Literature DB >> 24635500

Physician-led, hospital-linked, birth care centers can decrease cesarean section rates without increasing rates of adverse events.

Margaret H O'Hara1, Linda M Frazier, Travis W Stembridge, Robert S McKay, Sandra N Mohr, Stuart L Shalat.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study compares outcomes at a hospital-linked, physician-led, birthing center to a traditional hospital labor and delivery service.
METHODS: Using de-identified electronic medical records, a retrospective cohort design was employed to evaluate 32,174 singleton births during 1998-2005.
RESULTS: Compared with hospital service, birth care center delivery was associated with a lower rate of cesarean sections (adjusted Relative Risk = 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.59-0.91; p < 0.001) without an increased rate of operative vaginal delivery (adjusted Relative Risk = 1.04, 95% confidence interval 0.97-1.13; p = 0.25) and a higher initiation of breastfeeding (adjusted Relative Risk = 1.28, 95% confidence interval 1.25-1.30; p ≤ 0.001). A maternal length of stay greater than 72 hours occurred less frequently in the birth care center (adjusted Relative Risk = 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.55-0.66; p < 0.001). Comparing only women without major obstetrical risk factors, the differences in outcomes were reduced but not eliminated. Adverse maternal and infant outcomes were not increased at the birth care center.
CONCLUSION: A hospital-linked, physician-led, birth care center has the potential to lower rates of cesarean sections without increasing rates of operative vaginal delivery or other adverse maternal and infant outcomes.
© 2013, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation © 2013, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  birth care center; delivery; hospital-linked; obstetric; physician; pregnancy outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24635500      PMCID: PMC4321785          DOI: 10.1111/birt.12051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  28 in total

1.  Single room maternity care: perinatal outcomes, economic costs,and physician preferences.

Authors:  Susan J Harris; Malcolm D Farren; Patricia A Janssen; Michael C Klein; Shoo K Lee
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2004-07

Review 2.  Outcomes of free-standing, midwife-led birth centers: a structured review.

Authors:  Denis Walsh; Soo M Downe
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.689

3.  The Stockholm birth centre trial: maternal and infant outcome.

Authors:  U Waldenström; C A Nilsson; B Winbladh
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1997-04

4.  Comparisons of outcomes of maternity care by obstetricians and certified nurse-midwives.

Authors:  D Oakley; M E Murray; T Murtland; R Hayashi; H F Andersen; F Mayes; J Rooks
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Birth room transfer and procedure rates--what do they tell about the setting?

Authors:  M Klein; R Westreich
Journal:  Birth       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.689

6.  Epidural and spinal anesthesia use during labor: 27-state reporting area, 2008.

Authors:  Michelle J K Osterman; Joyce A Martin
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2011-04-06

7.  Care in a birth room versus a conventional setting: a controlled trial.

Authors:  M Klein; A Papageorgiou; R Westreich; L Spector-Dunsky; V Elkins; M S Kramer; M M Gelfand
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1984-12-15       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  A free-standing low-risk maternity unit in the United Kingdom: does it have a role?

Authors:  K Reddy; P W Reginald; J E Spring; L Nunn; N Mishra
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.246

9.  Development and experience of a university-based, freestanding birthing center.

Authors:  T J Garite; B J Snell; D L Walker; V C Darrow
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Outcomes of care in birth centers. The National Birth Center Study.

Authors:  J P Rooks; N L Weatherby; E K Ernst; S Stapleton; D Rosen; A Rosenfield
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-12-28       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.