Literature DB >> 20404181

Postreplication gaps at UV lesions are signals for checkpoint activation.

A John Callegari1, Emily Clark, Amanda Pneuman, Thomas J Kelly.   

Abstract

Exposure of eukaryotic cells to UV light induces a checkpoint response that delays cell-cycle progression after cells enter S phase. It has been hypothesized that this checkpoint response provides time for repair by signaling the presence of structures generated when the replication fork encounters UV-induced DNA damage. To gain insight into the nature of the signaling structures, we used time-lapse microscopy to determine the effects of deficiencies in translesion DNA polymerases on the checkpoint response of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. We found that disruption of the genes encoding translesion DNA polymerases Polkappa and Poleta significantly prolonged the checkpoint response, indicating that the substrates of these enzymes are signals for checkpoint activation. Surprisingly, we found no evidence that the translesion polymerases Rev1 and Polzeta repair structures that are recognized by the checkpoint despite their role in maintaining viability after UV irradiation. Quantitative flow cytometry revealed that cells lacking translesion polymerases replicate UV-damaged DNA at the same rate at WT cells, indicating that the enhanced checkpoint response of cells lacking Polkappa and Poleta is not the result of stalled replication forks. These observations support a model in which postreplication DNA gaps with unrepaired UV lesions in the template strand act both as substrates for translesion polymerases and as signals for checkpoint activation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20404181      PMCID: PMC2889594          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1003449107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  41 in total

1.  A sliding clamp model for the Rad1 family of cell cycle checkpoint proteins.

Authors:  M P Thelen; C Venclovas; K Fidelis
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-03-19       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Removal of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers by the UV damage repair and nucleotide excision repair pathways of Schizosaccharomyces pombe at nucleotide resolution.

Authors:  M Lombaerts; M Tijsterman; J A Brandsma; R A Verhage; J Brouwer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Cell cycle progression in the presence of irreparable DNA damage is controlled by a Mec1- and Rad53-dependent checkpoint in budding yeast.

Authors:  H Neecke; G Lucchini; M P Longhese
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-08-16       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Identification of residues critical for the polymerase activity of the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I from Escherichia coli.

Authors:  A H Polesky; T A Steitz; N D Grindley; C M Joyce
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1990-08-25       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  S-phase-specific activation of Cds1 kinase defines a subpathway of the checkpoint response in Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

Authors:  H D Lindsay; D J Griffiths; R J Edwards; P U Christensen; J M Murray; F Osman; N Walworth; A M Carr
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1998-02-01       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  The relative roles in vivo of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pol eta, Pol zeta, Rev1 protein and Pol32 in the bypass and mutation induction of an abasic site, T-T (6-4) photoadduct and T-T cis-syn cyclobutane dimer.

Authors:  Peter E M Gibbs; John McDonald; Roger Woodgate; Christopher W Lawrence
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Ultraviolet radiation-mediated damage to cellular DNA.

Authors:  Jean Cadet; Evelyne Sage; Thierry Douki
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  Efficient bypass of a thymine-thymine dimer by yeast DNA polymerase, Poleta.

Authors:  R E Johnson; S Prakash; L Prakash
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-02-12       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The Schizosaccharomyces pombe S-phase checkpoint differentiates between different types of DNA damage.

Authors:  N Rhind; P Russell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Repair of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers and 6-4 photoproducts in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

Authors:  S McCready; A M Carr; A R Lehmann
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.501

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Replicating damaged DNA in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Nimrat Chatterjee; Wolfram Siede
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 10.005

2.  Repriming of DNA synthesis at stalled replication forks by human PrimPol.

Authors:  Silvana Mourón; Sara Rodriguez-Acebes; María I Martínez-Jiménez; Sara García-Gómez; Sandra Chocrón; Luis Blanco; Juan Méndez
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2013-11-17       Impact factor: 15.369

3.  The DNA damage response kinases DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) and ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) Are stimulated by bulky adduct-containing DNA.

Authors:  Michael G Kemp; Laura A Lindsey-Boltz; Aziz Sancar
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  Genetic instability in budding and fission yeast-sources and mechanisms.

Authors:  Adrianna Skoneczna; Aneta Kaniak; Marek Skoneczny
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 16.408

Review 5.  Eukaryotic Translesion DNA Synthesis on the Leading and Lagging Strands: Unique Detours around the Same Obstacle.

Authors:  Mark Hedglin; Stephen J Benkovic
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 60.622

6.  Translesion synthesis polymerases contribute to meiotic chromosome segregation and cohesin dynamics in S chizosaccharomyces pombe.

Authors:  Tara L Mastro; Vishnu P Tripathi; Susan L Forsburg
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 7.  ATR: a master conductor of cellular responses to DNA replication stress.

Authors:  Rachel Litman Flynn; Lee Zou
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 13.807

Review 8.  New insights into replisome fluidity during chromosome replication.

Authors:  Isabel Kurth; Mike O'Donnell
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 13.807

9.  Activation of DNA damage repair pathways in response to nitrogen mustard-induced DNA damage and toxicity in skin keratinocytes.

Authors:  Swetha Inturi; Neera Tewari-Singh; Chapla Agarwal; Carl W White; Rajesh Agarwal
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  Cell cycle stage-specific roles of Rad18 in tolerance and repair of oxidative DNA damage.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Michael Durando; Stephanie L Smith-Roe; Chris Sproul; Alicia M Greenwalt; William Kaufmann; Sehyun Oh; Eric A Hendrickson; Cyrus Vaziri
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.