Literature DB >> 20431532

Investigation of bacterial chemotaxis in flow-based microfluidic devices.

Derek L Englert1, Michael D Manson, Arul Jayaraman.   

Abstract

The plug-in-pond and capillary assays are convenient methods for measuring attractant and repellent bacterial chemotaxis. However, these assays do not provide quantitative information on the extent of migration and are not well-suited for investigating repellent taxis. Here, we describe a protocol for a flow-based microfluidic system (microFlow) to quantitatively investigate chemotaxis in response to concentration gradients of attractants and repellents. The microFlow device uses diffusive mixing to generate concentration gradients that are stable throughout the chemotaxis chamber and for the duration of the experiment. The gradients may be of any desired absolute concentration and gradient strength. GFP-expressing bacteria immediately encounter a stable concentration gradient when they enter the chemotaxis chamber, and the migration in response to the gradient is monitored by microscopy. The effects of different parameters that influence the extent of migration in the microFlow device-preparation of the motile bacterial population preparation, strength of the concentration gradient and duration of exposure to the gradient-are discussed in the context of repellent taxis of chemotactically wild-type Escherichia coli cells in a gradient of NiSO(4). Fabrication of the microfluidic device takes 1 d while preparing motile cells and carrying out the chemotaxis experiment takes 4-6 h to complete.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20431532     DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2010.18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Protoc        ISSN: 1750-2799            Impact factor:   13.491


  17 in total

Review 1.  Soft lithography in biology and biochemistry.

Authors:  G M Whitesides; E Ostuni; S Takayama; X Jiang; D E Ingber
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.590

2.  A sensitive, versatile microfluidic assay for bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Hanbin Mao; Paul S Cremer; Michael D Manson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Dynamic gene expression profiling using a microfabricated living cell array.

Authors:  Deanna M Thompson; Kevin R King; Kenneth J Wieder; Mehmet Toner; Martin L Yarmush; Arul Jayaraman
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Assessment of GFP fluorescence in cells of Streptococcus gordonii under conditions of low pH and low oxygen concentration.

Authors:  Martin C Hansen; Robert J Palmer; Camilla Udsen; David C White; Søren Molin
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.777

5.  Microfluidic techniques for the analysis of bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Derek L Englert; Arul Jayaraman; Michael D Manson
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2009

6.  Negative chemotaxis in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  W W Tso; J Adler
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  A method for measuring chemotaxis and use of the method to determine optimum conditions for chemotaxis by Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J Adler
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1973-01

8.  Repellent taxis in response to nickel ion requires neither Ni2+ transport nor the periplasmic NikA binding protein.

Authors:  Derek L Englert; Christopher A Adase; Arul Jayaraman; Michael D Manson
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  A three-channel microfluidic device for generating static linear gradients and its application to the quantitative analysis of bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Jinpian Diao; Lincoln Young; Sue Kim; Elizabeth A Fogarty; Steven M Heilman; Peng Zhou; Michael L Shuler; Mingming Wu; Matthew P DeLisa
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 6.799

10.  Flow-based microfluidic device for quantifying bacterial chemotaxis in stable, competing gradients.

Authors:  Derek L Englert; Michael D Manson; Arul Jayaraman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  13 in total

1.  Baseplate variability of Vibrio cholerae chemoreceptor arrays.

Authors:  Wen Yang; Alejandra Alvarado; Timo Glatter; Simon Ringgaard; Ariane Briegel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Enhancement of Swimming Speed Leads to a More-Efficient Chemotactic Response to Repellent.

Authors:  Richa Karmakar; R V S Uday Bhaskar; Rajesh E Jesudasan; Mahesh S Tirumkudulu; K V Venkatesh
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  Controlling mass transport in microfluidic devices.

Authors:  Jason S Kuo; Daniel T Chiu
Journal:  Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 10.745

4.  Microfluidic assay for simultaneous culture of multiple cell types on surfaces or within hydrogels.

Authors:  Yoojin Shin; Sewoon Han; Jessie S Jeon; Kyoko Yamamoto; Ioannis K Zervantonakis; Ryo Sudo; Roger D Kamm; Seok Chung
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 13.491

5.  Bacterial moving and shaking: the 11th blast meeting.

Authors:  Gladys Alexandre; Sean Crosson; Thomas Shimizu; Tarek Msadek
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 6.  Microfluidics expanding the frontiers of microbial ecology.

Authors:  Roberto Rusconi; Melissa Garren; Roman Stocker
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 12.981

7.  Quantitative analysis of the chemotaxis of a green alga, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, to bicarbonate using diffusion-based microfluidic device.

Authors:  Hong Il Choi; Jaoon Young Hwan Kim; Ho Seok Kwak; Young Joon Sung; Sang Jun Sim
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 8.  Emerging Technologies for Gut Microbiome Research.

Authors:  Jason W Arnold; Jeffrey Roach; M Andrea Azcarate-Peril
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 17.079

Review 9.  From cleanroom to desktop: emerging micro-nanofabrication technology for biomedical applications.

Authors:  Tingrui Pan; Wei Wang
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 10.  Microfluidics for Environmental Applications.

Authors:  Ting Wang; Cecilia Yu; Xing Xie
Journal:  Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.768

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.