Literature DB >> 20434603

Cyclic functional electrical stimulation does not enhance gains in hand grasp function when used as an adjunct to onabotulinumtoxinA and task practice therapy: a single-blind, randomized controlled pilot study.

Douglas J Weber1, Elizabeth R Skidmore, Christian Niyonkuru, Chia-Lin Chang, Lynne M Huber, Michael C Munin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether onabotulinumtoxinA injections and task practice training with or without functional electrical stimulation (FES) improve upper limb motor function in chronic spastic hemiparesis.
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: Outpatient spasticity clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (N=23) had chronic spastic hemiparesis with moderate-severe hand impairment based on Chedoke-McMaster Assessment greater than or equal to 2.
INTERVENTIONS: OnabotulinumtoxinA injections followed by 12 weeks of postinjection task practice. Participants randomly assigned to FES group were also fitted with an orthosis that provided FES. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Motor Activity Log (MAL)-Observation was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) and MAL-Self-Report.
RESULTS: For the entire cohort, MAL-Observation mean item scores improved significantly from baseline to week 6 (P=.005) but did not remain significant at week 12. MAL-Self-Report mean item scores improved significantly (P=.009) from baseline to week 6 and remained significantly higher (P=.014) at week 12. ARAT total scores also improved significantly from baseline to week 6 (P=.018) and were sustained at week 12 (P=.032). However, there were no significant differences between the FES and no-FES groups for any outcome variable over time.
CONCLUSIONS: Rehabilitation strategies that combine onabotulinumtoxinA injections and task practice therapy are feasible and effective in improving upper-limb motor function and reducing spasticity in patients with chronic spastic hemiparesis. However, the cyclic FES protocol used in this study did not increase gains achieved with the combination of onabotulinumtoxinA and task practice alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20434603      PMCID: PMC2880820          DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  31 in total

Review 1.  Upper extremity applications of functional neuromuscular stimulation.

Authors:  C Billian; P H Gorman
Journal:  Assist Technol       Date:  1992

2.  Nerve stimulation boosts botulinum toxin action in spasticity.

Authors:  Emma Frasson; Alberto Priori; Barbara Ruzzante; Giuseppe Didonè; Laura Bertolasi
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 10.338

3.  Neuromuscular stimulation for upper extremity motor and functional recovery in acute hemiplegia.

Authors:  J Chae; F Bethoux; T Bohine; L Dobos; T Davis; A Friedl
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of upper extremity spasticity: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  D M Simpson; D N Alexander; C F O'Brien; M Tagliati; A S Aswad; J M Leon; J Gibson; J M Mordaunt; E P Monaghan
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Motor cortex excitability following repetitive electrical stimulation of the common peroneal nerve depends on the voluntary drive.

Authors:  Svetlana Khaslavskaia; Thomas Sinkjaer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Clinimetric properties of the motor activity log for the assessment of arm use in hemiparetic patients.

Authors:  J H van der Lee; H Beckerman; D L Knol; H C W de Vet; L M Bouter
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study.

Authors:  H Nakayama; H S Jørgensen; H O Raaschou; T S Olsen
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment.

Authors:  C Gowland; P Stratford; M Ward; J Moreland; W Torresin; S Van Hullenaar; J Sanford; S Barreca; B Vanspall; N Plews
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Randomized clinical trial of therapeutic exercise in subacute stroke.

Authors:  Pamela Duncan; Stephanie Studenski; Lorie Richards; Steven Gollub; Sue Min Lai; Dean Reker; Subashan Perera; Joni Yates; Victoria Koch; Sally Rigler; Dallas Johnson
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2003-08-14       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Novel approach to the application of botulinum toxin to the flexor digitorum superficialis muscle in acquired brain injury.

Authors:  Michael C Munin; Brinda K Navalgund; Donna A Levitt; Terry P Breisinger; Ross D Zafonte
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Rehabilitation robotics.

Authors:  H I Krebs; B T Volpe
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2013

Review 2.  Valid and reliable instruments for arm-hand assessment at ICF activity level in persons with hemiplegia: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ryanne J M Lemmens; Annick A A Timmermans; Yvonne J M Janssen-Potten; Rob J E M Smeets; Henk A M Seelen
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 2.474

Review 3.  OnabotulinumtoxinA muscle injection patterns in adult spasticity: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Luba Nalysnyk; Spyridon Papapetropoulos; Philip Rotella; Jason C Simeone; Katharine E Alter; Alberto Esquenazi
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 2.474

4.  Combined Effects of Isokinetic Training and Botulinum Toxin Type A on Spastic Equinus Foot in Patients with Chronic Stroke: A Pilot, Single-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Nicoletta Cinone; Sara Letizia; Luigi Santoro; Salvatore Facciorusso; Raffaella Armiento; Alessandro Picelli; Maurizio Ranieri; Andrea Santamato
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 4.546

Review 5.  Botulinum Toxin Therapy Combined with Rehabilitation for Stroke: A Systematic Review of Effect on Motor Function.

Authors:  Takatoshi Hara; Ryo Momosaki; Masachika Niimi; Naoki Yamada; Hiroyoshi Hara; Masahiro Abo
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 4.546

6.  Effects of a 6-month self-rehabilitation programme in addition to botulinum toxin injections and conventional physiotherapy on limitations of patients with spastic hemiparesis following stroke (ADJU-TOX): protocol study for a randomised controlled, investigator blinded study.

Authors:  Celine Bonnyaud; Philippe Gallien; Pierre Decavel; Philippe Marque; Claire Aymard; Frédéric Pellas; Marie-Eve Isner; François Constant Boyer; François Muller; Jean-Christophe Daviet; Patrick Dehail; Brigitte Perrouin-Verbe; Nicolas Bayle; Emmanuel Coudeyre; Dominic Perennou; Isabelle Laffont; Jacques Ropers; Nabila-Yasmine Domingo-Saidji; Djamel Bensmail; Nicolas Roche
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Botulinum Toxin Injections and Electrical Stimulation for Spastic Paresis Improve Active Hand Function Following Stroke.

Authors:  Jong-Min Lee; Jean-Michel Gracies; Si-Bog Park; Kyu Hoon Lee; Ji Yeong Lee; Joon-Ho Shin
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 4.546

8.  A practical guide to optimizing the benefits of post-stroke spasticity interventions with botulinum toxin A: An international group consensus.

Authors:  Gerard E Francisco; Alexander Balbert; Ganesh Bavikatte; Djamel Bensmail; Stefano Carda; Thierry Deltombe; Nathalie Draulans; Steven Escaldi; Raphael Gross; Jorge Jacinto; Nicholas Ketchum; Franco Molteni; Susana Moraleda; Michael W ODell; Rajiv Reebye; Patrik Säterö; Monica Verduzco-Gutierrez; Heather Walker; Jörg Wissel
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.912

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.