Literature DB >> 20429833

Skin and subcutaneous adipose layer thickness in adults with diabetes at sites used for insulin injections: implications for needle length recommendations.

Michael A Gibney1, Christina H Arce, Karen J Byron, Laurence J Hirsch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: During subcutaneous insulin therapy, inadvertent intramuscular (IM) injections may increase pain and/or adversely affect glucose control. The most appropriate needle length for patients depends on skin thickness (ST) and the distance to muscle fascia. ST and subcutaneous adipose layer thickness (SCT) were measured in adults with diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 388 US adults with diabetes (in three BMI subgroups: <25, 25-29.9, and >or=30 kg/m(2)) with diverse demographic features were evaluated. Each subject had ultrasound measurements of ST and SCT at four injection sites.
RESULTS: Subjects had BMI 19.4-64.5 kg/m(2), age 18-85 years; 40% Caucasian, 25% Asian, 16% Black, 14% Hispanic; 28% type 1 diabetes. Mean ST (+/-95% CI) was: arm 2.2 mm (2.2, 2.3), thigh 1.9 mm (1.8, 1.9), abdomen 2.2 mm (2.1, 2.2) and buttocks 2.4 mm (2.4, 2.5). Multivariate analyses showed body site, gender, BMI, and race are statistically significant factors for ST but effects were small. Thigh ST was <0.6 mm thinner than the buttocks. Differences of 10 kg/m(2) account for 0.2 mm ST variation. Mean SCT was: arm 10.8 mm (10.2, 11.3), thigh 10.4 mm (9.8, 10.9), abdomen 13.9 mm (13.2, 17.7) and buttocks 15.4 mm (14.7, 16.2). Females had 5.1 mm greater SCT. Differences of 10 kg/m(2) account for 4 mm SCT variation. ADVERSE EVENTS: A few mild hypo- or hyperglycemia events, unrelated to study procedure, were detected and treated before subject discharge from study visits. LIMITATIONS: Only adults in the US were studied; some measurements could not be obtained on every subject, at every injection site.
CONCLUSIONS: Injection site ST does not differ by clinically significant degrees in demographically diverse adults with diabetes; SCT has a wider range. Needles >or=8 mm, inserted perpendicularly, may frequently enter muscle in limbs of males and those with BMI <25 kg/m(2). With 90 degrees insertion, needles 4-5 mm enter the subcutaneous tissue with minimal risk of IM injection in virtually all adults. These data will assist recommending appropriate length needles for subcutaneous insulin injections in adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20429833     DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2010.481203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  61 in total

1.  Analysis and perspective: comparison of insulin diluent leakage post-injection using two different needle lengths and injection volumes in obese patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Timothy S Bailey
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-03-01

Review 2.  Mechanistic determinants of biotherapeutics absorption following SC administration.

Authors:  Wolfgang F Richter; Suraj G Bhansali; Marilyn E Morris
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Randomized trial of infusion set function: steel versus teflon.

Authors:  Parul J Patel; Kari Benasi; Gina Ferrari; Mark G Evans; Satya Shanmugham; Darrell M Wilson; Bruce A Buckingham
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 4.  Biomechanics of the sensor-tissue interface-effects of motion, pressure, and design on sensor performance and the foreign body response-part I: theoretical framework.

Authors:  Kristen L Helton; Buddy D Ratner; Natalie A Wisniewski
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-05-01

5.  Multiphysics Modeling and Simulation of Subcutaneous Injection and Absorption of Biotherapeutics: Model Development.

Authors:  Fudan Zheng; Peng Hou; Clairissa D Corpstein; Lei Xing; Tonglei Li
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Evaluating the Impact of Human Factors and Pen Needle Design on Insulin Pen Injection.

Authors:  Christopher Rini; Bruce C Roberts; Didier Morel; Rick Klug; Benjamin Selvage; Ronald J Pettis
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-03-17

7.  Lipohypertrophy and the artificial pancreas: is this an issue?

Authors:  Lutz Heinemann; Larry Hirsch; Roman Hovorka
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-06-16

8.  Systematic Review of Device Parameters and Design of Studies Bridging Biologic-Device Combination Products Using Prefilled Syringes and Autoinjectors.

Authors:  Ping Hu; Jie Wang; Jeffery Florian; Katherine Shatzer; Alan M Stevens; Jacqueline Gertz; Ping Ji; Shiew Mei Huang; Issam Zineh; Yow-Ming C Wang
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 9.  Biocompatible materials for continuous glucose monitoring devices.

Authors:  Scott P Nichols; Ahyeon Koh; Wesley L Storm; Jae Ho Shin; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 60.622

10.  Paediatric type 1 diabetes 2018: Clinical and research insights.

Authors:  Stephen J Zborovski; Farid H Mahmud
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 2.253

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.