BACKGROUND: For patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), the European Guidelines for Breast Imaging recommends magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to be performed before start of NACT, when half of the NACT has been administered and prior to surgery. This is the first study addressing the value of flow-insensitive apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) obtained from diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI at the recommended time points for pretreatment prediction and monitoring of treatment response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five LABC patients were included in this prospective study. DW MRI was performed using single-shot spin-echo echo-planar imaging with b-values of 100, 250 and 800 s/mm(2) prior to NACT, after four cycles of NACT and at the conclusion of therapy using a 1.5 T MR scanner. ADC in the breast tumor was calculated from each assessment. The strength of correlation between pretreatment ADC, ADC changes and tumor volume changes were examined using Spearman's rho correlation test. RESULTS: Mean pretreatment ADC was 1.11 + or - 0.21 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s. After 4 cycles of NACT, ADC was significantly increased (1.39 + or - 0.36 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s; p=0.018). There was no correlation between individual pretreatment breast tumor ADC and MR response measured after four cycles of NACT (p=0.816) or prior to surgery (p=0.620). CONCLUSION: Pretreatment tumor ADC does not predict treatment response for patients with LABC undergoing NACT. Furthermore, ADC increase observed mid-way in the course of NACT does not correlate with tumor volume changes.
BACKGROUND: For patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), the European Guidelines for Breast Imaging recommends magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to be performed before start of NACT, when half of the NACT has been administered and prior to surgery. This is the first study addressing the value of flow-insensitive apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) obtained from diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI at the recommended time points for pretreatment prediction and monitoring of treatment response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five LABC patients were included in this prospective study. DW MRI was performed using single-shot spin-echo echo-planar imaging with b-values of 100, 250 and 800 s/mm(2) prior to NACT, after four cycles of NACT and at the conclusion of therapy using a 1.5 T MR scanner. ADC in the breast tumor was calculated from each assessment. The strength of correlation between pretreatment ADC, ADC changes and tumor volume changes were examined using Spearman's rho correlation test. RESULTS: Mean pretreatment ADC was 1.11 + or - 0.21 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s. After 4 cycles of NACT, ADC was significantly increased (1.39 + or - 0.36 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s; p=0.018). There was no correlation between individual pretreatment breast tumorADC and MR response measured after four cycles of NACT (p=0.816) or prior to surgery (p=0.620). CONCLUSION: Pretreatment tumorADC does not predict treatment response for patients with LABC undergoing NACT. Furthermore, ADC increase observed mid-way in the course of NACT does not correlate with tumor volume changes.
Authors: Xia Li; Richard G Abramson; Lori R Arlinghaus; Hakmook Kang; Anuradha Bapsi Chakravarthy; Vandana G Abramson; Jaime Farley; Ingrid A Mayer; Mark C Kelley; Ingrid M Meszoely; Julie Means-Powell; Ana M Grau; Melinda Sanders; Thomas E Yankeelov Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Shigeto Ueda; Darren Roblyer; Albert Cerussi; Amanda Durkin; Anais Leproux; Ylenia Santoro; Shanshan Xu; Thomas D O'Sullivan; David Hsiang; Rita Mehta; John Butler; Bruce J Tromberg Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2012-07-09 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Francesco Mungai; Filippo Pasquinelli; Lorenzo Nicola Mazzoni; Gianni Virgili; Alfonso Ragozzino; Emilio Quaia; Giovanni Morana; Andrea Giovagnoni; Luigi Grazioli; Stefano Colagrande Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2014-01-10 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Xia Li; Hakmook Kang; Lori R Arlinghaus; Richard G Abramson; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Vandana G Abramson; Jaime Farley; Melinda Sanders; Thomas E Yankeelov Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2014-02-01 Impact factor: 4.243
Authors: David C Newitt; Zheng Zhang; Jessica E Gibbs; Savannah C Partridge; Thomas L Chenevert; Mark A Rosen; Patrick J Bolan; Helga S Marques; Sheye Aliu; Wen Li; Lisa Cimino; Bonnie N Joe; Heidi Umphrey; Haydee Ojeda-Fournier; Basak Dogan; Karen Oh; Hiroyuki Abe; Jennifer Drukteinis; Laura J Esserman; Nola M Hylton Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2018-10-22 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Renu M Stephen; Abhinav K Jha; Denise J Roe; Theodore P Trouard; Jean-Philippe Galons; Matthew A Kupinski; Georgette Frey; Haiyan Cui; Scott Squire; Mark D Pagel; Jeffrey J Rodriguez; Robert J Gillies; Alison T Stopeck Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-08-15 Impact factor: 2.546