Literature DB >> 20416333

Disruption of conditioned reward association by typical and atypical antipsychotics.

C L Danna1, G I Elmer.   

Abstract

Antipsychotic drugs are broadly classified into typical and atypical compounds; they vary in their pharmacological profile however a common component is their antagonist effects at the D2 dopamine receptors (DRD2). Unfortunately, diminished DRD2 activation is generally thought to be associated with the severity of neuroleptic-induced anhedonia. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine and typical antipsychotic haloperidol in a paradigm that reflects the learned transfer of incentive motivational properties to previously neutral stimuli, namely autoshaping. In order to provide a dosing comparison to a therapeutically relevant endpoint, both drugs were tested against amphetamine-induced disruption of prepulse inhibition as well. In the autoshaping task, rats were exposed to repeated pairings of stimuli that were differentially predictive of reward delivery. Conditioned approach to the reward-predictive cue (sign-tracking) and to the reward (goal-tracking) increased during repeated pairings in the vehicle treated rats. Haloperidol and olanzapine completely abolished this behavior at relatively low doses (100microg/kg). This same dose was the threshold dose for each drug to antagonize the sensorimotor gating deficits produced by amphetamine. At lower doses (3-30microg/kg) both drugs produced a dose-dependent decrease in conditioned approach to the reward-predictive cue. There was no difference between drugs at this dose range which indicates that olanzapine disrupts autoshaping at a significantly lower proposed DRD2 receptor occupancy. Interestingly, neither drug disrupted conditioned approach to the reward at the same dose range that disrupted conditioned approach to the reward-predictive cue. Thus, haloperidol and olanzapine, at doses well below what is considered therapeutically relevant, disrupts the attribution of incentive motivational value to previously neutral cues. Drug effects on this dimension of reward processing are an important consideration in the development of future pharmacological treatments for schizophrenia. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20416333      PMCID: PMC3752986          DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2010.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav        ISSN: 0091-3057            Impact factor:   3.533


  48 in total

1.  Individual differences in pavlovian autoshaping of lever pressing in rats predict stress-induced corticosterone release and mesolimbic levels of monoamines.

Authors:  A Tomie; A S Aguado; L A Pohorecky; D Benjamin
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.533

2.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 3.  Dopamine D(2) receptors and their role in atypical antipsychotic action: still necessary and may even be sufficient.

Authors:  S Kapur; G Remington
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 4.  Dopamine receptor pharmacology.

Authors:  P Seeman; H H Van Tol
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 14.819

5.  Adverse subjective experience with antipsychotics and its relationship to striatal and extrastriatal D2 receptors: a PET study in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Romina Mizrahi; Pablo Rusjan; Ofer Agid; Ariel Graff; David C Mamo; Robert B Zipursky; Shitij Kapur
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 18.112

6.  Comparative evaluation of conventional and novel antipsychotic drugs with reference to their subjective tolerability, side-effect profile and impact on quality of life.

Authors:  L Voruganti; L Cortese; L Oyewumi; Z Cernovsky; S Zirul; A Awad
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2000-06-16       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 7.  Impact of atypical antipsychotics on quality of life in patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  A George Awad; Lakshmi N P Voruganti
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.749

8.  Decision-making impairments in the context of intact reward sensitivity in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Erin A Heerey; Kimberly R Bell-Warren; James M Gold
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 13.382

9.  Scaling relative incentive value: different adjustments to incentive downshift in pigeons and rats.

Authors:  Santiago Pellegrini; María Florencia López Seal; Mauricio R Papini
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  L-DOPA disrupts activity in the nucleus accumbens during reversal learning in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Roshan Cools; Simon J G Lewis; Luke Clark; Roger A Barker; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 7.853

View more
  38 in total

Review 1.  Contemporary approaches to neural circuit manipulation and mapping: focus on reward and addiction.

Authors:  Benjamin T Saunders; Jocelyn M Richard; Patricia H Janak
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Experimental predictions drawn from a computational model of sign-trackers and goal-trackers.

Authors:  Florian Lesaint; Olivier Sigaud; Jeremy J Clark; Shelly B Flagel; Mehdi Khamassi
Journal:  J Physiol Paris       Date:  2014-06-20

3.  Examining the role of dopamine D2 and D3 receptors in Pavlovian conditioned approach behaviors.

Authors:  Kurt M Fraser; Joshua L Haight; Eliot L Gardner; Shelly B Flagel
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Continuous, but not intermittent, antipsychotic drug delivery intensifies the pursuit of reward cues.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Bédard; Jérôme Maheux; Daniel Lévesque; Anne-Noël Samaha
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 7.853

5.  Motivational Context Modulates Prediction Error Response in Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jenna M Reinen; Jared X Van Snellenberg; Guillermo Horga; Anissa Abi-Dargham; Nathaniel D Daw; Daphna Shohamy
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 9.306

6.  DRD2 polymorphisms modulate reward and emotion processing, dopamine neurotransmission and openness to experience.

Authors:  Marta Peciña; Brian J Mickey; Tiffany Love; Heng Wang; Scott A Langenecker; Colin Hodgkinson; Pei-Hong Shen; Sandra Villafuerte; David Hsu; Sara L Weisenbach; Christian S Stohler; David Goldman; Jon-Kar Zubieta
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Residual dopamine receptor desensitization following either high- or low-dose sub-chronic prior exposure to the atypical anti-psychotic drug olanzapine.

Authors:  Flávia Regina Cruz Dias; Liana Wermelinger de Matos; Maria de Fátima Dos Santos Sampaio; Robert J Carey; Marinete Pinheiro Carrera
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 8.  Individual variation in resisting temptation: implications for addiction.

Authors:  Benjamin T Saunders; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  A food predictive cue must be attributed with incentive salience for it to induce c-fos mRNA expression in cortico-striatal-thalamic brain regions.

Authors:  S B Flagel; C M Cameron; K N Pickup; S J Watson; H Akil; T E Robinson
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Individual variation in incentive salience attribution and accumbens dopamine transporter expression and function.

Authors:  Bryan F Singer; Bipasha Guptaroy; Curtis J Austin; Isabella Wohl; Vedran Lovic; Jillian L Seiler; Roxanne A Vaughan; Margaret E Gnegy; Terry E Robinson; Brandon J Aragona
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.