Literature DB >> 15521791

Impact of atypical antipsychotics on quality of life in patients with schizophrenia.

A George Awad1, Lakshmi N P Voruganti.   

Abstract

Schizophrenia is a long-term disabling illness that affects approximately 1% of the population. Its course is generally chronic with acute psychotic exacerbations that may require frequent hospitalisations. The clinical picture includes a range of symptoms such as delusions, hallucinations, agitation, suspiciousness, hostility, conceptual disorganisation, blunted affect, emotional and social withdrawal, lack of spontaneity, poverty of speech and a wide range of neurocognitive deficits. Over the past 50 years, antipsychotic medications have emerged as the cornerstone of management in concert with other important interventions, such as psychosocial and economic support and rehabilitation efforts. However, the unrivalled role of conventional antipsychotic medications has been continuously challenged by the wide range of adverse effects of these medications and their lack of usefulness in the treatment of neurocognitive deficits as well as deficit and negative symptoms. In addition, the lack of subjective tolerability of these agents and their negative impact on quality of life have complicated management for a large number of patients. Over the last 15 years, several new atypical antipsychotic medications have been introduced, including amisulpride, remoxipride, risperidone, sertindole, olanzapine, zotepine, quetiapine, ziprasidone and aripiprazole. In general, the new antipsychotics have shown themselves to be at least comparable in efficacy to conventional antipsychotics but with superior subjective tolerability and a more favourable adverse effect profile. The majority of quality of life studies involving new antipsychotic agents have evaluated the benefits of risperidone, olanzapine and clozapine; only a few studies have examined the effects of other new antipsychotics. While most of these studies have methodological and design limitations, the weight of evidence from them nevertheless points to a trend towards a more positive impact on quality of life with atypical agents. A number of recommendations can be made. First, more independent well designed and controlled studies are urgently needed to evaluate the effects of antipsychotic therapy on quality of life in patients with schizophrenia. New comparative studies should explore not only the differences between new and old antipsychotics but also identify any potential differences between individual new agents. The role of cost-effectiveness studies such as cost utility approaches in schizophrenia needs to be revisited, notwithstanding the fact that these types of studies have been reported to be feasible in schizophrenia. Finally, quality-of-life-based pharmacoeconomic studies of antipsychotic agents should not concentrate solely on cost reduction or containment, as it is likely that in order to maximise the benefits of new antipsychotic medications, greater expenditure on rehabilitation programmes and other support services will be necessary in the short-term at least.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15521791     DOI: 10.2165/00023210-200418130-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CNS Drugs        ISSN: 1172-7047            Impact factor:   5.749


  89 in total

1.  Subjective experience and striatal dopamine D(2) receptor occupancy in patients with schizophrenia stabilized by olanzapine or risperidone.

Authors:  L de Haan; J Lavalaye; D Linszen; P M Dingemans; J Booij
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 18.112

2.  The relationship of symptoms and level of functioning in schizophrenia to general wellbeing and the Quality of Life Scale.

Authors:  R M Norman; A K Malla; T McLean; L P Voruganti; L Cortese; E McIntosh; S Cheng; A Rickwood
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.392

3.  Intervention research in psychosis: issues related to the assessment of quality of life.

Authors:  A G Awad; L N Voruganti
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 9.306

4.  A clinical evaluation of risperidone in the treatment of schizophrenia: a 10-week, open-label, multicenter trial. ARCS Study Group. Assessment of Risperdal in a Clinical Setting.

Authors:  D V Jeste; M Klausner; M Brecher; C Clyde; R Jones
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  Pharmacoeconomics of antipsychotic drug therapy.

Authors:  W A Hargreaves; M Shumway
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.384

6.  Clozapine for the treatment-resistant schizophrenic. A double-blind comparison with chlorpromazine.

Authors:  J Kane; G Honigfeld; J Singer; H Meltzer
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1988-09

7.  Comparative evaluation of conventional and novel antipsychotic drugs with reference to their subjective tolerability, side-effect profile and impact on quality of life.

Authors:  L Voruganti; L Cortese; L Oyewumi; Z Cernovsky; S Zirul; A Awad
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2000-06-16       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Hospital days in clozapine-treated patients.

Authors:  R A Dickson; J T Dalby; R Williams; S J Warden
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.356

9.  Impact of antipsychotic agents and their side effects on the quality of life in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Michael Ritsner; Rena Kurs
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 10.  Neuroleptic dysphoria: towards a new synthesis.

Authors:  L Voruganti; A G Awad
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-11-27       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  32 in total

Review 1.  Overdose of atypical antipsychotics: clinical presentation, mechanisms of toxicity and management.

Authors:  Michael Levine; Anne-Michelle Ruha
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 5.749

2.  Ten-year quality of life outcomes among patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder II. Predictive value of psychosocial factors.

Authors:  Michael S Ritsner; Marina Arbitman; Alexander Lisker; Alexander M Ponizovsky
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Second-generation antipsychotic medications and risk of pneumonia in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Chian-Jue Kuo; Shu-Yu Yang; Ya-Tang Liao; Wei J Chen; Wen-Chung Lee; Wen-Yi Shau; Yao-Tung Chang; Shang-Ying Tsai; Chiao-Chicy Chen
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 9.306

4.  Determinants of changes in perceived quality of life in the course of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Michael Ritsner; Anatoly Gibel; Yael Ratner
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Ten-year quality of life outcomes among patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders: I. Predictive value of disorder-related factors.

Authors:  Michael S Ritsner; Alexander Lisker; Marina Arbitman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  Measuring quality of life in patients with schizophrenia: an update.

Authors:  A George Awad; Lakshmi N P Voruganti
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Effects of antipsychotic treatment on psychopathology and motor symptoms. A placebo-controlled study in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Tanja Veselinović; Holger Schorn; Ingo Vernaleken; Katharina Schiffl; Christoph Hiemke; Gerald Zernig; Ruben Gur; Gerhard Gründer
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 8.  Effect of second-generation antipsychotics on cognition: current issues and future challenges.

Authors:  S Kristian Hill; Jeffrey R Bishop; Donna Palumbo; John A Sweeney
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.618

Review 9.  Are second generation antipsychotics a distinct class?

Authors:  Caroline Bonham; Christopher Abbott
Journal:  J Psychiatr Pract       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.325

Review 10.  The estimation of utility weights in cost-utility analysis for mental disorders: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael Sonntag; Hans-Helmut König; Alexander Konnopka
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.