate-keeping in clinical research is not ethically defensible: an analysis.

Authors:  Kerith Sharkey; Julian Savulescu; Sanchia Aranda; Penelope Schofield
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  European Psychiatric Association (EPA) guidance on forensic psychiatry: Evidence based assessment and treatment of mentally disordered offenders.

Authors:  Birgit A Völlm; Martin Clarke; Vicenç Tort Herrando; Allan O Seppänen; Paweł Gosek; Janusz Heitzman; Erik Bulten
Journal:  Eur Psychiatry       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 5.361

6.  Community forensic psychiatric services in England and Wales.

Authors:  Richard Latham; Hannah Kate Williams
Journal:  CNS Spectr       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 3.790

7.  The DUNDRUM Quartet: validation of structured professional judgement instruments DUNDRUM-3 assessment of programme completion and DUNDRUM-4 assessment of recovery in forensic mental health services.

Authors:  Sarah O'Dwyer; Mary Davoren; Zareena Abidin; Elaine Doyle; Kim McDonnell; Harry G Kennedy
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2011-07-03

8.  Public involvement in health outcomes research: lessons learnt from the development of the recovering quality of life (ReQoL) measures.

Authors:  Andrew Grundy; Anju Devianee Keetharuth; Rosemary Barber; Jill Carlton; Janice Connell; Elizabeth Taylor Buck; Michael Barkham; Thomas Ricketts; Dan Robotham; Diana Rose; John Kay; Rob Hanlon; John Brazier
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Long-stay in forensic-psychiatric care in the UK.

Authors:  Laurie Hare Duke; Vivek Furtado; Boliang Guo; Birgit Angela Völlm
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 4.328

10.  Forensic mental health in Europe: some key figures.

Authors:  Jack Tomlin; Ilaria Lega; Peter Braun; Harry G Kennedy; Vicente Tort Herrando; Ricardo Barroso; Luca Castelletti; Fiorino Mirabella; Franco Scarpa; Birgit Völlm
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 4.328

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.