INTRODUCTION: African American men have the highest rates of prostate cancer of any racial group, but very little is known about the psychological functioning of African American men in response to prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment. PURPOSE: In this secondary analysis of a national trial testing a psychological intervention for prostate cancer patients, we report on the traumatic stress symptoms of African American and non-African American men. METHODS: This analysis includes 317 men (African American: n = 30, 9%; non-African American: n = 287, 91%) who were enrolled in the intervention trial, which included 12 weeks of group psychotherapy and 24 months of follow-up. Using mixed model analysis, total score on the Impact of Events Scale (IES) and its Intrusion and Avoidance subscales were examined to determine mean differences in traumatic stress across all time points (0, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months). In an additional analysis, relevant psychosocial, demographic, and clinical variables were added to the model. RESULTS: Results showed significantly higher levels of traumatic stress for African American men compared to non-African American men in all models independently of the intervention arm, demographics, and relevant clinical variables. African Americans also had a consistently higher prevalence of clinically significant traumatic stress symptoms (defined as IES total score ≥ 27). These elevations remained across all time points over 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to show a racial disparity in traumatic stress specifically as an aspect of overall psychological adjustment to prostate cancer. Recommendations are made for appropriate assessment, referral, and treatment of psychological distress in this vulnerable population.
INTRODUCTION: African American men have the highest rates of prostate cancer of any racial group, but very little is known about the psychological functioning of African American men in response to prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment. PURPOSE: In this secondary analysis of a national trial testing a psychological intervention for prostate cancerpatients, we report on the traumatic stress symptoms of African American and non-African American men. METHODS: This analysis includes 317 men (African American: n = 30, 9%; non-African American: n = 287, 91%) who were enrolled in the intervention trial, which included 12 weeks of group psychotherapy and 24 months of follow-up. Using mixed model analysis, total score on the Impact of Events Scale (IES) and its Intrusion and Avoidance subscales were examined to determine mean differences in traumatic stress across all time points (0, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months). In an additional analysis, relevant psychosocial, demographic, and clinical variables were added to the model. RESULTS: Results showed significantly higher levels of traumatic stress for African American men compared to non-African American men in all models independently of the intervention arm, demographics, and relevant clinical variables. African Americans also had a consistently higher prevalence of clinically significant traumatic stress symptoms (defined as IES total score ≥ 27). These elevations remained across all time points over 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to show a racial disparity in traumatic stress specifically as an aspect of overall psychological adjustment to prostate cancer. Recommendations are made for appropriate assessment, referral, and treatment of psychological distress in this vulnerable population.
Authors: Neomi Vin-Raviv; Grace Clarke Hillyer; Dawn L Hershman; Sandro Galea; Nicole Leoce; Dana H Bovbjerg; Lawrence H Kushi; Candyce Kroenke; Lois Lamerato; Christine B Ambrosone; Heidis Valdimorsdottir; Lina Jandorf; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Wei-Yann Tsai; Alfred I Neugut Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2013-02-21 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Andrew G Matthew; Shabbir M H Alibhai; Tal Davidson; Kristen L Currie; Haiyan Jiang; Murray Krahn; Neil E Fleshner; Robin Kalnin; Alyssa S Louis; B Joyce Davison; John Trachtenberg Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2014-03-09 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Charles Kamen; Karen M Mustian; Charles Heckler; Michelle C Janelsins; Luke J Peppone; Supriya Mohile; James M McMahon; Raymond Lord; Patrick J Flynn; Matthias Weiss; David Spiegel; Gary R Morrow Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2015-01-21 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Daphne R Friedman; Vikas Patil; Chunyang Li; Kelli M Rassmussen; Zachary Burningham; Susan Hamilton-Hill; Michael J Kelley; Ahmad S Halwani Journal: JCO Clin Cancer Inform Date: 2022-02
Authors: Sharon A Cook; Peter Salmon; Graham Dunn; Chris Holcombe; Philip Cornford; Peter Fisher Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2014-08-18 Impact factor: 4.267