INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We sought to define changes in vaginal distensibility (VD) induced by pregnancy and vaginal delivery using a novel in vivo biomechanical testing protocol. METHODS: Under sedation, a balloon was inserted into the vagina of 27 virgin, pregnant and 4-week postpartum Long-Evans rats and incrementally distended. Pressure-volume curves were generated with slopes characterizing VD (higher slope = less distensible). One-way ANOVA with a Bonferroni post-hoc test were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Mean pressures at an infusion volume of 1 cc were lower in pregnant and postpartum rats than in virgins (P < 0.001). VD was increased in pregnant vs. virgin rats (P < 0.001) and did not recover to virgin levels post partum (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a test that measures VD in vivo under clinically relevant loading conditions. The increased VD in the late postpartum period defines a persistent change in biomechanical behavior of the vagina related to pregnancy and vaginal delivery.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We sought to define changes in vaginal distensibility (VD) induced by pregnancy and vaginal delivery using a novel in vivo biomechanical testing protocol. METHODS: Under sedation, a balloon was inserted into the vagina of 27 virgin, pregnant and 4-week postpartum Long-Evans rats and incrementally distended. Pressure-volume curves were generated with slopes characterizing VD (higher slope = less distensible). One-way ANOVA with a Bonferroni post-hoc test were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Mean pressures at an infusion volume of 1 cc were lower in pregnant and postpartum rats than in virgins (P < 0.001). VD was increased in pregnant vs. virgin rats (P < 0.001) and did not recover to virgin levels post partum (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a test that measures VD in vivo under clinically relevant loading conditions. The increased VD in the late postpartum period defines a persistent change in biomechanical behavior of the vagina related to pregnancy and vaginal delivery.
Authors: K B Campbell; Y Wu; A M Simpson; R D Kirkpatrick; S G Shroff; H L Granzier; B K Slinker Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Jerry L Lowder; Kristen M Debes; Daniel K Moon; Nancy Howden; Steven D Abramowitch; Pamela A Moalli Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Pamela A Moalli; Kristen M Debes; Leslie A Meyn; Nancy S Howden; Steven D Abramowitch Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2008-04-08 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Katrina M Knight; Pamela A Moalli; Alexis Nolfi; Stacy Palcsey; William R Barone; Steven D Abramowitch Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2016-02-12 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Marianna Alperin; Timothy Kaddis; Rajeswari Pichika; Mary C Esparza; Richard L Lieber Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2016-02-12 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Andrew Feola; Pamela Moalli; Marianna Alperin; Robbie Duerr; Robin E Gandley; Steven Abramowitch Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2010-09-08 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Marianna Alperin; Lori J Tuttle; Blair R Conner; Danielle M Dixon; Margie A Mathewson; Samuel R Ward; Richard L Lieber Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2014-06-11 Impact factor: 2.894