Literature DB >> 20398768

Cortical mechanisms underlying stretch reflex adaptation to intention: a combined EEG-TMS study.

L Spieser1, H B Meziane, M Bonnard.   

Abstract

During voluntary motor acts, potential perturbations due to transient external forces are counteracted very quickly by short- and long-latency stretch reflexes (SLSR and LLSR, respectively). The LLSR, presumably linked to a transcortical loop, can be modulated by the subjects' intention. Here, we used combined TMS-EEG to study cortical mechanisms involved in this intention-related modulation both before and during the reaction to a mechanical perturbation. Subjects had to prepare for a brisk wrist extension under the instruction either to 'resist' the perturbation or to 'let-go'. Following the perturbation, the early cortical evoked activity (45-75 ms) was greater in the 'let-go' condition; moreover, its amplitude was negatively correlated with the LLSR amplitude, regardless of condition. After 100 ms the pattern reversed, the late evoked activity (presumably linked to the voluntary reaction) was greater in the 'resist' condition. The early and late evoked activities also differed in their topography. Therefore, the cortical mechanisms involved in the intention-related LLSR modulation differ from those involved in the voluntary reaction. In addition, in response to a single-pulse TMS delivered during the expectation of the mechanical perturbation, the TMS-evoked N100 amplitude decreased when subjects intended to 'let-go', suggesting anticipatory decreased activity of intracortical inhibitory sensorimotor networks. Taken together, these results support the idea that anticipatory processes preset the sensorimotor cortex so as to adapt its early reaction to the perturbation relative to the subjects' intention. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20398768     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  13 in total

1.  Assessing cortical network properties using TMS-EEG.

Authors:  Nigel C Rogasch; Paul B Fitzgerald
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Targeting the Cerebellum by Noninvasive Neurostimulation: a Review.

Authors:  Kim van Dun; Florian Bodranghien; Mario Manto; Peter Mariën
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Using voluntary motor commands to inhibit involuntary arm movements.

Authors:  Arko Ghosh; John Rothwell; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Influence of kinesthetic motor imagery and effector specificity on the long-latency stretch response.

Authors:  Christopher J Forgaard; Ian M Franks; Dana Maslovat; Romeo Chua
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  TMS evoked N100 reflects local GABA and glutamate balance.

Authors:  Xiaoming Du; Laura M Rowland; Ann Summerfelt; Andrea Wijtenburg; Joshua Chiappelli; Krista Wisner; Peter Kochunov; Fow-Sen Choa; L Elliot Hong
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  N100 as a generic cortical electrophysiological marker based on decomposition of TMS-evoked potentials across five anatomic locations.

Authors:  Xiaoming Du; Fow-Sen Choa; Ann Summerfelt; Laura M Rowland; Joshua Chiappelli; Peter Kochunov; L Elliot Hong
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Insights on the neural basis of motor plasticity induced by theta burst stimulation from TMS-EEG.

Authors:  Marine Vernet; Shahid Bashir; Woo-Kyoung Yoo; Jennifer M Perez; Umer Najib; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Local Differences in Cortical Excitability - A Systematic Mapping Study of the TMS-Evoked N100 Component.

Authors:  Daniela Roos; Lea Biermann; Tomasz A Jarczok; Stephan Bender
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Monitoring cortical excitability during repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in children with ADHD: a single-blind, sham-controlled TMS-EEG study.

Authors:  Christian Helfrich; Simone S Pierau; Christine M Freitag; Jochen Roeper; Ulf Ziemann; Stephan Bender
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Primary motor cortex and fast feedback responses to mechanical perturbations: a primer on what we know now and some suggestions on what we should find out next.

Authors:  J Andrew Pruszynski
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.