Literature DB >> 20401661

The learning curve in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy: a 1-year retrospective evaluation of a novice and an expert.

David Schilling1, Georgios Gakis, Ute Walcher, Arnulf Stenzl, Udo Nagele.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare a novice surgeon with an expert surgeon independently performing minimally invasive percutaneous neprolitholapaxy (PCNL) excluding the influence of the expert in the learning curve.
METHODS: Clinical records of 84 patients (novice: n = 35; expert: n = 49) undergoing minimally invasive PCNL between 04/2007 and 04/2008 were retrospectively reviewed for the following parameters: drop in hemoglobin, operative and fluoroscopy time, length of hospital stay, stone-free rate and complication rate. Complications were graded according to the Clavien classification. Statistical analysis was carried out by student's t test (Chi-square test) with p < 0.05 considered significant.
RESULTS: The novice surgeon experienced longer median operative and fluoroscopy time, lower stone-free rate and higher re-treatment rate (all p < 0.005) but no longer length of hospital stay (p = 0.19) compared to the experienced surgeon. The novice showed a notable improvement in operating time (p = 0.0208). Altogether, 16 complications occurred in 84 minimally invasive PCNL (19.1%) with five patients (6.0%) encountering grade III complications. Four patients (8.2%) treated by the expert surgeon developed complications (all grade I/II) compared to 12 of the patients (34.3%) treated by the novice surgeon (p = 0.0265). All grade III complications occurred in the first 20 patients of the novice surgeon group.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite longer operating time and a lower initial stone-free rate, the novice showed a significant improvement with growing experience and a low rate of higher grade (≥IIIa) complications. This demonstrates that the concept of minimally invasive PCNL can also be learned by urologists who do not have the support of an experienced colleague without endangering patient safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20401661     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-010-0553-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  13 in total

1.  Prospective randomized study of various techniques of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  M I Feng; K Tamaddon; A Mikhail; J S Kaptein; G C Bellman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Closing the tract of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with gelatine matrix hemostatic sealant can replace nephrostomy tube placement.

Authors:  Udo Nagele; David Schilling; Aristotelis G Anastasiadis; Stefan Corvin; Jörg Seibold; Markus Kuczyk; Arnulf Stenzl; Karl-Dietrich Sievert
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Defining the learning curve for percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Darrell Allen; Tim O'Brien; Richard Tiptaft; Jonathan Glass
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 4.  Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Maurice Stephan Michel; Lutz Trojan; Jens Jochen Rassweiler
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Management of lower-pole stones of 0.8 to 1.5 cm maximal diameter by the minimally invasive percutaneous approach.

Authors:  Udo Nagele; David Schilling; Karl-Dietrich Sievert; Arnulf Stenzl; Markus Kuczyk
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy can be safely performed in the high-risk patient.

Authors:  Sutchin R Patel; George E Haleblian; Gyan Pareek
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  A newly designed amplatz sheath decreases intrapelvic irrigation pressure during mini-percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy: an in-vitro pressure-measurement and microscopic study.

Authors:  Udo Nagele; Marcus Horstmann; Karl-Dietrich Sievert; Markus A Kuczyk; Ute Walcher; Jörg Hennenlotter; Arnulf Stenzl; Aristotelis G Anastasiadis
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified clavien grading system: looking for a standard.

Authors:  Ahmet Tefekli; Mert Ali Karadag; Kadir Tepeler; Erhan Sari; Yalcin Berberoglu; Murat Baykal; Omer Sarilar; Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  [Minimally invasive percutaneous treatment of lower pole stones with a diameter of 8 to 15 millimeters].

Authors:  D Schilling; G Gakis; U Walcher; M Germann; A Stenzl; Udo Nagele
Journal:  Aktuelle Urol       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 0.658

10.  A biological model to teach percutaneous nephrolithotomy technique with ultrasound- and fluoroscopy-guided access.

Authors:  Axel Häcker; Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl; Patrick Honeck; M S Michel; Peter Alken; Thomas Knoll
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.942

View more
  16 in total

1.  Beyond ESWL: new concepts for definitive stone removal.

Authors:  Thomas Knoll; Peter Alken
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  A prospective comparative study of haemodynamic, electrolyte, and metabolic changes during percutaneous nephrolithotomy and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Shuxiong Xu; Hua Shi; Jianguo Zhu; Yuanlin Wang; Ying Cao; Kai Li; Yandong Wang; Zhaolin Sun; Shujie Xia
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Predictors of clinical outcome after minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal calculus.

Authors:  Zhao-Lun Li; Qian Deng; Tie Chong; Peng Zhang; He-Cheng Li; Hong-Liang Li; Hai-Wen Chen; Wei-Min Gan
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 4.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: technique.

Authors:  Thomas Knoll; Francisco Daels; Janak Desai; Andras Hoznek; Bodo Knudsen; Emanuele Montanari; Cesare Scoffone; Andreas Skolarikos; Keiichi Tozawa
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  A comparison of Amplatz dilators and metal dilators for tract dilatation in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Burak Arslan; Mehmet Fatih Akbulut; Ozkan Onuk; Onur Küçüktopçu; Nusret Can Çilesiz; Arif Ozkan; Gökhan Yazıcı
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Prevention and treatment of septic shock following mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a single-center retrospective study of 834 cases.

Authors:  Chunlai Liu; Xiling Zhang; Yili Liu; Ping Wang
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery and shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Stephan Kruck; Aristoteles G Anastasiadis; Thomas R W Herrmann; Ute Walcher; Mohamed F Abdelhafez; André P Nicklas; Lillian Hölzle; David Schilling; Jens Bedke; Arnulf Stenzl; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Iason Kyriazis; Vasilios Panagopoulos; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Mehmet Özsoy; Marinos Vasilas; Evangelos Liatsikos
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-09-14       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Costs variations for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the U.S. from 2003-2015: A contemporary analysis of an all-payer discharge database.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Leow; Anne-Sophie Valiquette; Benjamin I Chung; Steven L Chang; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Rus Korets; Naeem Bhojani
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  Adopting Ultrasound Guidance for Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Evaluating the Learning Curve for the Experienced Surgeon.

Authors:  Manint Usawachintachit; Selma Masic; Isabel E Allen; Jianxing Li; Thomas Chi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 2.942

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.