Literature DB >> 24239473

Target detection: magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy.

Geoffrey A Sonn1, Daniel J Margolis2, Leonard S Marks3.   

Abstract

Recent advances in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have enabled image-guided detection of prostate cancer. Fusion of MRI with real-time ultrasound (US) allows the information from MRI to be used to direct biopsy needles under US guidance in an office-based procedure. Fusion can be performed either cognitively or electronically, using a fusion device. Fusion devices allow superimposition (coregistration) of stored MRI images on real-time US images; areas of suspicion found on MRI can then serve as targets during US-guided biopsy. Currently available fusion devices use a variety of technologies to perform coregistration: robotic tracking via a mechanical arm with built-in encoders (Artemis/Eigen, BioJet/Geoscan); electromagnetic tracking (UroNav/Philips-Invivo, Hi-RVS/Hitachi); or tracking with a 3D US probe (Urostation/Koelis). Targeted fusion biopsy has been shown to identify more clinically significant cancers and fewer insignificant cancers than conventional biopsy. Fusion biopsy appears to be a major advancement over conventional biopsy because it allows (1) direct targeting of suspicious areas not seen on US and (2) follow-up biopsy of specific cancerous sites in men undergoing active surveillance.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biopsy; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostatic neoplasms; Ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24239473      PMCID: PMC4019721          DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  49 in total

1.  Comparison of quantitative T2 mapping and diffusion-weighted imaging in the normal and pathologic prostate.

Authors:  P Gibbs; D J Tozer; G P Liney; L W Turnbull
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Image registration accuracy of a 3-dimensional transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy system.

Authors:  Yujun Guo; Priya N Werahera; Ramkrishnan Narayanan; Lu Li; Dinesh Kumar; E David Crawford; Jasjit S Suri
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  Extended peripheral zone biopsy schemes increase cancer detection rates and minimize variance in prostate specific antigen and age related cancer rates: results of a community multi-practice study.

Authors:  Joseph C Presti; Gerard J O'Dowd; M Craig Miller; Rubina Mattu; Robert W Veltri
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Transperineal prostatic biopsy guided by transrectal ultrasonography.

Authors:  G Vallancien; J P Leo; J M Brisset
Journal:  Prog Clin Biol Res       Date:  1987

5.  Transperineal magnetic resonance image guided prostate biopsy.

Authors:  A V D'Amico; C M Tempany; R Cormack; N Hata; M Jinzaki; K Tuncali; M Weinstein; J P Richie
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Optimal combinations of systematic sextant and laterally directed biopsies for the detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  J L Gore; S F Shariat; B J Miles; D Kadmon; N Jiang; T M Wheeler; K M Slawin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging guided prostate biopsy in men with repeat negative biopsies and increased prostate specific antigen.

Authors:  Thomas Hambrock; Diederik M Somford; Caroline Hoeks; Stefan A W Bouwense; Henkjan Huisman; Derya Yakar; Inge M van Oort; J Alfred Witjes; Jurgen J Fütterer; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Value of targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion in men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Sonn; Edward Chang; Shyam Natarajan; Daniel J Margolis; Malu Macairan; Patricia Lieu; Jiaoti Huang; Frederick J Dorey; Robert E Reiter; Leonard S Marks
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Lesion localization in patients with a previous negative transrectal ultrasound biopsy and persistently elevated prostate specific antigen level using diffusion-weighted imaging at three Tesla before rebiopsy.

Authors:  Byung Kwan Park; Hyun Moo Lee; Chan Kyo Kim; Han Yong Choi; Jong Wook Park
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 6.016

10.  Anatomy and pathology of the male pelvis by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  H Hricak; R D Williams; D B Spring; K L Moon; M W Hedgcock; R A Watson; L E Crooks
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  34 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy: Review of Technology, Techniques, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Michael Kongnyuy; Arvin K George; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Personalized radiotherapy: concepts, biomarkers and trial design.

Authors:  A H Ree; K R Redalen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Screening and Detection of Prostate Cancer-Review of Literature and Current Perspective.

Authors:  Ananthakrishnan Sivaraman; Kulthe Ramesh Seetharam Bhat
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-01-23

4.  Association of training level and outcome of software-based image fusion-guided targeted prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Niklas Westhoff; Henning Haumann; Maximilian Christian Kriegmair; Jost von Hardenberg; Johannes Budjan; Stefan Porubsky; Maurice Stephan Michel; Patrick Honeck; Manuel Ritter
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Multiparametric MRI/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy decreases detection of indolent cancer in African-American men.

Authors:  M Kongnyuy; M M Siddiqui; A K George; A Muthigi; A Sidana; M Maruf; B Turkbey; P L Choyke; B J Wood; P A Pinto
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 5.554

6.  Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies vs. magnetic resonance imaging ultrasound fusion targeted biopsies: Who are the best candidates?

Authors:  Elsa Bey; Olivier Gaget; Jean-Luc Descotes; Quentin Franquet; Jean-Jacques Rambeaud; Jean-Alexandre Long; Gaelle Fiard
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Free-hand transperineal targeted prostate biopsy with real-time fusion imaging of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound: single-center experience in China.

Authors:  Qing Zhang; Wei Wang; Rong Yang; Gutian Zhang; Bing Zhang; Weiping Li; Haifeng Huang; Hongqian Guo
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Detecting Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Marko Brock; Christian von Bodman; Jüri Palisaar; Wolfgang Becker; Philipp Martin-Seidel; Joachim Noldus
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 5.594

9.  Update of the Standard Operating Procedure on the Use of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Diagnosis, Staging and Management of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Marc A Bjurlin; Peter R Carroll; Scott Eggener; Pat F Fulgham; Daniel J Margolis; Peter A Pinto; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Jonathan N Rubenstein; Daniel B Rukstalis; Samir S Taneja; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Endorectal multiparametric MRI of the prostate: incremental effect of perfusion imaging on biopsy target identification.

Authors:  Gonzalo Romero; Bryan R Foster; David R Pettersson; Alice W Fung; Alexander R Guimaraes; Fergus V Coakley
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 1.605

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.