Literature DB >> 20412544

Economic implications of 21-gene breast cancer risk assay from the perspective of an Israeli-managed health-care organization.

Shmuel H Klang1, Ariel Hammerman, Nicky Liebermann, Noa Efrat, Julie Doberne, John Hornberger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Oncotype DX, a 21-gene assay, was clinically validated as a predictor of 10-year recurrence-free survival and treatment response in patients with early-stage estrogen-receptor-positive, lymph-node negative breast cancer (ER+ LN- ESBC). This study determined "real-life" alteration in treatment decision and economic implications of Oncotype DX use in women with ER+ LN- ESBC.
METHODS: Clalit Health Services (CHS, Tel Aviv, Israel), determined the proportion of women in low, intermediate and high-risk groups in the first 368 Oncotype DX assays performed, the change of adjuvant therapy recommendation following the recurrence (RS) results from Oncotype DX use, and associated chemotherapy costs. The risk of recurrence-free survival was derived from prespecified statistical protocols of NCI-sponsored trials conducted by NSABP (B-14 and B-20). Utilities were literature based. A 3% discount rate was employed.
RESULTS: Oncotype DX altered recommendations of 40% of patients, 84% of whom were changed from hormone + chemotherapy to hormonal therapy alone. Among high-risk women, 8% switched actual treatment from hormonal therapy to hormone + chemotherapy. By reducing the chemotherapy disutility, quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) increased 0.170 years. Use of Oncotype DX costs $10,770 per QALY gained. Sensitivity analyses revealed that risk reduction in the low-risk population, the cost of adverse events, and the relative risk reduction of recurrence were the most influential variables.
CONCLUSION: Oncotype DX resulted in net QALY gain and increased overall costs, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $10,770. For CHS, Oncotype DX represents an effective and affordable approach to favorably affect the lives of women with ESBC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20412544     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00724.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  41 in total

1.  Why does Oncotype DX recurrence score reduce adjuvant chemotherapy use?

Authors:  Jeffrey G Schneider; Danny N Khalil
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of the 21-Gene Assay in Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.

Authors:  Shi-Yi Wang; Weixiong Dang; Ilana Richman; Sarah S Mougalian; Suzanne B Evans; Cary P Gross
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Cost Effectiveness of Gene Expression Profile Testing in Community Practice.

Authors:  Young Chandler; Clyde B Schechter; Jinani Jayasekera; Aimee Near; Suzanne C O'Neill; Claudine Isaacs; Charles E Phelps; G Thomas Ray; Tracy A Lieu; Scott Ramsey; Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  US Insurance Program's Experience With a Multigene Assay for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  John Hornberger; Rebecca Chien; Katie Krebs; Louis Hochheiser
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 5.  The application of Oncotype DX in early-stage lymph-node-positive disease.

Authors:  Sarika Jain; William J Gradishar
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  Impact of Recurrence Score on type and duration of chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  K Willemsma; W Yip; N LeVasseur; K Dobosz; C Illmann; S Baxter; C Lohrisch; C E Simmons
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 7.  Diagnostic tests based on gene expression profile in breast cancer: from background to clinical use.

Authors:  Laura Zanotti; Alberto Bottini; Camillo Rossi; Daniele Generali; Maria Rosa Cappelletti
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-07-23

8.  Differential patterns of recurrence and specific survival between luminal A and luminal B breast cancer according to recent changes in the 2013 St Gallen immunohistochemical classification.

Authors:  A García Fernández; C Chabrera; M García Font; M Fraile; J M Lain; S Gónzalez; I Barco; C González; J Torres; M Piqueras; L Cirera; E Veloso; A Pessarrodona; N Giménez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.405

9.  Cost effectiveness of a 21-gene recurrence score assay versus Canadian clinical practice in post-menopausal women with early-stage estrogen or progesterone-receptor-positive, axillary lymph-node positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Malek B Hannouf; Bin Xie; Muriel Brackstone; Gregory S Zaric
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Adjuvant Chemotherapy Use and Health Care Costs After Introduction of Genomic Testing in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Andrew J Epstein; Yu-Ning Wong; Nandita Mitra; Anil Vachani; Sakhena Hin; Lin Yang; Aaron Smith-McLallen; Katrina Armstrong; Peter W Groeneveld
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.