Virginia T LeBaron1, Amanda Cooke2, Jonathan Resmini3, Alexander Garinther4, Vinca Chow5, Rebecca Quiñones6, Sarah Noveroske6, Andrew Baccari7, Patrick T Smith8, John Peteet6, Tracy A Balboni6, Michael J Balboni6. 1. 1 University of Virginia School of Nursing , Charlottesville, Virginia. 2. 3 Beth Israel Deaconness Medical Center , Boston, Massachusetts. 3. 4 Boston University School of Theology , Boston, Massachusetts. 4. 5 Boston College , Boston, Massachusetts. 5. 6 Brigham & Women's Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts. 6. 2 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Cancer Center , Boston, Massachusetts. 7. 7 Harvard Divinity School , Boston, Massachusetts. 8. 8 Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary , Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clergy are often important sources of guidance for patients and family members making medical decisions at the end-of-life (EOL). Previous research revealed spiritual support by religious communities led to more aggressive care at the EOL, particularly among minority patients. Understanding this phenomenon is important to help address disparities in EOL care. OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to explore and describe clergy perspectives regarding "good" versus "poor" death within the participant's spiritual tradition. METHODS: This was a qualitative, descriptive study. Community clergy from various spiritual backgrounds, geographical locations within the United States, and races/ethnicities were recruited. Participants included 35 clergy who participated in one-on-one interviews (N = 14) and two focus groups (N = 21). Semistructured interviews explored clergy viewpoints on factors related to a "good death." Principles of grounded theory were used to identify a final set of themes and subthemes. RESULTS: A good death was characterized by wholeness and certainty and emphasized being in relationship with God. Conversely, a "poor death" was characterized by separation, doubt, and isolation. Clergy identified four primary determinants of good versus poor death: dignity, preparedness, physical suffering, and community. Participants expressed appreciation for contextual factors that affect the death experience; some described a "middle death," or one that integrates both positive and negative elements. Location of death was not viewed as a significant contributing factor. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding clergy perspectives regarding quality of death can provide important insights to help improve EOL care, particularly for patients highly engaged with faith communities. These findings can inform initiatives to foster productive relationships between clergy, clinicians, and congregants and reduce health disparities.
BACKGROUND: Clergy are often important sources of guidance for patients and family members making medical decisions at the end-of-life (EOL). Previous research revealed spiritual support by religious communities led to more aggressive care at the EOL, particularly among minority patients. Understanding this phenomenon is important to help address disparities in EOL care. OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to explore and describe clergy perspectives regarding "good" versus "poor" death within the participant's spiritual tradition. METHODS: This was a qualitative, descriptive study. Community clergy from various spiritual backgrounds, geographical locations within the United States, and races/ethnicities were recruited. Participants included 35 clergy who participated in one-on-one interviews (N = 14) and two focus groups (N = 21). Semistructured interviews explored clergy viewpoints on factors related to a "good death." Principles of grounded theory were used to identify a final set of themes and subthemes. RESULTS: A good death was characterized by wholeness and certainty and emphasized being in relationship with God. Conversely, a "poor death" was characterized by separation, doubt, and isolation. Clergy identified four primary determinants of good versus poor death: dignity, preparedness, physical suffering, and community. Participants expressed appreciation for contextual factors that affect the death experience; some described a "middle death," or one that integrates both positive and negative elements. Location of death was not viewed as a significant contributing factor. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding clergy perspectives regarding quality of death can provide important insights to help improve EOL care, particularly for patients highly engaged with faith communities. These findings can inform initiatives to foster productive relationships between clergy, clinicians, and congregants and reduce health disparities.
Authors: Tracy A Balboni; Lauren C Vanderwerker; Susan D Block; M Elizabeth Paulk; Christopher S Lathan; John R Peteet; Holly G Prigerson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-02-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Andrea C Phelps; Paul K Maciejewski; Matthew Nilsson; Tracy A Balboni; Alexi A Wright; M Elizabeth Paulk; Elizabeth Trice; Deborah Schrag; John R Peteet; Susan D Block; Holly G Prigerson Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-03-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Alexi A Wright; Baohui Zhang; Alaka Ray; Jennifer W Mack; Elizabeth Trice; Tracy Balboni; Susan L Mitchell; Vicki A Jackson; Susan D Block; Paul K Maciejewski; Holly G Prigerson Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-10-08 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Michael J Balboni; Adam Sullivan; Andrea C Enzinger; Patrick T Smith; Christine Mitchell; John R Peteet; James A Tulsky; Tyler VanderWeele; Tracy A Balboni Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2017-02-06 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Emily A Meier; Jarred V Gallegos; Lori P Montross Thomas; Colin A Depp; Scott A Irwin; Dilip V Jeste Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2016-01-22 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Sarah E Koss; Ross Weissman; Vinca Chow; Patrick T Smith; Bethany Slack; Vitaliy Voytenko; Tracy A Balboni; Michael J Balboni Journal: J Relig Health Date: 2018-08
Authors: Justin J Sanders; Vinca Chow; Andrea C Enzinger; Tai-Chung Lam; Patrick T Smith; Rebecca Quiñones; Andrew Baccari; Sarah Philbrick; Gloria White-Hammond; John Peteet; Tracy A Balboni; Michael J Balboni Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2017-04-07 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Michael J Balboni; Adam Sullivan; Patrick T Smith; Danish Zaidi; Christine Mitchell; James A Tulsky; Daniel P Sulmasy; Tyler J VanderWeele; Tracy A Balboni Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2017-08-15 Impact factor: 5.576