Literature DB >> 18811465

Management of lower-pole stones of 0.8 to 1.5 cm maximal diameter by the minimally invasive percutaneous approach.

Udo Nagele1, David Schilling, Karl-Dietrich Sievert, Arnulf Stenzl, Markus Kuczyk.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2008        PMID： 18811465     DOI： 10.1089/end.2008.9791

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN： 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


× No keyword cloud information.
  14 in total

1.  The hydrodynamic basis of the vacuum cleaner effect in continuous-flow PCNL instruments: an empiric approach and mathematical model.

Authors:  R Mager; C Balzereit; K Gust; T Hüsch; T Herrmann; U Nagele; A Haferkamp; D Schilling
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  A comparison of Amplatz dilators and metal dilators for tract dilatation in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Burak Arslan; Mehmet Fatih Akbulut; Ozkan Onuk; Onur Küçüktopçu; Nusret Can Çilesiz; Arif Ozkan; Gökhan Yazıcı
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery and shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Stephan Kruck; Aristoteles G Anastasiadis; Thomas R W Herrmann; Ute Walcher; Mohamed F Abdelhafez; André P Nicklas; Lillian Hölzle; David Schilling; Jens Bedke; Arnulf Stenzl; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Minituriazed percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what does it mean?

Authors:  W Kamal; P Kallidonis; I Kyriazis; E Liatsikos
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus miniaturized PNL for solitary renal calculi of 10-30 mm size.

Authors:  Thomas Knoll; Jan Peter Jessen; Patrick Honeck; Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Implementation of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MIP): comparison of the initial learning curve with the later on clinical routine in a tertiary centre.

Authors:  T Bergmann; T R W Herrmann; Th Schiller; U Zimmermann; M Burchardt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  The learning curve in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy: a 1-year retrospective evaluation of a novice and an expert.

Authors:  David Schilling; Georgios Gakis; Ute Walcher; Arnulf Stenzl; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  The feasibility of shockwave lithotripsy for treating solitary, lower calyceal stones over 1 cm in size.

Authors:  Tae Beom Kim; Sang Cheol Lee; Khae Hawn Kim; Han Jung; Sang Jin Yoon; Jin Kyu Oh
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of smaller than 15 mm.

Authors:  Mustafa Kirac; Ömer Faruk Bozkurt; Lutfi Tunc; Cagri Guneri; Ali Unsal; Hasan Biri
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy under combined sonographic/radiologic guided puncture: results of a learning curve using the modified Clavien grading system.

Authors:  Jan Peter Jessen; Patrick Honeck; Thomas Knoll; Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 4.226
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.