Literature DB >> 20435854

Single-beat versus multibeat real-time 3D echocardiography for assessing left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: a comparison study with cardiac magnetic resonance.

Laurent Macron1, Pascal Lim, Alexandre Bensaid, Julien Nahum, Caroline Dussault, Laurens Mitchell-Heggs, Jean-Luc Dubois-Randé, Jean-François Deux, Pascal Gueret.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) is superior to 2D echocardiography in assessing left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction (EF), but its feasibility is limited by multibeat acquisition, which requires an optimal breath-hold and a regular heart rhythm. We sought to evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of single- and 2-beat RT3DE for LV volume and EF assessment. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Sixty-six consecutive patients referred for cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) underwent RT3DE and CMR on the same day. Of the 50 patients (age, 59+/-18 years; 68%men; 42% coronary artery disease; LVEF=49+/-14%; limits, 14% to 76%) with an adequate RT3DE image quality, accuracy for LV volumes and EF measurements of single- and 2-beat modalities were compared with the conventional 4-beat acquisition and CMR. Correlations with CMR for LV end-diastolic volume (161+/-59 mL, r=0.93 to 0.94) and end-systolic volume (86+/-56 mL, r=0.93 to 0.96) were excellent regardless of the number of cardiac cycles used. However, because of the low temporal resolution (7+/-2 volumes per second), single-beat underestimated LVEF (bias, -5+/-8%) with greater bias than 2-beat (bias, 1+/-6%, P<0.001) and 4-beat (bias, 3+/-7%, P<0.001) modalities. Interestingly, 2-beat provided accuracy similar to 4-beat for end-diastolic volume (bias, -17+/-21 mL versus -15+/-23 mL), end-systolic volume (bias, -9+/-16 mL versus -12+/-17 mL), and LVEF (bias, 1+/-6% versus 3+/-7%) measurements, but fewer stitching artifacts were observed with 2- than 4-beat modalities (3% versus 30%).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with conventional multibeat acquisitions, 2-beat modality provides similar accuracy in LV volume and EF measurements and should be preferred due to fewer stitching artifacts. In contrast, the temporal resolution of single-beat modality appears insufficient to provide an accurate estimation of LVEF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20435854     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.925966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1941-9651            Impact factor:   7.792


  17 in total

1.  Real-time three-dimensional left ventricular contraction in patients with diastolic dysfunction.

Authors:  Suzan Hatipoğlu; Gamze Babur Güler; Özgür Kaya; Gökhan Kahveci; Ekrem Güler; Elif Eroğlu; Nihal Özdemir
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 1.314

2.  [Echocardiographic evaluation of systolic left ventricular function in heart failure: value of alternative parameters for determination of ejection fraction].

Authors:  V Dornberger; H D Dittrich; R Busch
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.443

3.  Assessment of the accuracy of common clinical thresholds for cardiac morphology and function by transthoracic echocardiography.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Alexis; Benedict Costello; Leah M Iles; Andris H Ellims; James L Hare; Andrew J Taylor
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2016-11-05

Review 4.  Comparison of Echocardiography, Cardiac Magnetic Resonance, and Computed Tomographic Imaging for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Myocardial Function: Part 1 (Global Assessment).

Authors:  Menhel Kinno; Prashant Nagpal; Stephen Horgan; Alfonso H Waller
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Evaluation of right ventricular function using single-beat three-dimensional echocardiography in neonate.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Watanabe; Ikuo Hashimoto; Keijiro Ibuki; Mako Okabe; Hisashi Kaneda; Fukiko Ichida
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  The Role of Automated 3D Echocardiography for Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Assessment.

Authors:  Ernest Spitzer; Ben Ren; Felix Zijlstra; Nicolas M Van Mieghem; Marcel L Geleijnse
Journal:  Card Fail Rev       Date:  2017-11

7.  Sources of variation and bias in assessing left ventricular volumes and dyssynchrony using three-dimensional echocardiography.

Authors:  Denisa Muraru; Luigi P Badano; Davide Ermacora; Gianluca Piccoli; Sabino Iliceto
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Hcc-1 is a novel component of the nuclear matrix with growth inhibitory function.

Authors:  C L Leaw; E C Ren; M L Choong
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 9.261

9.  Real-time magnetic resonance imaging technique for determining left ventricle pressure-volume loops.

Authors:  Walter R T Witschey; Francisco Contijoch; Jeremy R McGarvey; Victor A Ferrari; Michael S Hansen; Madonna E Lee; Satoshi Takebayashi; Chikashi Aoki; Julio A Chirinos; Paul A Yushkevich; Joseph H Gorman; James J Pilla; Robert C Gorman
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 10.  Performance of 3-dimensional echocardiography in measuring left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jennifer L Dorosz; Dennis C Lezotte; David A Weitzenkamp; Larry A Allen; Ernesto E Salcedo
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 24.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.