Literature DB >> 20424822

Treatment decision-making and information-seeking preferences in women with pelvic floor disorders.

Vivian W Sung1, Christina A Raker, Deborah L Myers, Melissa A Clark.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The Autonomy Preference Index (API) and Control Preferences Scale (CPS) measure information-seeking and decision-making preferences. Our objective was to validate these scales in women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) and identify variables associated with decision-making preferences.
METHODS: Women seeking care for PFDs completed the API and the CPS. Psychometric properties were determined. Multivariable analyses were used to identify correlates of information-seeking and decision-making preferences.
RESULTS: One hundred ten women were recruited. Both scales demonstrated good psychometric properties (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.5 to 0.7; Cronbach's alpha = 0.8 for the API, and r = -0.3 between the API and CPS). Based on scores, women had strong preferences to be well informed, but were more neutral in their decision-making preferences. In multivariable analyses, higher education levels were associated with a stronger desire for seeking medical information.
CONCLUSIONS: Women seeking care for PFDs vary in their preferences for participating in treatment decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20424822      PMCID: PMC2910816          DOI: 10.1007/s00192-010-1155-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  28 in total

1.  Analyzing patient participation in medical encounters.

Authors:  R L Street; B Millay
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2001

2.  Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients.

Authors:  J Ende; L Kazis; A Ash; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 395. Surgery and patient choice.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Breast conservation versus mastectomy: distress sequelae as a function of choice.

Authors:  S M Levy; R B Herberman; J K Lee; M E Lippman; T d'Angelo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Exploring dental patients' preferred roles in treatment decision-making - a novel approach.

Authors:  H Chapple; S Shah; A-L Caress; E J Kay
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2003-03-22       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  Patient-selected goals: a new perspective on surgical outcome.

Authors:  Eman A Elkadry; Kimberly S Kenton; Mary P FitzGerald; Susan Shott; Linda Brubaker
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. a suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Stacey L Sheridan; Russell P Harris; Steven H Woolf
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease.

Authors:  S H Kaplan; S Greenfield; J E Ware
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Doctor-patient interaction, patients' health behavior and effects of treatment.

Authors:  I Heszen-Klemens; E Lapińska
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Patient-centered goals for pelvic floor dysfunction surgery: long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Kathie L Hullfish; Viktor E Bovbjerg; William D Steers
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  10 in total

1.  Ugandan Study Participants Experience Electronic Monitoring of Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence as Welcomed Pressure to Adhere.

Authors:  Jeffrey I Campbell; Nir Eyal; Angella Musiimenta; Bridget Burns; Sylvia Natukunda; Nicholas Musinguzi; Jessica E Haberer
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2018-10

2.  Decision making for depression treatment during pregnancy and the postpartum period.

Authors:  Sapana R Patel; Katherine L Wisner
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 6.505

3.  Goal attainment scaling in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms: development and pilot testing of the Self-Assessment Goal Achievement (SAGA) questionnaire.

Authors:  Linda Brubaker; Vik Khullar; Elisabeth Piault; Christopher J Evans; Tamara Bavendam; James Beach; Yating Yeh; Zoe S Kopp; Con J Kelleher; Jeffrey Trocio
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Talking Points: Women's Information Needs for Informed Decision-Making About Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Aimée C Dane; Madelyn Peterson; Yvette D Miller
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Older Adults' Use of Online and Offline Sources of Health Information and Constructs of Reliance and Self-Efficacy for Medical Decision Making.

Authors:  Amanda K Hall; Jay M Bernhardt; Virginia Dodd
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2015-06-09

6.  Patients' perspectives on urethral bulk injection therapy and mid-urethral sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Fenne M Casteleijn; Sandra E Zwolsman; Claudia R Kowalik; Jan-Paul P W R Roovers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Knowledge of pelvic organ prolapse in patients and their information-seeking preferences: comparing Vienna and Moscow.

Authors:  Polina Lyatoshinskaya; D Gumina; A Popov; M Koch; M Hagmann; W Umek
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Challenges and Opportunities with Empowering Baby Boomers for Personal Health Information Management Using Consumer Health Information Technologies: an Ecological Perspective.

Authors:  Cynthia M LeRouge; Donghua Tao; Jennifer Ohs; Helen W Lach; Keri Jupka; Ricardo Wray
Journal:  AIMS Public Health       Date:  2014-09-02

9.  "Please listen to me": A cross-sectional study of experiences of seniors and their caregivers making housing decisions.

Authors:  Rhéda Adekpedjou; Dawn Stacey; Nathalie Brière; Adriana Freitas; Mirjam M Garvelink; Stéphane Turcotte; Matthew Menear; Henriette Bourassa; Kimberley Fraser; Pierre J Durand; Serge Dumont; Lise Roy; France Légaré
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Shared decision making in surgery: a scoping review of patient and surgeon preferences.

Authors:  Laura A Shinkunas; Caleb J Klipowicz; Erica M Carlisle
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.796

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.