Literature DB >> 20436810

Sorry, You Can't Have That Information: Data Holder Confusion Regarding Privacy Requirements for Personal Health Information and the Potential Chilling Effect on Health Research.

Daryl Pullman1, Sharon K Buehler, Larry Felt, Katherine Gallagher, Jeannie House, T Montgomery Keough, Lucy McDonald, Angela Power, Ann Ryan.   

Abstract

This study, conducted in Newfoundland and Labrador, assessed the level of awareness, perceptions and concerns of healthcare providers, health researchers, data managers and the general public about the collection, use and disclosure of personal health information (PHI) for research purposes. Data collection involved surveys and follow-up focus groups with participants. Results indicate a poor understanding generally with regard to privacy rights and responsibilities. Many professionals are unfamiliar with the legislative environment for PHI, particularly as it pertains to the access and use of PHI for research purposes. Lack of familiarity with basic requirements for patient-based research, coupled with heightened sensitivity to privacy issues owing to various federal and provincial regulatory initiatives, could have a chilling effect on health research. Importantly, our results indicate that the public is much less concerned about the use of their PHI for health research purposes than are professionals who collect, store and share it.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20436810      PMCID: PMC2700705     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthc Policy        ISSN: 1715-6572


  11 in total

Review 1.  Why we should not seek individual informed consent for participation in health services research.

Authors:  J Cassell; A Young
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 2.  The new HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996) Medical Privacy Rule: help or hindrance for clinical research?

Authors:  Jennifer Kulynych; David Korn
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-08-26       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Extracting information from hospital records: what patients think about consent.

Authors:  Bruce Campbell; Helen Thomson; Jessica Slater; Colin Coward; Katrina Wyatt; Kieran Sweeney
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2007-12

4.  Patient privacy. Rule to protect records may doom long-term heart study.

Authors:  Jocelyn Kaiser
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Legal and ethical considerations in processing patient-identifiable data without patient consent: lessons learnt from developing a disease register.

Authors:  Charlotte L Haynes; Gary A Cook; Michael A Jones
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  The dysregulation of human subjects research.

Authors:  Norman Fost; Robert J Levine
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Effect of different forms of information produced for cancer patients on their use of the information, social support, and anxiety: randomised trial.

Authors:  R B Jones; J Pearson; A J Cawsey; D Bental; A Barrett; J White; C A White; W H Gilmour
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-04-05

8.  Patients' opinions on privacy, consent and the disclosure of health information for medical research.

Authors:  Stacey A Page; Ian Mitchell
Journal:  Chronic Dis Can       Date:  2006

9.  Influence of the HIPAA Privacy Rule on health research.

Authors:  Roberta B Ness
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Access to medical records for research purposes: varying perceptions across research ethics boards.

Authors:  D J Willison; C Emerson; K V Szala-Meneok; E Gibson; L Schwartz; K M Weisbaum; F Fournier; K Brazil; M D Coughlin
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.903

View more
  2 in total

1.  Joint replacement recipients' views about health information privacy.

Authors:  Amanda L Terry; Bert M Chesworth; Robert B Bourne; Paul Stolee; Mark Speechley
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Impact of organizational and individual factors on patient-provider relationships: A national survey of doctors, nurses and patients in China.

Authors:  Ping Zhang; Fang Wang; Yao Cheng; Liu Yi Zhang; Bei Zhu Ye; Hong Wei Jiang; Yi Sun; Xi Zhu; Yuan Liang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.