Volumetric change of the graft bone after intertransverse fusion.

STUDY
DESIGN: Patients in whom good intertransverse fusion had been achieved were selected for the volumetric study of the fusion mass using sequential computed tomography scans.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the natural volumetric change of intertransverse fusion mass and the effect of the disease entity and spinal instrumentation on the fusion mass volume. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The magnitude of volumetric change of the graft bone after intertransverse fusion is still inconclusive.
METHODS: Fifteen adult patients who underwent decompression surgery with single-level lumbar and lumbosacral intertransverse fusion were selected for this study. Preoperative diagnoses were degenerative spondylolisthesis in nine patients and isthmic spondylolisthesis in six. Seven of the 15 patients received pedicle screw fixation. They were categorized into two major groups: 1) instrumented and noninstrumented groups and 2) isthmic and degenerative groups. To assess the volumetric change of the graft bone, sequential computed tomography scans were obtained 2 weeks after surgery and again 18 months after surgery.
RESULTS: The overall initial mean graft volume was 6251 mm3, which decreased to 2842 mm3 by 18 months after surgery (P < 0.001). The overall mean volume loss between the two periods was 54.8% of the initial graft volume. Although there was no significant difference in the mean graft volume between the groups at either 2 weeks or 18 months after surgery (P > 0.05 in all comparisons), the mean graft volume in each group decreased significantly during the observation period (P < 0.01 in all comparisons). There was no significant difference in the mean volume loss or in the ratio of residual volume to the initial graft volume between the groups during the study period (P > 0.05 in all comparisons). The initial graft volume correlated positively with the graft volume at 18 months after surgery (r = 0.612, P < 0.01) and volume loss (r = 0.949, P < 0.01), but negatively with the residual volume ratio (r = -0.507, P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: These results showed that more than one half of the initial graft bone volume was being absorbed during the consolidation processes of the graft bone, and that the volume loss during the period was not significantly affected by the spinal instrumentation or by the disease entity. It was also found that the greater the amount of the initial graft bone, the larger the fusion mass at 18 months after surgery. The volume loss, however, increased proportionally to an increase in the initial graft bone volume. The efficiency (ratio of residual volume to the initial graft volume) of the intertransverse fusion also tended to decline as the initial graft volume increased.