Literature DB >> 20405185

24-month clinical evaluation in non-carious cervical lesions of a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive applied using a rubbing motion.

Alessandro D Loguercio1, Jovani Raffo, Fabrício Bassani, Heloiza Balestrini, Dalvan Santo, Roberto César do Amaral, Alessandra Reis.   

Abstract

The aim of this clinical trial was to evaluate the effects of application mode on the clinical performance of a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive in class V cavities over 24 months. Forty patients with at least three similar-sized non-carious cervical lesions participated in this study. A total of 120 restorations with Prime & Bond NT were placed, 40 in each group. The adhesive was applied with no rubbing action, with slight rubbing action, or with vigorous rubbing action. The restorations were placed incrementally using the composite resin Esthet-X. The restorations were evaluated at baseline and after 6, 12, and 24 months following the modified United States Public Health Service criteria. Statistical analysis was conducted using Friedman repeated measures analysis of variance by rank and using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for significance at each pair (α = 0.05). The 24-month retention rates of Prime & Bond NT were 82.5% for the no rubbing group, 82.5% for the slight rubbing group, and 92.5% for vigorous rubbing group. No significant difference in the retention rates in each recall period was detected among groups (p > 0.05); however, the retention rates in the 24-month recall was statistically lower than the baseline only for no rubbing or slight rubbing groups. The use of a vigorous application mode can be a clinical approach to improve the retention of restorations placed in non-carious cervical lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20405185     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-010-0408-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  46 in total

1.  Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges.

Authors:  Bart Van Meerbeek; Jan De Munck; Yasuhiro Yoshida; Satoshi Inoue; Marcos Vargas; Padmini Vijay; Kirsten Van Landuyt; Paul Lambrechts; Guido Vanherle
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.440

2.  Hybridization efficiency of the adhesive/dentin interface with wet bonding.

Authors:  Y Wang; P Spencer
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Electric-current-assisted application of self-etch adhesives to dentin.

Authors:  L Breschi; A Mazzoni; D H Pashley; G Pasquantonio; A Ruggeri; P Suppa; G Mazzotti; R Di Lenarda; F R Tay
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 4.  Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface.

Authors:  Lorenzo Breschi; Annalisa Mazzoni; Alessandra Ruggeri; Milena Cadenaro; Roberto Di Lenarda; Elettra De Stefano Dorigo
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 5.304

5.  Water sorption in a bis(GMA)/TEGDMA resin.

Authors:  K J Söderholm
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1984-03

6.  Effect of water content on the physical properties of model dentine primer and bonding resins.

Authors:  S J Paul; M Leach; F A Rueggeberg; D H Pashley
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Water sorption/solubility of dental adhesive resins.

Authors:  Juliana Malacarne; Ricardo M Carvalho; Mario F de Goes; Nadia Svizero; David H Pashley; Franklin R Tay; Cynthia K Yiu; Marcela Rocha de Oliveira Carrilho; Marcela Rocha de Oliveira Carrilho
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2006-01-06       Impact factor: 5.304

8.  Clinical evaluation of different adhesive systems for restoring teeth with erosion lesions.

Authors:  M Federlin; B Thonemann; G Schmalz; T Urlinger
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  A clinical trial comparing two all-in-one adhesive systems used to restore non-carious cervical lesions: results at one year.

Authors:  M F Burrow; M J Tyas
Journal:  Aust Dent J       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.291

10.  Effects of the acetone content of single solution dentin bonding agents on the adhesive layer thickness and the microtensile bond strength.

Authors:  Byeong-Hoon Cho; Sabine H Dickens
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.304

View more
  6 in total

1.  Effect of sonic application mode on the resin-dentin bond strength and nanoleakage of simplified self-etch adhesive.

Authors:  Alexandra Mena-Serrano; Eugenio Jose Garcia; Alessandro Dourado Loguercio; Alessandra Reis
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Thirty-six-month clinical evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive.

Authors:  Cansu Atalay; Gul Ozgunaltay; Ayse Ruya Yazici
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Durability of bonds and clinical success of adhesive restorations.

Authors:  Ricardo M Carvalho; Adriana P Manso; Saulo Geraldeli; Franklin R Tay; David H Pashley
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.304

4.  The anatomy of non-carious cervical lesions.

Authors:  C Walter; E Kress; H Götz; K Taylor; I Willershausen; A Zampelis
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Treatments for hypersensitive noncarious cervical lesions: a Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning (PEARL) Network randomized clinical effectiveness study.

Authors:  Analia Veitz-Keenan; Julie Ann Barna; Brad Strober; Abigail G Matthews; Damon Collie; Donald Vena; Frederick A Curro; Van P Thompson
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.634

Review 6.  Current perspectives on dental adhesion: (1) Dentin adhesion - not there yet.

Authors:  Jorge Perdigão
Journal:  Jpn Dent Sci Rev       Date:  2020-09-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.