Cansu Atalay1, Gul Ozgunaltay2, Ayse Ruya Yazici2. 1. Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, 06100, Sıhhıye, Ankara, Turkey. cansugulcan@hacettepe.edu.tr. 2. Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, 06100, Sıhhıye, Ankara, Turkey.
Abstract
AIM: The aim of this clinical trial was to evaluate and compare the performance of a universal adhesive with different adhesive strategies in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) over a 36-month period. MATERIAL AND METHOD: One hundred sixty-five NCCLs in 35 patients (13 female, 22 male) with at least 3 lesions each were included in this study. Three groups were formed according to the adhesive strategy used (n = 55): selective-etch mode, etch-and-rinse mode, or self-etch mode of a universal adhesive, Single Bond Universal. The same nanofilled resin composite, Filtek Ultimate, was used for all restorations by a single operator. The restorations were evaluated by two calibrated examiners at baseline and at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months in accordance with the modified USPHS criteria. The chi-square test was used for intergroup comparison and Cochran's Q test for intragroup comparison (∝ = 5%). RESULTS: At 36 months, the recall rate was 98.1% and three restorations, one from each group, had failed because of retention loss (P > 0.05). The self-etch mode group showed 17 bravo scores for both marginal staining and marginal adaptation after 3 years, which was significantly different from the selective-etch and etch-and-rinse groups (P < 0.05). For all groups, the only statistically significant difference was found when baseline and 36-month evaluations were compared in terms of marginal staining (P = 0.000). When the marginal adaptation values at 36 months were compared with those at the baseline, statistically significant differences were found in the etch-and-rinse and self-etch mode groups (P < 0.05). Neither secondary caries nor postoperative sensitivity was observed at any recall. CONCLUSION: All adhesive modes showed similar retention rates. Although all restorations were clinically acceptable, restorations in self-etch mode showed less satisfying performance for marginal staining and marginal adaptation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: At the end of 36 months, the Single Bond Universal adhesive received acceptable scores according to the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. However, clinicians should be aware that its use in self-etch application mode tends to result in marginal staining and marginal deterioration when compared with etch-and-rinse and selective-etch application modes.
AIM: The aim of this clinical trial was to evaluate and compare the performance of a universal adhesive with different adhesive strategies in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) over a 36-month period. MATERIAL AND METHOD: One hundred sixty-five NCCLs in 35 patients (13 female, 22 male) with at least 3 lesions each were included in this study. Three groups were formed according to the adhesive strategy used (n = 55): selective-etch mode, etch-and-rinse mode, or self-etch mode of a universal adhesive, Single Bond Universal. The same nanofilled resin composite, Filtek Ultimate, was used for all restorations by a single operator. The restorations were evaluated by two calibrated examiners at baseline and at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months in accordance with the modified USPHS criteria. The chi-square test was used for intergroup comparison and Cochran's Q test for intragroup comparison (∝ = 5%). RESULTS: At 36 months, the recall rate was 98.1% and three restorations, one from each group, had failed because of retention loss (P > 0.05). The self-etch mode group showed 17 bravo scores for both marginal staining and marginal adaptation after 3 years, which was significantly different from the selective-etch and etch-and-rinse groups (P < 0.05). For all groups, the only statistically significant difference was found when baseline and 36-month evaluations were compared in terms of marginal staining (P = 0.000). When the marginal adaptation values at 36 months were compared with those at the baseline, statistically significant differences were found in the etch-and-rinse and self-etch mode groups (P < 0.05). Neither secondary caries nor postoperative sensitivity was observed at any recall. CONCLUSION: All adhesive modes showed similar retention rates. Although all restorations were clinically acceptable, restorations in self-etch mode showed less satisfying performance for marginal staining and marginal adaptation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: At the end of 36 months, the Single Bond Universal adhesive received acceptable scores according to the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. However, clinicians should be aware that its use in self-etch application mode tends to result in marginal staining and marginal deterioration when compared with etch-and-rinse and selective-etch application modes.
Authors: Y Yoshida; K Yoshihara; N Nagaoka; S Hayakawa; Y Torii; T Ogawa; A Osaka; B Van Meerbeek Journal: J Dent Res Date: 2012-02-01 Impact factor: 6.116
Authors: John R Gallo; John O Burgess; Alan H Ripps; Richard S Walker; Edward J Ireland; Donald E Mercante; Jessica M Davidson Journal: Oper Dent Date: 2005 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.440
Authors: Nathaniel C Lawson; Augusto Robles; Chin-Chuan Fu; Chee Paul Lin; Kanchan Sawlani; John O Burgess Journal: J Dent Date: 2015-07-29 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Isabel Cristina Celerino de Moraes Porto; Arthur Bezerra de Barros Rocha; Iverson Iago Soares Ferreira; Bruna Muritiba de Barros; Eryck Canabarra Ávila; Matheus Corrêa da Silva; Marcos Paulo Santana de Oliveira; Teresa de Lisieux Guedes Ferreira Lôbo; José Marcos Dos Santos Oliveira; Ticiano Gomes do Nascimento; Jeniffer Mclaine Duarte de Freitas; Johnnatan Duarte de Freitas Journal: Heliyon Date: 2021-02-19
Authors: Rossana Aboud Matos de Almeida; Suellen Nogueira Linares Lima; Maria Vitória Nassif; Natanael Henrique Ribeiro Mattos; Thalita Paris de Matos; Rudys Rodolfo de Jesus Tavarez; Andres Felipe Millan Cardenas; Matheus Coelho Bandeca; Alessandro D Loguercio Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2022-09-06 Impact factor: 3.606