Nicolas -Xavier Bonne1, Rabih Aboukais2, Marc Baroncini2, Audrey Hochart3, Pierre Leblond3, Franck Broly4,5, Frédérique Dubrulle6, Jean-Paul Lejeune2, Christophe Vincent7. 1. Department of Otology and Neurotology, CHRU de Lille, 59037, Lille, France. nicolas.bonne@chru-lille.fr. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, CHRU de Lille, 59037, Lille Cedex, France. 3. Department of Pediatric Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, 59000, Lille, France. 4. Department of Genetic, CHRU de Lille, Lille Cedex, France. 5. Service de Toxicologie, Génopathies, CHRU Lille, Lille, France. 6. Department of Radiology, Hôpital Huriez, CHRU Lille, Lille, France. 7. Department of Otology and Neurotology, CHRU de Lille, 59037, Lille, France.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe the clinical and molecular presentation of pediatric neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) and the subsequent management of vestibular schwannomas (VS) and hearing rehabilitation. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective study of neurofibromatosis type 2 diagnosed before the age of 18 years old from 1997. Natural history of vestibular schwannomas and surgical outcomes were evaluated using volumetric MRI, hearing, and facial nerve assessment. Patients included in chemotherapy protocols were excluded. RESULTS: From a database of 80 patients followed up for NF2 on a regular basis, 25 patients were eligible (11 sporadic cases, 14 inherited in five families). The mean age at diagnosis was 11.6 years old. The average clinical follow-up was 6.5 years. NF2 mutation was identified in 81 % of the probands. The average growth rate based on the maximum linear diameter (DGR) was 1.68 mm/year (n = 33, average follow-up 4.22 years) and 545 mm3/year in volumetric assessment (VGR) for VS larger than 1 cm (n = 21, average follow-up 3.4 years). In unoperated ears, hearing was stable in about 50 % of ears. The mean change in dB HL was 9.5 dB/year for pure-tone average and 3.5 for speech-recognition threshold (n = 34, 5.5 years 1-12). Eight children required removal through a translabyrinthine approach (mean follow-up was 4.5 years), six patients were operated on for hearing preservation (mean postoperative follow-up 4.3 years). Six patients were eligible for hearing rehabilitation with cochlear implantation (I), and five received placement of an auditory brainstem implant. CONCLUSION: Early diagnosis and treatment of small growing VS should be carefully discussed considering familial history and possible rehabilitation with a CI.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe the clinical and molecular presentation of pediatric neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) and the subsequent management of vestibular schwannomas (VS) and hearing rehabilitation. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective study of neurofibromatosis type 2 diagnosed before the age of 18 years old from 1997. Natural history of vestibular schwannomas and surgical outcomes were evaluated using volumetric MRI, hearing, and facial nerve assessment. Patients included in chemotherapy protocols were excluded. RESULTS: From a database of 80 patients followed up for NF2 on a regular basis, 25 patients were eligible (11 sporadic cases, 14 inherited in five families). The mean age at diagnosis was 11.6 years old. The average clinical follow-up was 6.5 years. NF2 mutation was identified in 81 % of the probands. The average growth rate based on the maximum linear diameter (DGR) was 1.68 mm/year (n = 33, average follow-up 4.22 years) and 545 mm3/year in volumetric assessment (VGR) for VS larger than 1 cm (n = 21, average follow-up 3.4 years). In unoperated ears, hearing was stable in about 50 % of ears. The mean change in dB HL was 9.5 dB/year for pure-tone average and 3.5 for speech-recognition threshold (n = 34, 5.5 years 1-12). Eight children required removal through a translabyrinthine approach (mean follow-up was 4.5 years), six patients were operated on for hearing preservation (mean postoperative follow-up 4.3 years). Six patients were eligible for hearing rehabilitation with cochlear implantation (I), and five received placement of an auditory brainstem implant. CONCLUSION: Early diagnosis and treatment of small growing VS should be carefully discussed considering familial history and possible rehabilitation with a CI.
Authors: M Ruggieri; P Iannetti; A Polizzi; I La Mantia; A Spalice; O Giliberto; N Platania; A L Gabriele; V Albanese; L Pavone Journal: Neuropediatrics Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 1.947
Authors: J A Trofatter; M M MacCollin; J L Rutter; J R Murrell; M P Duyao; D M Parry; R Eldridge; N Kley; A G Menon; K Pulaski Journal: Cell Date: 1993-11-19 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: D E Brackmann; J N Fayad; W H Slattery; R A Friedman; J D Day; W E Hitselberger; R M Owens Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: D Gareth R Evans; R T Ramsden; A Shenton; C Gokhale; N L Bowers; S M Huson; G Pichert; A Wallace Journal: J Med Genet Date: 2007-02-16 Impact factor: 6.318
Authors: William H Slattery; Laurel M Fisher; William Hitselberger; Rick A Friedman; Derald E Brackmann Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Alvin T deTorres; Carmen C Brewer; Chris K Zalewski; Kelly A King; Robert Walker; Gretchen C Scott; Ashok R Asthagiri; Prashant Chittiboina; Hung Jeffrey Kim Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 2.311