Literature DB >> 12356960

Why we should not seek individual informed consent for participation in health services research.

J Cassell1, A Young.   

Abstract

Ethics committees now require that individuals give informed consent to much health services research, in the same way as for clinical research. This is misguided. Existing ethical guidelines do not help us decide how to seek consent in these cases, and have allowed managerial experimentation to remain largely unchecked. Inappropriate requirements for individual consent can institutionalise health inequalities and reduce access to services for vulnerable groups. This undermines the fundamental purpose of the National Health Service (NHS), and ignores our rights and duties as its members, explored here. Alternative forms of community consent should be actively pursued.

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Biomedical and Behavioral Research; National Health Service

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12356960      PMCID: PMC1733638          DOI: 10.1136/jme.28.5.313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  19 in total

Review 1.  The home treatment enigma.

Authors:  M G Smyth; J Hoult
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-29

2.  A practical guide to informed consent to treatment.

Authors:  A D Oxman; I Chalmers; D L Sackett
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001 Dec 22-29

3.  Consent, confidentiality, and the threat to public health surveillance.

Authors:  Chris Verity; Angus Nicoll
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-05-18

4.  Psychiatric home treatment. Vigorous, well designed trials are needed.

Authors:  T Burns
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-07-15

Review 5.  Science, ethics, and the future of research into maternal infant transmission of HIV-1. Perinatal HIV Intervention Research in Developing Countries Workshop participants.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-03-06       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Primary and secondary care management of women with early breast cancer from affluent and deprived areas: retrospective review of hospital and general practice records.

Authors:  U Macleod; S Ross; C Twelves; W D George; C Gillis; G C Watt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-05-27

7.  Team midwife care: maternal and infant outcomes.

Authors:  U Waldenström; H McLachlan; D Forster; S Brennecke; S Brown
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.100

8.  Toward a comparison of survival in American and European cancer patients.

Authors:  G Gatta; R Capocaccia; M P Coleman; L A Gloeckler Ries; T Hakulinen; A Micheli; M Sant; A Verdecchia; F Berrino
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Understanding variations in survival for colorectal cancer in Europe: a EUROCARE high resolution study.

Authors:  G Gatta; R Capocaccia; M Sant; C M Bell; J W Coebergh; R A Damhuis; J Faivre; C Martinez-Garcia; J Pawlega; M Ponz de Leon; D Pottier; N Raverdy; E M Williams; F Berrino
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Genitourinary medicine services in the United Kingdom are failing to meet current demand.

Authors:  T Djuretic; M Catchpole; J S Bingham; A Robinson; G Hughes; G Kinghorn
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.359

View more
  29 in total

1.  Difficulties in giving fully informed consent.

Authors:  Ruth G Jepson; Roma Robertson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-05-10

2.  Solidarity: a (new) ethic for global health policy.

Authors:  Shawn H E Harmon
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2006-12

3.  Aspects of informed consent in medical practice in the eastern Mediterranean region during the 17th and 18th centuries.

Authors:  Platon Christopoulos; Matthew E Falagas; Philippos Gourzis; Constantinos Trompoukis
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Sorry, You Can't Have That Information: Data Holder Confusion Regarding Privacy Requirements for Personal Health Information and the Potential Chilling Effect on Health Research.

Authors:  Daryl Pullman; Sharon K Buehler; Larry Felt; Katherine Gallagher; Jeannie House; T Montgomery Keough; Lucy McDonald; Angela Power; Ann Ryan
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2009-05

5.  Ethics and Phishing Experiments.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Peter R Finn
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Informed consent in community-based oral health research.

Authors:  Shenuka Singh
Journal:  J Forensic Odontostomatol       Date:  2014-11-30

7.  Can we evaluate population screening strategies in UK general practice? A pilot randomised controlled trial comparing postal and opportunistic screening for genital chlamydial infection.

Authors:  Abiola Senok; Phil Wilson; Margaret Reid; Anne Scoular; Neil Craig; Alex McConnachie; Bridie Fitzpatrick; Alison MacDonald
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Maintaining patient access to GUM clinics: is it compatible with appointments?

Authors:  J A Cassell; M G Brook; C H Mercer; S Murphy; A M Johnson
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.519

9.  Ethical issues in public health: a qualitative study of public health practice in Scotland.

Authors:  W A Rogers
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  The ethics of health systems research in low- and middle-income countries: a call to action.

Authors:  Adnan A Hyder; Bridget Pratt; Joseph Ali; Nancy Kass; Nelson Sewankambo
Journal:  Glob Public Health       Date:  2014-08-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.