Literature DB >> 33732105

Local Differences in Cortical Excitability - A Systematic Mapping Study of the TMS-Evoked N100 Component.

Daniela Roos1, Lea Biermann1, Tomasz A Jarczok1, Stephan Bender1.   

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with simultaneous electroencephalography applied to the primary motor cortex provides two parameters for cortical excitability: motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs). This study aimed to evaluate the effects of systematic coil shifts on both the TEP N100 component and MEPs in addition to the relationship between both parameters. In 12 healthy adults, the center of a standardized grid was fixed above the hot spot of the target muscle of the left primary motor cortex. Twelve additional positions were arranged in a quadratic grid with positions between 5 and 10 mm from the hot spot. At each of the 13 positions, TMS single pulses were applied. The topographical maximum of the resulting N100 was located ipsilateral and slightly posterior to the stimulation site. A source analysis revealed an equivalent dipole localized more deeply than standard motor cortex coordinates that could not be explained by a single seeded primary motor cortex dipole. The N100 topography might not only reflect primary motor cortex activation, but also sum activation of the surrounding cortex. N100 amplitude and latency decreased significantly during stimulation anterior-medial to the hot spot although MEP amplitudes were smaller at all other stimulation sites. Therefore, N100 amplitudes might be suitable for detecting differences in local cortical excitability. The N100 topography, with its maximum located posterior to the stimulation site, possibly depends on both anatomical characteristics of the stimulated cortex and differences in local excitability of surrounding cortical areas. The less excitable anterior cortex might contribute to a more posterior maximum. There was no correlation between N100 and MEP amplitudes, but a single-trial analysis revealed a trend toward larger N100 amplitudes in trials with larger MEPs. Thus, functionally efficient cortical excitation might increase the probability of higher N100 amplitudes, but TEPs are also generated in the absence of MEPs.
Copyright © 2021 Roos, Biermann, Jarczok and Bender.

Entities:  

Keywords:  N100; TMS-EEG study; cortical excitability; motor cortex mapping; relationship N100 and MEP

Year:  2021        PMID: 33732105      PMCID: PMC7959732          DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.623692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Neurosci        ISSN: 1662-453X            Impact factor:   4.677


  67 in total

1.  Architectonics of the human cerebral cortex and transmitter receptor fingerprints: reconciling functional neuroanatomy and neurochemistry.

Authors:  K Zilles; N Palomero-Gallagher; C Grefkes; F Scheperjans; C Boy; K Amunts; A Schleicher
Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.600

2.  Electroencephalographic response to transcranial magnetic stimulation in children: Evidence for giant inhibitory potentials.

Authors:  Stephan Bender; Kristine Basseler; Imke Sebastian; Franz Resch; Thomas Kammer; Rieke Oelkers-Ax; Matthias Weisbrod
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 10.422

3.  Excitation threshold of the motor cortex estimated with transcranial magnetic stimulation electroencephalography.

Authors:  Soile Komssi; Petri Savolainen; Juha Heiskala; Seppo Kähkönen
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2007-01-08       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 4.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a primer.

Authors:  Mark Hallett
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Development of cortical motor circuits between childhood and adulthood: A navigated TMS-HdEEG study.

Authors:  Sara Määttä; Mervi Könönen; Elisa Kallioniemi; Timo Lakka; Niina Lintu; Virpi Lindi; Florinda Ferreri; David Ponzo; Laura Säisänen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  TMS evoked N100 reflects local GABA and glutamate balance.

Authors:  Xiaoming Du; Laura M Rowland; Ann Summerfelt; Andrea Wijtenburg; Joshua Chiappelli; Krista Wisner; Peter Kochunov; Fow-Sen Choa; L Elliot Hong
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  Shared neural substrates controlling hand movements in human motor cortex.

Authors:  J N Sanes; J P Donoghue; V Thangaraj; R R Edelman; S Warach
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-06-23       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The spectral features of EEG responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex depend on the amplitude of the motor evoked potentials.

Authors:  Matteo Fecchio; Andrea Pigorini; Angela Comanducci; Simone Sarasso; Silvia Casarotto; Isabella Premoli; Chiara-Camilla Derchi; Alice Mazza; Simone Russo; Federico Resta; Fabio Ferrarelli; Maurizio Mariotti; Ulf Ziemann; Marcello Massimini; Mario Rosanova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The influence of corticospinal activity on TMS-evoked activity and connectivity in healthy subjects: A TMS-EEG study.

Authors:  Sara Petrichella; Nessa Johnson; Bin He
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Monitoring cortical excitability during repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in children with ADHD: a single-blind, sham-controlled TMS-EEG study.

Authors:  Christian Helfrich; Simone S Pierau; Christine M Freitag; Jochen Roeper; Ulf Ziemann; Stephan Bender
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Changes in the TMS-evoked potential N100 in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex as a function of depression severity in adolescents.

Authors:  Lea Biermann; Heidrun Lioba Wunram; Lena Pokorny; Eva Breitinger; Nicola Großheinrich; Tomasz Antoni Jarczok; Stephan Bender
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 3.850

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.