Literature DB >> 20425972

Prostate biopsy assistance system with gland deformation estimation for enhanced precision.

Michael Baumann1, Pierre Mozer, Vincent Daanen, Jocelyne Troccaz.   

Abstract

Computer-assisted prostate biopsies became a very active research area during the last years. Prostate tracking makes it possible to overcome several drawbacks of the current standard transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) biopsy procedure, namely the insufficient targeting accuracy which may lead to a biopsy distribution of poor quality, the very approximate knowledge about the actual location of the sampled tissues which makes it difficult to implement focal therapy strategies based on biopsy results, and finally the difficulty to precisely reach non-ultrasound (US) targets stemming from different modalities, statistical atlases or previous biopsy series. The prostate tracking systems presented so far are limited to rigid transformation tracking. However, the gland can get considerably deformed during the intervention because of US probe pressure and patient movements. We propose to use 3D US combined with image-based elastic registration to estimate these deformations. A fast elastic registration algorithm that copes with the frequently occurring US shadows is presented. A patient cohort study was performed, which yielded a statistically significant in-vivo accuracy of 0.83 +/- 0.54 mm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20425972     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04268-3_9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv


  7 in total

1.  Prostate multimodality image registration based on B-splines and quadrature local energy.

Authors:  Jhimli Mitra; Robert Martí; Arnau Oliver; Xavier Lladó; Soumya Ghose; Joan C Vilanova; Fabrice Meriaudeau
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Comparison of Elastic and Rigid Registration during Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy: A Multi-Operator Phantom Study.

Authors:  Graham R Hale; Marcin Czarniecki; Alexis Cheng; Jonathan B Bloom; Reza Seifabadi; Samuel A Gold; Kareem N Rayn; Vikram K Sabarwal; Sherif Mehralivand; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey; Brad Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Mixed reality ultrasound guidance system: a case study in system development and a cautionary tale.

Authors:  Golafsoun Ameri; John S H Baxter; Daniel Bainbridge; Terry M Peters; Elvis C S Chen
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  A Molecular Image-directed, 3D Ultrasound-guided Biopsy System for the Prostate.

Authors:  Baowei Fei; David M Schuster; Viraj Master; Hamed Akbari; Aaron Fenster; Peter Nieh
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2012-02-16

Review 5.  Follow-up of negative MRI-targeted prostate biopsies: when are we missing cancer?

Authors:  Samuel A Gold; Graham R Hale; Jonathan B Bloom; Clayton P Smith; Kareem N Rayn; Vladimir Valera; Bradford J Wood; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Target detection: magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Sonn; Daniel J Margolis; Leonard S Marks
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.498

7.  Development and Phantom Validation of a 3-D-Ultrasound-Guided System for Targeting MRI-Visible Lesions During Transrectal Prostate Biopsy.

Authors:  Yipeng Hu; Veeru Kasivisvanathan; Lucy A M Simmons; Matthew J Clarkson; Stephen A Thompson; Taimur T Shah; Hashim U Ahmed; Shonit Punwani; David J Hawkes; Mark Emberton; Caroline M Moore; Dean C Barratt
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 4.538

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.