Literature DB >> 27343237

Remarkably Long-Tract Gene Conversion Induced by Fragile Site Instability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Shahana A Chumki1, Mikael K Dunn1, Thomas F Coates1, Jeanmarie D Mishler1, Ellen M Younkin1, Anne M Casper2.   

Abstract

Replication stress causes breaks at chromosomal locations called common fragile sites. Deletions causing loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in human tumors are strongly correlated with common fragile sites, but the role of gene conversion in LOH at fragile sites in tumors is less well studied. Here, we investigated gene conversion stimulated by instability at fragile site FS2 in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae In our screening system, mitotic LOH events near FS2 are identified by production of red/white sectored colonies. We analyzed single nucleotide polymorphisms between homologs to determine the cause and extent of LOH. Instability at FS2 increases gene conversion 48- to 62-fold, and conversions unassociated with crossover represent 6-7% of LOH events. Gene conversion can result from repair of mismatches in heteroduplex DNA during synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA), double-strand break repair (DSBR), and from break-induced replication (BIR) that switches templates [double BIR (dBIR)]. It has been proposed that SDSA and DSBR typically result in shorter gene-conversion tracts than dBIR. In cells under replication stress, we found that bidirectional tracts at FS2 have a median length of 40.8 kb and a wide distribution of lengths; most of these tracts are not crossover-associated. Tracts that begin at the fragile site FS2 and extend only distally are significantly shorter. The high abundance and long length of noncrossover, bidirectional gene-conversion tracts suggests that dBIR is a prominent mechanism for repair of lesions at FS2, thus this mechanism is likely to be a driver of common fragile site-stimulated LOH in human tumors.
Copyright © 2016 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BIR; fragile site; gene conversion; homologous recombination; loss of heterozygosity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27343237      PMCID: PMC5012379          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.116.191205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  66 in total

1.  Yeast intrachromosomal recombination: long gene conversion tracts are preferentially associated with reciprocal exchange and require the RAD1 and RAD3 gene products.

Authors:  A Aguilera; H L Klein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Break-induced replication: what is it and what is it for?

Authors:  Bertrand Llorente; Catherine E Smith; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 4.534

3.  Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods.

Authors:  R G Newcombe
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 4.  Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  F Pâques; J E Haber
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 11.056

5.  Completion of replication map of Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome III.

Authors:  A Poloumienko; A Dershowitz; J De; C S Newlon
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.138

6.  DNA polymerase alpha inhibition by aphidicolin induces gaps and breaks at common fragile sites in human chromosomes.

Authors:  T W Glover; C Berger; J Coyle; B Echo
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Translesion Polymerases Drive Microhomology-Mediated Break-Induced Replication Leading to Complex Chromosomal Rearrangements.

Authors:  Cynthia J Sakofsky; Sandeep Ayyar; Angela K Deem; Woo-Hyun Chung; Grzegorz Ira; Anna Malkova
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 8.  Chromosome fragile sites.

Authors:  Sandra G Durkin; Thomas W Glover
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 16.830

9.  Chromosome rearrangements via template switching between diverged repeated sequences.

Authors:  Ranjith P Anand; Olga Tsaponina; Patricia W Greenwell; Cheng-Sheng Lee; Wei Du; Thomas D Petes; James E Haber
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  The role of Exo1p exonuclease in DNA end resection to generate gene conversion tracts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Yi Yin; Thomas D Petes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  6 in total

1.  Somatic recombination in adult tissues: What is there to learn?

Authors:  Katarzyna Siudeja; Allison J Bardin
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 2.160

Review 2.  Cis- and Trans-Modifiers of Repeat Expansions: Blending Model Systems with Human Genetics.

Authors:  Ryan J McGinty; Sergei M Mirkin
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  The neutral rate of whole-genome duplication varies among yeast species and their hybrids.

Authors:  S Marsit; M Hénault; G Charron; A Fijarczyk; C R Landry
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  High-resolution mapping of heteroduplex DNA formed during UV-induced and spontaneous mitotic recombination events in yeast.

Authors:  Yi Yin; Margaret Dominska; Eunice Yim; Thomas D Petes
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Mitotic gene conversion can be as important as meiotic conversion in driving genetic variability in plants and other species without early germline segregation.

Authors:  Xianqing Jia; Qijun Zhang; Mengmeng Jiang; Ju Huang; Luyao Yu; Milton Brian Traw; Dacheng Tian; Laurence D Hurst; Sihai Yang
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 8.029

6.  Chromosomal variants accumulate in genomes of the spontaneous aborted fetuses revealed by chromosomal microarray analysis.

Authors:  Sen Li; Lei-Ling Chen; Xing-Hua Wang; Hai-Jing Zhu; Xiao-Long Li; Xie Feng; Lei Guo; Xiang-Hong Ou; Jun-Yu Ma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.