PURPOSE: Determine cosmetic outcome and toxicity profile of intraoperative radiation delivered before tumor excision for patients with early-stage breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients age 48 or older with ultrasound-visible invasive ductal cancers <3 cm and clinically negative lymph nodes were eligible for treatment on this institutional review board-approved Phase II clinical trial. Treatment planning ultrasound was used to select an electron energy and cone size sufficient to cover the tumor plus a 1.5- to 2.0-cm circumferential margin laterally and a 1-cm-deep margin with the 90% isodose line. The dose was prescribed to a nominal 15 Gy and delivered using a Mobetron electron irradiator before tumor excision by segmental mastectomy. Physician- and patient-assessed cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction were determined by questionnaire. RESULTS: From March 2003 to July 2007, 71 patients were treated with intraoperative radiation therapy. Of those, 56 patients were evaluable, with a median follow-up of 3.1 years (minimum 1 year). Physician and patient assessment of cosmesis was "good or excellent" (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group cosmesis scale) in 45/56 (80%) and 32/42 (76%) of all patients, respectively. Eleven patients who received additional whole breast radiation had similar rates of good or excellent cosmesis: 40/48 (83%) and 29/36 (81%), respectively). Grade 1 or 2 acute toxicities were seen in 4/71 (6%) patients. No Grade 3 or 4 toxicities or serious adverse events have been seen. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative radiotherapy delivered to an in situ tumor is feasible with acceptable acute tolerance. Patient and physician assessment of the cosmetic outcome is good to excellent. Copyright Â
PURPOSE: Determine cosmetic outcome and toxicity profile of intraoperative radiation delivered before tumor excision for patients with early-stage breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients age 48 or older with ultrasound-visible invasive ductal cancers <3 cm and clinically negative lymph nodes were eligible for treatment on this institutional review board-approved Phase II clinical trial. Treatment planning ultrasound was used to select an electron energy and cone size sufficient to cover the tumor plus a 1.5- to 2.0-cm circumferential margin laterally and a 1-cm-deep margin with the 90% isodose line. The dose was prescribed to a nominal 15 Gy and delivered using a Mobetron electron irradiator before tumor excision by segmental mastectomy. Physician- and patient-assessed cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction were determined by questionnaire. RESULTS: From March 2003 to July 2007, 71 patients were treated with intraoperative radiation therapy. Of those, 56 patients were evaluable, with a median follow-up of 3.1 years (minimum 1 year). Physician and patient assessment of cosmesis was "good or excellent" (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group cosmesis scale) in 45/56 (80%) and 32/42 (76%) of all patients, respectively. Eleven patients who received additional whole breast radiation had similar rates of good or excellent cosmesis: 40/48 (83%) and 29/36 (81%), respectively). Grade 1 or 2 acute toxicities were seen in 4/71 (6%) patients. No Grade 3 or 4 toxicities or serious adverse events have been seen. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative radiotherapy delivered to an in situ tumor is feasible with acceptable acute tolerance. Patient and physician assessment of the cosmetic outcome is good to excellent. Copyright Â
Authors: J S Mandelblatt; J Hadley; J F Kerner; K A Schulman; K Gold; J Dunmore-Griffith; S Edge; E Guadagnoli; J J Lynch; N J Meropol; J C Weeks; R Winn Journal: Cancer Date: 2000-08-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Frank A Vicini; Peter Chen; Michelle Wallace; Christina Mitchell; Yasmin Hasan; Inga Grills; Larry Kestin; Scott Schell; Neal S Goldstein; Jonathan Kunzman; Sam Gilbert; Alvaro Martinez Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-11-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: K L Baglan; A A Martinez; R C Frazier; V R Kini; L L Kestin; P Y Chen; G Edmundson; E Mele; D Jaffray; F A Vicini Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2001-07-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: J S Vaidya; M Baum; J S Tobias; D P D'Souza; S V Naidu; S Morgan; M Metaxas; K J Harte; A P Sliski; E Thomson Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: K Kenneth Chao; Frank A Vicini; Michelle Wallace; Christina Mitchell; Peter Chen; Michel Ghilezan; Samuel Gilbert; Jonathan Kunzman; Pamela Benitez; Alvaro Martinez Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-04-30 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Randall J Kimple; Nancy Klauber-DeMore; Cherie M Kuzmiak; Dag Pavic; Jun Lian; Chad A Livasy; WingKeung M Chiu; Dominic T Moore; Carolyn I Sartor; David W Ollila Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Noam A Vanderwalde; Ellen L Jones; Randall J Kimple; Dominic T Moore; Nancy Klauber-Demore; Carolyn I Sartor; David W Ollila Journal: Cancer Date: 2013-01-29 Impact factor: 6.860