Jenna M Reinen1,2, Jared X Van Snellenberg3,4, Guillermo Horga3,4, Anissa Abi-Dargham3,4, Nathaniel D Daw5, Daphna Shohamy1,6. 1. Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY. 2. Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT. 3. Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY. 4. Division of Translational Imaging, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY. 5. Princeton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ. 6. Zuckerman Mind, Brain, Behavior Institute and Kavli Center for Brain Science, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent findings demonstrate that patients with schizophrenia are worse at learning to predict rewards than losses, suggesting that motivational context modulates learning in this disease. However, these findings derive from studies in patients treated with antipsychotic medications, D2 receptor antagonists that may interfere with the neural systems that underlie motivation and learning. Thus, it remains unknown how motivational context affects learning in schizophrenia, separate from the effects of medication. METHODS: To examine the impact of motivational context on learning in schizophrenia, we tested 16 unmedicated patients with schizophrenia and 23 matched controls on a probabilistic learning task while they underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) under 2 conditions: one in which they pursued rewards, and one in which they avoided losses. Computational models were used to derive trial-by-trial prediction error responses to feedback. RESULTS: Patients performed worse than controls on the learning task overall, but there were no behavioral effects of condition. FMRI revealed an attenuated prediction error response in patients in the medial prefrontal cortex, striatum, and medial temporal lobe when learning to predict rewards, but not when learning to avoid losses. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with schizophrenia showed differences in learning-related brain activity when learning to predict rewards, but not when learning to avoid losses. Together with prior work, these results suggest that motivational deficits related to learning in schizophrenia are characteristic of the disease and not solely a result of antipsychotic treatment.
BACKGROUND: Recent findings demonstrate that patients with schizophrenia are worse at learning to predict rewards than losses, suggesting that motivational context modulates learning in this disease. However, these findings derive from studies in patients treated with antipsychotic medications, D2 receptor antagonists that may interfere with the neural systems that underlie motivation and learning. Thus, it remains unknown how motivational context affects learning in schizophrenia, separate from the effects of medication. METHODS: To examine the impact of motivational context on learning in schizophrenia, we tested 16 unmedicated patients with schizophrenia and 23 matched controls on a probabilistic learning task while they underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) under 2 conditions: one in which they pursued rewards, and one in which they avoided losses. Computational models were used to derive trial-by-trial prediction error responses to feedback. RESULTS:Patients performed worse than controls on the learning task overall, but there were no behavioral effects of condition. FMRI revealed an attenuated prediction error response in patients in the medial prefrontal cortex, striatum, and medial temporal lobe when learning to predict rewards, but not when learning to avoid losses. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with schizophrenia showed differences in learning-related brain activity when learning to predict rewards, but not when learning to avoid losses. Together with prior work, these results suggest that motivational deficits related to learning in schizophrenia are characteristic of the disease and not solely a result of antipsychotic treatment.
Authors: Jana Wrase; Thorsten Kahnt; Florian Schlagenhauf; Anne Beck; Michael X Cohen; Brian Knutson; Andreas Heinz Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2007-04-05 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Jenna Reinen; Edward E Smith; Catherine Insel; Robert Kribs; Daphna Shohamy; Tor D Wager; L Fredrik Jarskog Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2013-12-13 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Victoria B Gradin; Poornima Kumar; Gordon Waiter; Trevor Ahearn; Catriona Stickle; Marteen Milders; Ian Reid; Jeremy Hall; J Douglas Steele Journal: Brain Date: 2011-04-10 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Jared X Van Snellenberg; Andrew R A Conway; Julie Spicer; Christina Read; Edward E Smith Journal: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Robb B Rutledge; Stephanie C Lazzaro; Brian Lau; Catherine E Myers; Mark A Gluck; Paul W Glimcher Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2009-12-02 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Daphna Shohamy; Perry Mihalakos; Ronald Chin; Binu Thomas; Anthony D Wagner; Carol Tamminga Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2009-12-24 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Krista M Wisner; Joshua Chiappelli; Anya Savransky; Feven Fisseha; Laura M Rowland; Peter Kochunov; L Elliot Hong Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 3.978
Authors: Henry W Chase; Polina Loriemi; Tobias Wensing; Simon B Eickhoff; Thomas Nickl-Jockschat Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2018-03-24 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: James A Waltz; Ziye Xu; Elliot C Brown; Rebecca R Ruiz; Michael J Frank; James M Gold Journal: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging Date: 2017-08-12
Authors: Franklin R Schneier; Mark Slifstein; Alexis E Whitton; Diego A Pizzagalli; Jenna Reinen; Patrick J McGrath; Dan V Iosifescu; Anissa Abi-Dargham Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2018-05-25 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Junghee Lee; Amy M Jimenez; Eric A Reavis; William P Horan; Jonathan K Wynn; Michael F Green Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2019-04-25 Impact factor: 9.306