Literature DB >> 15087552

Clinimetric properties of the motor activity log for the assessment of arm use in hemiparetic patients.

J H van der Lee1, H Beckerman, D L Knol, H C W de Vet, L M Bouter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The Motor Activity Log (MAL) is a semistructured interview for hemiparetic stroke patients to assess the use of their paretic arm and hand (amount of use [AOU]) and quality of movement [QOM]) during activities of daily living. Scores range from 0 to 5. The following clinimetric properties of the MAL were quantified: internal consistency (Cronbach alpha), test-retest agreement (Bland and Altman method), cross-sectional construct validity (correlation between AOU and QOM and with the Action Research Arm [ARA] test), longitudinal construct validity (correlation of change on the MAL during the intervention with a global change rating [GCR] and with change on the ARA), and responsiveness (effect size).
METHODS: Two baseline measurements 2 weeks apart and 1 follow-up measurement immediately after 2 weeks of intensive exercise therapy either with or without immobilization of the unimpaired arm (forced use) were performed in 56 chronic stroke patients.
RESULTS: Internal consistency was high (AOU: alpha=0.88; QOM: alpha=0.91). The limits of agreement were -0.70 to 0.85 and -0.61 to 0.71 for AOU and QOM, respectively. The correlation with the ARA score (Spearman rho) was 0.63 (AOU and QOM). However, the improvement on the MAL during the intervention was only weakly related to the GCR and to the improvement on the ARA, Spearman rho was between 0.16 and 0.22. The responsiveness ratio was 1.9 (AOU) and 2.0 (QOM).
CONCLUSIONS: The MAL is internally consistent and relatively stable in chronic stroke patients not undergoing an intervention. The cross-sectional construct validity of the MAL is reasonable, but the results raise doubt about its longitudinal construct validity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15087552     DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000126900.24964.7e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  98 in total

1.  Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Compared to Dose-Matched Interventions for Upper-Limb Dysfunction in Adult Survivors of Stroke: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ted Stevenson; Leyda Thalman; Heather Christie; William Poluha
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  Minimal detectable change of the actual amount of use test and the motor activity log: the EXCITE Trial.

Authors:  Shuya Chen; Steven L Wolf; Qin Zhang; Paul A Thompson; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 3.  Effects of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation in stroke patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rachele Bertani; Corrado Melegari; Maria C De Cola; Alessia Bramanti; Placido Bramanti; Rocco Salvatore Calabrò
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 4.  Functional recovery following stroke: capturing changes in upper-extremity function.

Authors:  Lisa A Simpson; Janice J Eng
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 3.919

5.  Stimulation targeting higher motor areas in stroke rehabilitation: A proof-of-concept, randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled study of effectiveness and underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  David A Cunningham; Nicole Varnerin; Andre Machado; Corin Bonnett; Daniel Janini; Sarah Roelle; Kelsey Potter-Baker; Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Xiaofeng Wang; Guang Yue; Ela B Plow
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.406

6.  Cyclic functional electrical stimulation does not enhance gains in hand grasp function when used as an adjunct to onabotulinumtoxinA and task practice therapy: a single-blind, randomized controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Douglas J Weber; Elizabeth R Skidmore; Christian Niyonkuru; Chia-Lin Chang; Lynne M Huber; Michael C Munin
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Patient-reported measures provide unique insights into motor function after stroke.

Authors:  Jill Campbell Stewart; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  The EXCITE Trial: Predicting a clinically meaningful motor activity log outcome.

Authors:  Si-Woon Park; Steven L Wolf; Sarah Blanton; Carolee Winstein; Deborah S Nichols-Larsen
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.919

9.  Estimating minimal clinically important differences of upper-extremity measures early after stroke.

Authors:  Catherine E Lang; Dorothy F Edwards; Rebecca L Birkenmeier; Alexander W Dromerick
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Comparing unilateral and bilateral upper limb training: the ULTRA-stroke program design.

Authors:  A Lex E Q van Delden; C Lieke E Peper; Jaap Harlaar; Andreas Daffertshofer; Nienke I Zijp; Kirsten Nienhuys; Peter Koppe; Gert Kwakkel; Peter J Beek
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 2.474

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.