Literature DB >> 9915435

Pathological features and prognostic significance of prostate cancer in the apical section determined by whole mount histology.

M Ohori1, F Abbas, T M Wheeler, M W Kattan, P T Scardino, S P Lerner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We test the hypothesis that cancer in the apical section of the prostate is an important independent factor in predicting the progression of clinically localized prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed clinical data and whole mount histological step sections for 500 patients who had undergone radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.
RESULTS: Cancer was in the apex of the prostate in 175 patients (35%). These patients had a larger cancer and higher incidence of positive surgical margins, and were more likely to have a poorly differentiated cancer than the 325 patients without cancer in the apex. However, the presence of apical cancer was not a significant predictor of clinical or prostate specific antigen progression in either univariate or multivariate Cox proportional hazards models when analyzed for the entire group or only in patients with tumor confined to the prostate.
CONCLUSIONS: Apical cancer in a radical prostatectomy specimen is simply a sign of a larger volume cancer and is not independently associated with an increased risk of clinical or prostate specific antigen progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9915435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  7 in total

1.  Do robotic prostatectomy positive surgical margins occur in the same location as extraprostatic extension?

Authors:  Matthew T Johnson; Mitchell L Ramsey; Joshua J Ebel; Ronney Abaza; Debra L Zynger
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Long-term oncological outcomes of apical positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy in the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital cohort.

Authors:  H Wadhwa; M K Terris; W J Aronson; C J Kane; C L Amling; M R Cooperberg; S J Freedland; M R Abern
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 5.554

3.  Ethnic variation in pelvimetric measures and its impact on positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Christian von Bodman; Mika P Matikainen; Luis Herran Yunis; Vincent Laudone; Peter T Scardino; Oguz Akin; Farhang Rabbani
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Characteristics of Detected and Missed Prostate Cancer Foci on 3-T Multiparametric MRI Using an Endorectal Coil Correlated With Whole-Mount Thin-Section Histopathology.

Authors:  Nelly Tan; Daniel J Margolis; David Y Lu; Kevin G King; Jiaoti Huang; Robert E Reiter; Steven S Raman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Management of clinically localized prostate cancer: pathologic processing to robotic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ashutosh Tewari
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2003

6.  Incremental value of magnetic resonance imaging in the advanced management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Liang Wang
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2009-12-31

7.  Impact of positive surgical margins and their locations after radical prostatectomy: comparison of biochemical recurrence according to risk stratification and surgical modality.

Authors:  Min Soo Choo; Sung Yong Cho; Kyungtae Ko; Chang Wook Jeong; Seung Bae Lee; Ja Hyeon Ku; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Cheol Kwak; Hyeon Hoe Kim; Sang Eun Lee; Hyeon Jeong
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 4.226

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.