Literature DB >> 20424018

Out for a smoke: the impact of cigarette craving on zoning out during reading.

Michael A Sayette1, Jonathan W Schooler, Erik D Reichle.   

Abstract

Cigarette craving has powerful effects on cognitive functioning, which may promote smoking behavior and relapse. One area of cognition that has had little impact on craving research is human consciousness. Developments in consciousness research using a mindless-reading paradigm permit examination of the effects of craving on both the occurrence and the awareness of mental lapses. Forty-four smokers, who were either nicotine deprived (crave condition) or nondeprived (low-crave condition), performed a mindless-reading task. This task assesses both self-caught and probe-caught mind-wandering episodes to distinguish between lapses that are within and outside of awareness. Compared with the low cravers, those in the cigarette-crave condition were significantly more likely to acknowledge that their mind was wandering when they were probed. When we adjusted for this more-than-threefold increase in zoning out, craving also lowered the probability of catching oneself. Results suggest that craving simultaneously increases mental lapses while reducing the metacognitive capacity to notice them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20424018      PMCID: PMC5465955          DOI: 10.1177/0956797609354059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  21 in total

1.  Effects of nicotine deprivation on craving response covariation in smokers.

Authors:  Michael A Sayette; Christopher S Martin; Jay G Hull; Joan M Wertz; Michael A Perrott
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2003-02

Review 2.  Imaginary relish and exquisite torture: the elaborated intrusion theory of desire.

Authors:  David J Kavanagh; Jackie Andrade; Jon May
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  The effects of acute exercise on cognitive functioning and cigarette cravings during temporary abstinence from smoking.

Authors:  Kate Janse Van Rensburg; Adrian H Taylor
Journal:  Hum Psychopharmacol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.672

4.  Attentional bias predicts outcome in smoking cessation.

Authors:  Andrew J Waters; Saul Shiffman; Michael A Sayette; Jean A Paty; Chad J Gwaltney; Mark H Balabanis
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Nicotine withdrawal and accident rates.

Authors:  A J Waters; M J Jarvis; S R Sutton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-07-09       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Smoking urges affect language processing.

Authors:  R A Zwaan; T P Truitt
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Craving is associated with smoking relapse: findings from three prospective studies.

Authors:  J D Killen; S P Fortmann
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.157

8.  A day at a time: predicting smoking lapse from daily urge.

Authors:  S Shiffman; J B Engberg; J A Paty; W G Perz; M Gnys; J D Kassel; M Hickcox
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1997-02

9.  Absent-mindedness: Lapses of conscious awareness and everyday cognitive failures.

Authors:  James Allan Cheyne; Jonathan S A Carriere; Daniel Smilek
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2006-01-19

10.  A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between attentional bias and subjective craving in substance abuse.

Authors:  Matt Field; Marcus R Munafò; Ingmar H A Franken
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 17.737

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Cognitive enhancement as a treatment for drug addictions.

Authors:  Mehmet Sofuoglu; Elise E DeVito; Andrew J Waters; Kathleen M Carroll
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 2.  Counterbalancing in smoking cue research: a critical analysis.

Authors:  Michael A Sayette; Kasey M Griffin; W Michael Sayers
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Smoking cues, argument strength, and perceived effectiveness of antismoking PSAs.

Authors:  Sungkyoung Lee; Joseph N Cappella; Caryn Lerman; Andrew A Strasser
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  Not all drugs are created equal: impaired future thinking in opiate, but not alcohol, users.

Authors:  Ahmed A Moustafa; Alejandro N Morris; Jean Louis Nandrino; Błażej Misiak; Monika Szewczuk-Bogusławska; Dorota Frydecka; Mohamad El Haj
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-11       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  A cognitive model-based approach to testing mechanistic explanations for neuropsychological decrements during tobacco abstinence.

Authors:  Alexander Weigard; Cynthia Huang-Pollock; Andrew Heathcote; Larry Hawk; Nicolas J Schlienz
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Cell-phone use diminishes self-awareness of impaired driving.

Authors:  David M Sanbonmatsu; David L Strayer; Francesco Biondi; Arwen A Behrends; Shannon M Moore
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

7.  Peak provoked craving: an alternative to smoking cue-reactivity.

Authors:  Michael A Sayette; Stephen T Tiffany
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 6.526

8.  Sensitivity to Referential Ambiguity in Discourse: The Role of Attention, Working Memory, and Verbal Ability.

Authors:  Megan A Boudewyn; Debra L Long; Matthew J Traxler; Tyler A Lesh; Shruti Dave; George R Mangun; Cameron S Carter; Tamara Y Swaab
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 9.  Trends in syntactic parsing: anticipation, Bayesian estimation, and good-enough parsing.

Authors:  Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 10.  A cognitive framework for understanding and improving interference resolution in the brain.

Authors:  Jyoti Mishra; Joaquin A Anguera; David A Ziegler; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.453

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.