Literature DB >> 20400215

Tibial acceleration variability during consecutive gait cycles is influenced by the menstrual cycle.

Ross A Clark1, Simon Bartold, Adam L Bryant.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relationship between the phases of the menstrual cycle and injury risk remains unclear. Neuromuscular function may be compromised during menstruation, which could result in reduced cyclicality of movement patterns. We hypothesize that mediolateral (varus/valgus) knee acceleration during running gait will possess increased variability during menstruation when compared to approximately ovulation in women who do not take the monophasic oral contraceptive pill (MOCP).
METHODS: Thirty-six women (18 MOCP users: MOCP group and 18 non-pill users: NP group) performed six-minute treadmill running trials at 10 km h(-1) with an accelerometer fixed to the proximal tibia. Trials were performed at menstruation and approximately equal ovulation (for the MOCP group at a similar stage of the cycle) in a randomized order. The cyclicality of gross mediolateral tibial acceleration during 15 consecutive strides was assessed using combined wavelet and autocorrelation analysis. Longitudinal and anteroposterior accelerations were also examined. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests were performed to assess differences at each stage of the menstrual cycle (alpha=0.05).
FINDINGS: Gross mediolateral acceleration in the NP group had significantly (P=0.022) increased variability at the time of menstruation compared to approximately equal ovulation, and was also significantly (P=0.011) more variable than the MOCP group at the corresponding time point. No significant difference was observed for any measure in the MOCP group.
INTERPRETATION: Increased variability in the NP users at menstruation may be a result of compromised motor control strategies. This provides further evidence of variability in performance and motor control during menstruation, and may have implications for a female athlete's risk of injury. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20400215     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  6 in total

1.  Estrogen-induced effects on the neuro-mechanics of hopping in humans.

Authors:  Adam L Bryant; Kay M Crossley; Simon Bartold; Erik Hohmann; Ross A Clark
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  The use of wearable inertial motion sensors in human lower limb biomechanics studies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Daniel Tik-Pui Fong; Yue-Yan Chan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  The Effect of the Accelerometer Operating Range on Biomechanical Parameters: Stride Length, Velocity, and Peak Tibial Acceleration during Running.

Authors:  Christian Mitschke; Pierre Kiesewetter; Thomas L Milani
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Inertial Sensor Estimation of Initial and Terminal Contact during In-Field Running.

Authors:  Yue Yang; Li Wang; Steven Su; Mark Watsford; Lauren Marie Wood; Rob Duffield
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 5.  The Specificities of Elite Female Athletes: A Multidisciplinary Approach.

Authors:  Carole Castanier; Valérie Bougault; Caroline Teulier; Christelle Jaffré; Sandrine Schiano-Lomoriello; Nancy Vibarel-Rebot; Aude Villemain; Nathalie Rieth; Christine Le-Scanff; Corinne Buisson; Katia Collomp
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-26

Review 6.  Is This the Real Life, or Is This Just Laboratory? A Scoping Review of IMU-Based Running Gait Analysis.

Authors:  Lauren C Benson; Anu M Räisänen; Christian A Clermont; Reed Ferber
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.576

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.