Literature DB >> 15295366

Patient-centered goals for pelvic floor dysfunction surgery: long-term follow-up.

Kathie L Hullfish1, Viktor E Bovbjerg, William D Steers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to describe long-term postoperative perceived achievement of subjective preoperative goals for pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) surgery. STUDY
DESIGN: From March 2000 through December 2001, 123 PFD surgical patients completed a preoperative open-ended questionnaire on which they described up to 5 personal outcome goals for PFD surgery. Patients were asked to review their original goals list and assess the degree to which they had met their goals on a 5-point scale (-2=strongly disagree the goal had been met to +2=strongly agree that the goal had been met) 3 months after surgery and again between 1 and 3 years after surgery. At the second follow-up, patients also completed the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) and Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) instruments to assess life impact and symptom distress, respectively.
RESULTS: Of 50 women to date with long-term follow-up, 98% were white, 96% had delivered at least 1 child, 38% had previous surgery for PFD, mean weight was 74.2 +/- 14.1 kilos, and mean age was 65.4 +/- 11.5 years. Mean follow-up duration was 1.8 years, and ranged from 0.98 to 3.01 years. Of 194 goals listed by participants, 40.2% had to do with resuming previous activities or lifestyle, 38.1% with symptom relief, 9.3% with improving self-image and social relationships, 7.7% with improving general health, and 4.6% with improving physical appearance. At the individual goal level, 72% of goals were attained at short-term, and 68% attained at long-term follow-up. Long-term goal achievement did not vary significantly by category of goal. Goal achievement was lower only for symptom relief at long-term follow-up (68.9%) than at short-term follow-up (87.4%, P <.001). At the person level, 45.8% of women reported achieving all listed goals in the short term, and 42.0% in the long term. Long-term goal achievement was associated with PFD-specific quality of life (UDI-6 and IIQ-7 scores) and inversely associated with surgical complications, but was not associated with other clinical or demographic variables, including weight, parity, PFD diagnosis, psychiatric comorbidity, surgical route, or previous surgical history.
CONCLUSION: Self-reported achievement of preoperatively recorded goals for PFD surgery persisted 1 to 3 years after surgery. The association of goal achievement to IIQ-7 and UDI-6 scores suggests that goal achievement is related to, but not identical to, overall measures of PFD life impact and symptom distress. Future work should examine the association of goal achievement to clinical measures of PFD severity, and compare surgically and medically managed patients. Preoperative assessment of goals may be a useful addition to clinical and subjective data in the long-term management of women with pelvic floor disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15295366     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  24 in total

1.  Validity and reliability of patient selected goals as an outcome measure in overactive bladder.

Authors:  Rufus Cartwright; Sushma Srikrishna; Linda Cardozo; Dudley Robinson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for reporting outcomes of surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Philip Toozs-Hobson; Robert Freeman; Matthew Barber; Christopher Maher; Bernard Haylen; Stavros Athanasiou; Steven Swift; Kristene Whitmore; Gamal Ghoniem; Dirk de Ridder
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Mixed incontinence: comparing definitions in non-surgical patients.

Authors:  Linda Brubaker; Emily S Lukacz; Kathryn Burgio; Philippe Zimmern; Peggy Norton; Wendy Leng; Harry Johnson; Stephen Kraus; Anne Stoddard
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.696

Review 4.  What's a 'cure'? Patient-centred outcomes of treatments for stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  R M Freeman
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-09-12

Review 5.  Repair of pelvic organ prolapse: what is the goal?

Authors:  Margarita M Aponte; Nirit Rosenblum
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Treatment decision-making and information-seeking preferences in women with pelvic floor disorders.

Authors:  Vivian W Sung; Christina A Raker; Deborah L Myers; Melissa A Clark
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Patient-selected goal attainment for pessary wearers: what is the clinical relevance?

Authors:  Yuko M Komesu; Rebecca G Rogers; Martha A Rode; Ellen C Craig; Ronald M Schrader; Katey A Gallegos; Biatris Villareal
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Validation of the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapse.

Authors:  Sushma Srikrishna; Dudley Robinson; Linda Cardozo
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Qualifying a quantitative approach to women's expectations of continence surgery.

Authors:  Sushma Srikrishna; Dudley Robinson; Linda Cardozo
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-04-07

10.  Goal attainment after treatment in patients with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Mamta M Mamik; Rebecca G Rogers; Clifford R Qualls; Yuko M Komesu
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.