Literature DB >> 15559486

Analysis of the prevalence and causes of ultrafiltration failure during long-term peritoneal dialysis: a cross-sectional study.

Watske Smit1, Natalie Schouten, Nicole van den Berg, Monique J Langedijk, Dirk G Struijk, Raymond T Krediet.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ultrafiltration failure (UFF) is a major complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD). It can occur at any stage of PD, but develops in time and is, therefore, especially important in long-term treatment. To investigate its prevalence and to identify possible causes, we performed a multicenter study in The Netherlands, where patients treated with PD for more than 4 years were studied using a peritoneal function test (standard peritoneal permeability analysis) with 3.86% glucose. UFF was defined as net UF < 400 mL after a 4-hour dwell.
RESULTS: 55 patients unselected for the presence or absence of UFF were analyzed. Mean age was 48 years (range 18 - 74 years); duration of PD ranged from 48 to 144 months (median 61 months); UFF was present in 20 patients (36%). Patients with and without UFF did not differ in age or duration of PD. Median values for patients with normal UF compared to patients with UFF were, for net UF 659 mL versus 120 mL (p < 0.01), transcapillary UF rate 3.8 versus 2.1 mL/ minute (p < 0.01), effective lymphatic absorption 1.0 versus 1.6 mL/min (p < 0.05), mass transfer area coefficient (MTAC) for creatinine 9.0 versus 12.9 mL/min (p< 0.01), dialysate-to-plasma ratio (D/P) for creatinine 0.71 versus 0.86 (p < 0.01), glucose absorption 60% versus 73% (p < 0.01), maximum dip in D/P sodium (as a measure of free water transport) 0.109 versus 0.032 (p < 0.01), and osmotic conductance to glucose 3.0 versus 2.1 microL/min/mmHg (p < 0.05). As causes for UFF, high MTAC creatinine, defined as > 12.5 mL/min, or a glucose absorption > 72%, both reflecting a large vascular surface, a lymphatic absorption rate (LAR) of > 2.14 mL/min, and a decreased dip in D/P sodium of < 0.046 were identified. Most patients had a combination of causes (12 patients), whereas there was only a decreased dip in D/P sodium in 3 patients, only high MTAC creatinine in 1 patient, and only high LAR in 2 patients. We could not identify a cause in 2 patients. Both groups had similar clearances of serum proteins and peritoneal restriction coefficients. However, dialysate cancer antigen 125 concentrations, reflecting mesothelial cell mass, were lower in the UFF patients (2.79 vs 5.38 U/L).
CONCLUSION: The prevalence of UFF is high in long-term PD. It is caused mainly by a large vascular surface area and by impaired channel-mediated water transport. In addition, these patients also had signs of a reduced mesothelial cell mass, indicating damage of the peritoneum on both vascular and mesothelial sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15559486

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  37 in total

1.  Free water transport measured by double mini-PET may be increased by higher glucose exposure in peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Claudio Musetti; Daniele Ciurlino; Silvio V Bertoli
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Does Loss of Residual Renal Function Lead to Increased Volume Overload and Hypertension in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients?

Authors:  Stanley Fan; Andrew Davenport
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.756

3.  TGF-β1 promotes lymphangiogenesis during peritoneal fibrosis.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kinashi; Yasuhiko Ito; Masashi Mizuno; Yasuhiro Suzuki; Takeshi Terabayashi; Fumiko Nagura; Ryohei Hattori; Yoshihisa Matsukawa; Tomohiro Mizuno; Yukihiro Noda; Hayato Nishimura; Ryosuke Nishio; Shoichi Maruyama; Enyu Imai; Seiichi Matsuo; Yoshifumi Takei
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 10.121

4.  Chronic abdominal pain in a patient on chronic peritoneal dialysis: answer.

Authors:  Olivera Marsenic; Bernard Kaplan; Kevin E C Meyers
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 3.714

5.  Alterations of peritoneal transport characteristics in dialysis patients with ultrafiltration failure: tissue and capillary components.

Authors:  Joanna Stachowska-Pietka; Jan Poleszczuk; Michael F Flessner; Bengt Lindholm; Jacek Waniewski
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 5.992

6.  The solution to better preservation of the peritoneal membrane still lies hidden in the solution.

Authors:  Dirk G Struijk
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.756

7.  Interstitial Fibrosis Restricts Osmotic Water Transport in Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis.

Authors:  Johann Morelle; Amadou Sow; Nicolas Hautem; Caroline Bouzin; Ralph Crott; Olivier Devuyst; Eric Goffin
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 10.121

8.  The importance of using peritoneal equlibration test for the peritoneal transport type characterization in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Snezana Uncanin; Senija Rasić; Damir Rebić; Jasminka Dzemidzić; Alma Muslimović; Begler Begović; Vedad Herenda
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.363

Review 9.  Can Free Water Transport Be Used as a Clinical Parameter for Peritoneal Fibrosis in Long-Term PD Patients?

Authors:  Raymond T Krediet; Deirisa Lopes Barreto; Dirk G Struijk
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 10.  Pharmacologic targets and peritoneal membrane remodeling.

Authors:  Karima Farhat; Andrea W D Stavenuiter; Rob H J Beelen; Piet M Ter Wee
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.756

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.