Literature DB >> 20402719

Perinatal outcomes of women intending to give birth in birth centers in Australia.

Paula J Laws1, Sally K Tracy, Elizabeth A Sullivan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A recent Australian study showed perinatal mortality was lower among women who gave birth in a birth center than in a comparable low-risk group of women who gave birth in a hospital. The current study used the same large population database to investigate whether perinatal outcomes were improved for women intending to give birth in a birth center at the onset of labor, regardless of the actual place of birth.
METHODS: Data were obtained from the National Perinatal Data Collection (NPDC) in Australia. The study included 822,955 mothers who gave birth during the 5-year period, 2001 to 2005, and their 836,919 babies. Of these, 22,222 women (2.7%) intended to give birth in a birth center at the onset of labor. Maternal and perinatal factors and outcomes were compared according to the intended place of birth. Data were not available on congenital anomalies, or cause, or timing of death.
RESULTS: Women intending to give birth in a birth center at the onset of labor had lower rates of intervention and of adverse perinatal outcomes compared with women intending to give birth in a hospital, including less preterm birth and low birthweight. No statistically significant difference was found in perinatal mortality for term babies of mothers intending to give birth in a birth center compared with term babies of low-risk women intending to give birth in a hospital (1.3 per 1,000 births [99% CI = 0.66, 1.95] vs 1.7 per 1,000 births [99% CI = 1.50, 1.80], respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Term babies of women who intended to give birth in a birth center were less likely to be admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit or special care nursery, and no significant difference was found in other perinatal outcomes compared with term babies of low-risk women who intended to give birth in a hospital labor ward. Birth center care remains a viable option for eligible women giving birth at term.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20402719     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00375.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  11 in total

1.  Unexpected complications of low-risk pregnancies in the United States.

Authors:  Valery A Danilack; Anthony P Nunes; Maureen G Phipps
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Physician-led, hospital-linked, birth care centers can decrease cesarean section rates without increasing rates of adverse events.

Authors:  Margaret H O'Hara; Linda M Frazier; Travis W Stembridge; Robert S McKay; Sandra N Mohr; Stuart L Shalat
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.689

3.  The Dutch Birth Centre Study: study design of a programmatic evaluation of the effect of birth centre care in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Marieke A A Hermus; Therese A Wiegers; Marit F Hitzert; Inge C Boesveld; M Elske van den Akker-van Marle; Henk A Akkermans; Marc A Bruijnzeels; Arie Franx; Johanna P de Graaf; Marlies E B Rijnders; Eric A P Steegers; Karin M van der Pal-de Bruin
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  The "Cocoon," first alongside midwifery-led unit within a Belgian hospital: Comparison of the maternal and neonatal outcomes with the standard obstetric unit over 2 years.

Authors:  Karine Welffens; Sara Derisbourg; Elena Costa; Yvon Englert; Axelle Pintiaux; Michèle Warnimont; Christine Kirkpatrick; Pierre Buekens; Caroline Daelemans
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 3.689

5.  Incidence of and risk factors for perineal trauma: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Lesley A Smith; Natalia Price; Vanessa Simonite; Ethel E Burns
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Different settings of place of midwife-led birth: evaluation of a midwife-led birth centre.

Authors:  Jacoba van der Kooy; Johanna P de Graaf; Doctor Erwin Birnie; Semiha Denktas; Eric A P Steegers; Gouke J Bonsel
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-06-18

7.  Differences in optimality index between planned place of birth in a birth centre and alternative planned places of birth, a nationwide prospective cohort study in The Netherlands: results of the Dutch Birth Centre Study.

Authors:  Marieke A A Hermus; Marit Hitzert; Inge C Boesveld; M Elske van den Akker-van Marle; Paula van Dommelen; Arie Franx; Johanna P de Graaf; Jan M M van Lith; Nathalie Luurssen-Masurel; Eric A P Steegers; Therese A Wiegers; Karin M van der Pal-de Bruin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  Developing quality indicators for assessing quality of birth centre care: a mixed- methods study.

Authors:  Inge C Boesveld; Marieke A A Hermus; Hanneke J de Graaf; Marit Hitzert; Karin M van der Pal-de Bruin; Raymond G de Vries; Arie Franx; Therese A Wiegers
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Evaluating Maternity Units: a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwife-led primary maternity units in New Zealand-clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Celia P Grigg; Sally K Tracy; Mark Tracy; Rea Daellenbach; Mary Kensington; Amy Monk; Virginia Schmied
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Mapping the trajectories for women and their babies from births planned at home, in a birth centre or in a hospital in New South Wales, Australia, between 2000 and 2012.

Authors:  Vanessa L Scarf; Rosalie Viney; Serena Yu; Maralyn Foureur; Chris Rossiter; Hannah Dahlen; Charlene Thornton; Seong Leang Cheah; Caroline S E Homer
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.