Literature DB >> 20417600

Molecular structures of crossover and noncrossover intermediates during gap repair in yeast: implications for recombination.

Katrina Mitchel1, Hengshan Zhang, Caroline Welz-Voegele, Sue Jinks-Robertson.   

Abstract

The molecular structures of crossover (CO) and noncrossover (NCO) intermediates were determined by sequencing the products formed when a gapped plasmid was repaired using a diverged chromosomal template. Analyses were done in the absence of mismatch repair (MMR) to allow efficient detection of strand-transfer intermediates, and the results reveal striking differences in the extents and locations of heteroduplex DNA (hDNA) in NCO versus CO products. These data indicate that most NCOs are produced by synthesis-dependent strand annealing rather than by a canonical double-strand break repair pathway and that resolution of Holliday junctions formed as part of the latter pathway is highly constrained to generate CO products. We suggest a model in which the length of hDNA formed by the initiating strand invasion event determines susceptibility of the resulting intermediate to antirecombination and ultimately whether a CO- or a NCO-producing pathway is followed. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20417600      PMCID: PMC2865147          DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.02.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell        ISSN: 1097-2765            Impact factor:   17.970


  40 in total

Review 1.  DNA mismatch repair and genetic instability.

Authors:  B D Harfe; S Jinks-Robertson
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 16.830

2.  Mus81-Eme1 are essential components of a Holliday junction resolvase.

Authors:  M N Boddy; Pierre-Henri L Gaillard; W H McDonald; P Shanahan; J R Yates; P Russell
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2001-11-16       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Role of the DNA repair nucleases Rad13, Rad2 and Uve1 of Schizosaccharomyces pombe in mismatch correction.

Authors:  C Kunz; O Fleck
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-10-19       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Differential timing and control of noncrossover and crossover recombination during meiosis.

Authors:  T Allers; M Lichten
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2001-07-13       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Alteration of gene conversion tract length and associated crossing over during plasmid gap repair in nuclease-deficient strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  L S Symington; L E Kang; S Moreau
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Regulation of mitotic homeologous recombination in yeast. Functions of mismatch repair and nucleotide excision repair genes.

Authors:  A Nicholson; M Hendrix; S Jinks-Robertson; G F Crouse
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  SGS1, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologue of BLM and WRN, suppresses genome instability and homeologous recombination.

Authors:  K Myung; A Datta; C Chen; R D Kolodner
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 8.  Role of RAD52 epistasis group genes in homologous recombination and double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 11.056

9.  Gene conversion tracts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae can be extremely short and highly directional.

Authors:  Sean Palmer; Ezra Schildkraut; Raquel Lazarin; Jimmy Nguyen; Jac A Nickoloff
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Mph1 requires mismatch repair-independent and -dependent functions of MutSalpha to regulate crossover formation during homologous recombination repair.

Authors:  Ye Dee Tay; Julie M Sidebotham; Leonard Wu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  42 in total

1.  Mus81 and Yen1 promote reciprocal exchange during mitotic recombination to maintain genome integrity in budding yeast.

Authors:  Chu Kwen Ho; Gerard Mazón; Alicia F Lam; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  Rad51-mediated double-strand break repair and mismatch correction of divergent substrates.

Authors:  Ranjith Anand; Annette Beach; Kevin Li; James Haber
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  RAD5A, RECQ4A, and MUS81 have specific functions in homologous recombination and define different pathways of DNA repair in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Anja Mannuss; Stefanie Dukowic-Schulze; Stefanie Suer; Frank Hartung; Michael Pacher; Holger Puchta
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 11.277

4.  Removal of N-6-methyladenine by the nucleotide excision repair pathway triggers the repair of mismatches in yeast gap-repair intermediates.

Authors:  Xiaoge Guo; Sue Jinks-Robertson
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2013-10-08

5.  Mitotic Gene Conversion Tracts Associated with Repair of a Defined Double-Strand Break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Yee Fang Hum; Sue Jinks-Robertson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Mph1 and Mus81-Mms4 prevent aberrant processing of mitotic recombination intermediates.

Authors:  Gerard Mazón; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  High-Throughput Analysis of Heteroduplex DNA in Mitotic Recombination Products.

Authors:  Dionna Gamble; Yee Fang Hum; Sue Jinks-Robertson
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

8.  Regulation of hetDNA Length during Mitotic Double-Strand Break Repair in Yeast.

Authors:  Xiaoge Guo; Yee Fang Hum; Kevin Lehner; Sue Jinks-Robertson
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 17.970

9.  Roles of exonucleases and translesion synthesis DNA polymerases during mitotic gap repair in yeast.

Authors:  Xiaoge Guo; Sue Jinks-Robertson
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2013-11-05

10.  Remarkably Long-Tract Gene Conversion Induced by Fragile Site Instability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Shahana A Chumki; Mikael K Dunn; Thomas F Coates; Jeanmarie D Mishler; Ellen M Younkin; Anne M Casper
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.