Literature DB >> 20410027

Males of the orb-web spider Argiope bruennichi sacrifice themselves to unrelated females.

Klaas W Welke1, Jutta M Schneider.   

Abstract

Costs of inbreeding can lead to total reproductive failure and inbreeding avoidance is, therefore, common. In classical sex roles with no paternal care, the selective pressure to avoid inbreeding is mostly on the female, which carries the higher costs. In some orb-web spiders, this situation is very different because females are polyandrous and males are monogynous or at most bigynous. Additionally, females of many entelegyne orb weavers are thought to bias paternity post-copulatorily towards a desired mate. This increases the selective pressure on males to adjust their investment in a mating with regard to the compatibility to a female. Here, we examine whether genetic relatedness influences mating behaviour in the orb-web spider Argiope bruennichi. We mated either a sibling or a non-sibling male to a female in single copulation trials and compared copulation duration, cannibalism rate and female fecundity. Our experiment revealed that males prolonged their copulation duration and were cannibalized more frequently when mating with a non-sibling female. Males mating with a sibling female were more likely to escape cannibalism by copulating briefly, thus presumably increasing their chances of re-mating with a more compatible female. This suggests that males can adaptively adjust their investment relating to the compatibility of a female.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20410027      PMCID: PMC2936157          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  14 in total

Review 1.  Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits.

Authors:  M D Jennions; M Petrie
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2000-02

2.  The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.844

3.  A model for the evolutionary maintenance of monogyny in spiders.

Authors:  Lutz Fromhage; John M McNamara; Alasdair I Houston
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  Polyandry facilitates postcopulatory inbreeding avoidance in house mice.

Authors:  Renée C Firman; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-12-10       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Courtship raises male fertilization success through post-mating sexual selection in a spider.

Authors:  Jutta M Schneider; Kristiani Lesmono
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Inbreeding avoidance in animals.

Authors:  A Pusey; M Wolf
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Females increase offspring heterozygosity and fitness through extra-pair matings.

Authors:  Katharina Foerster; Kaspar Delhey; Arild Johnsen; Jan T Lifjeld; Bart Kempenaers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-10-16       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Inbreeding avoidance in spiders: evidence for rescue effect in fecundity of female spiders with outbreeding opportunity.

Authors:  T Bilde; A A Maklakov; N Schilling
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.411

9.  Kin recognition in zebrafish: a 24-hour window for olfactory imprinting.

Authors:  Gabriele Gerlach; Andrea Hodgins-Davis; Carla Avolio; Celia Schunter
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Inbreeding depresses short and long distance dispersal in three congeneric spiders.

Authors:  Dries Bonte
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.411

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Inbreeding and the evolution of sociality in arthropods.

Authors:  Seyed Mohammad Tabadkani; Jamasb Nozari; Mathieu Lihoreau
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2012-08-23

Review 2.  Sexual cannibalism as a manifestation of sexual conflict.

Authors:  Jutta M Schneider
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  Meta-analytic evidence that animals rarely avoid inbreeding.

Authors:  Raïssa A de Boer; Regina Vega-Trejo; Alexander Kotrschal; John L Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 15.460

4.  Conditional monogyny: female quality predicts male faithfulness.

Authors:  Klaas W Welke; Stefanie M Zimmer; Jutta M Schneider
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.172

5.  Rapid range expansion is not restricted by inbreeding in a sexually cannibalistic spider.

Authors:  Stefanie M Zimmer; Henrik Krehenwinkel; Jutta M Schneider
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Mate availability does not influence mating strategies in males of the sexually cannibalistic spider Argiope bruennichi.

Authors:  Anna-Lena Cory; Jutta M Schneider
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  An Economic Dilemma Between Molecular Weapon Systems May Explain an Arachno-atypical Venom in Wasp Spiders (Argiope bruennichi).

Authors:  Tim Lüddecke; Björn M von Reumont; Frank Förster; André Billion; Thomas Timm; Günter Lochnit; Andreas Vilcinskas; Sarah Lemke
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-06-30

8.  Family-specific chemical profiles provide potential kin recognition cues in the sexually cannibalistic spider Argiope bruennichi.

Authors:  Katharina Weiss; Jutta M Schneider
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.812

9.  Exploiting a moment of weakness: male spiders escape sexual cannibalism by copulating with moulting females.

Authors:  Gabriele Uhl; Stefanie M Zimmer; Dirk Renner; Jutta M Schneider
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Socially cued developmental plasticity in web-building spiders.

Authors:  Rainer Neumann; Jutta M Schneider
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.