Literature DB >> 10931455

Patterns of breast carcinoma treatment in older women: patient preference and clinical and physical influences.

J S Mandelblatt1, J Hadley, J F Kerner, K A Schulman, K Gold, J Dunmore-Griffith, S Edge, E Guadagnoli, J J Lynch, N J Meropol, J C Weeks, R Winn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Older women have high rates of breast carcinoma, and there are substantial variations in the patterns of care for this population group.
METHODS: The authors studied 718 breast carcinoma patients age 67 years and older who were diagnosed with localized disease between 1995 and 1997 from 29 hospitals in 5 regions. Data were collected from patients, charts, and surgeons. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate determinants of treatment.
RESULTS: Women who were concerned about body image were 1.8 times more likely (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.1-2.8) to receive breast conservation surgery and radiotherapy than women without this preference, controlling for other factors. In contrast, women who preferred receiving no therapy beyond surgery were 3.9 times more likely (95% CI, 2.9-6.1) to undergo mastectomy than other women, after considering other factors. Radiotherapy was omitted after breast conservation 3.4 times more often (95% CI, 2.0-5.6) among women age 80 years and older than among women ages 67-79 years, controlling for covariates. Black women tended to have radiotherapy omitted after breast conservation surgery 2.0 times more often (95% CI, 0.9-4.4) than white women (P = 0.09). Women age 80 years and older also were 70% less likely (odds ratio = 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-0.8) to receive chemotherapy than women ages 67-79 years, controlling for health, functional status, and other covariates.
CONCLUSIONS: After considering other factors, patient preferences and age were found to be associated with breast carcinoma treatment patterns in older women. Further research and training are needed to provide care for the growing population of older women that is both clinically appropriate and consonant with a woman's preferences. Copyright 2000 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10931455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  56 in total

1.  Is mastectomy overused? A call for an expanded research agenda.

Authors:  Paula V Lantz; Judith K Zemencuk; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  What is the utilization of the SAGES guidelines by its members?

Authors:  Dimitrios Stefanidis; William S Richardson; Robert D Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Older women's experience with breast cancer treatment decisions.

Authors:  Mara A Schonberg; Robyn L Birdwell; Brittany L Bychkovsky; Lindsay Hintz; Valerie Fein-Zachary; Michael D Wertheimer; Rebecca A Silliman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Factors noted to affect breast cancer treatment decisions of women aged 80 and older.

Authors:  Mara A Schonberg; Rebecca A Silliman; Ellen P McCarthy; Edward R Marcantonio
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  The roles of teaching hospitals, insurance status, and race/ethnicity in receipt of adjuvant therapy for regional-stage breast cancer in Florida.

Authors:  Lisa C Richardson; Lili Tian; Lydia Voti; Abraham G Hartzema; Isildinha Reis; Lora E Fleming; Jill Mackinnon
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-11-29       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  The effect of age, race and gender on preference scores for hypothetical health states.

Authors:  Eve Wittenberg; Elkan Halpern; Nomia Divi; Lisa A Prosser; Sally S Araki; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Satisfaction with surgery outcomes and the decision process in a population-based sample of women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Paula M Lantz; Nancy K Janz; Angela Fagerlin; Kendra Schwartz; Lihua Liu; Indu Lakhani; Barbara Salem; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Predictors and outcomes of completion axillary node dissection among older breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Sara H Javid; Hao He; Larissa A Korde; David R Flum; Benjamin O Anderson
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Variations in Guideline-Concordant Breast Cancer Adjuvant Therapy in Rural Georgia.

Authors:  Gery P Guy; Joseph Lipscomb; Theresa W Gillespie; Michael Goodman; Lisa C Richardson; Kevin C Ward
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Relationships between personal beliefs and treatment acceptability, and preferences for behavioral treatments.

Authors:  Souraya Sidani; Joyal Miranda; Dana R Epstein; Richard R Bootzin; Jennifer Cousins; Patricia Moritz
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2009-06-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.