Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is widely applied for estimating body fat. The percentage of body mass as fat (%fat) is predicted from a DXA-estimated R(ST) value defined as the ratio of soft tissue attenuation at two photon energies (e.g., 40 keV and 70 keV). Theoretically, the R(ST) concept depends on the mass of each major element in the human body. The DXA R(ST) values, however, have never been fully evaluated by measured human elemental composition. The present investigation evaluated the DXA R(ST) value by the total body mass of 11 major elements and the DXA %fat by the five-component (5C) model, respectively. Six elements (i.e. C, N, Na, P, Cl and Ca) were measured by in vivo neutron activation analysis, and potassium (i.e. K) by whole-body (40)K counting in 27 healthy adults. Models were developed for predicting the total body mass of four additional elements (i.e. H, O, Mg and S). The elemental content of soft tissue, after correction for bone mineral elements, was used to predict the R(ST) values. The DXA R(ST) values were strongly associated with the R(ST) values predicted from elemental content (r = 0.976, P < 0.001), although there was a tendency for the elemental-predicted R(ST) to systematically exceed the DXA-measured R(ST) (mean +/- SD, 1.389 +/- 0.024 versus 1.341 +/- 0.024). DXA-estimated %fat was strongly associated with 5C %fat (24.4 +/- 12.0% versus 24.9 +/- 11.1%, r = 0.983, P < 0.001). DXA R(ST) is evaluated by in vivo elemental composition, and the present study supports the underlying physical concept and accuracy of the DXA method for estimating %fat.
Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is widely applied for estimating body fat. The percentage of body mass as fat (%fat) is predicted from a DXA-estimated R(ST) value defined as the ratio of soft tissue attenuation at two photon energies (e.g., 40 keV and 70 keV). Theoretically, the R(ST) concept depends on the mass of each major elen class="Species">ment inpan> the pan> class="Species">human body. The DXA R(ST) values, however, have never been fully evaluated by measured human elemental composition. The present investigation evaluated the DXA R(ST) value by the total body mass of 11 major elements and the DXA %fat by the five-component (5C) model, respectively. Six elements (i.e. C, N, Na, P, Cl and Ca) were measured by in vivo neutron activation analysis, and potassium (i.e. K) by whole-body (40)K counting in 27 healthy adults. Models were developed for predicting the total body mass of four additional elements (i.e. H, O, Mg and S). The elemental content of soft tissue, after correction for bone mineral elements, was used to predict the R(ST) values. The DXA R(ST) values were strongly associated with the R(ST) values predicted from elemental content (r = 0.976, P < 0.001), although there was a tendency for the elemental-predicted R(ST) to systematically exceed the DXA-measured R(ST) (mean +/- SD, 1.389 +/- 0.024 versus 1.341 +/- 0.024). DXA-estimated %fat was strongly associated with 5C %fat (24.4 +/- 12.0% versus 24.9 +/- 11.1%, r = 0.983, P < 0.001). DXA R(ST) is evaluated by in vivo elemental composition, and the present study supports the underlying physical concept and accuracy of the DXA method for estimating %fat.
Authors: ZiMian Wang; F Xavier Pi-Sunyer; Donald P Kotler; Lucian Wielopolski; Robert T Withers; Richard N Pierson; Steven B Heymsfield Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Aviva B Sopher; John C Thornton; Jack Wang; Richard N Pierson; Steven B Heymsfield; Mary Horlick Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Timothy R Ackland; Timothy G Lohman; Jorunn Sundgot-Borgen; Ronald J Maughan; Nanna L Meyer; Arthur D Stewart; Wolfram Müller Journal: Sports Med Date: 2012-03-01 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Sergio Setsuo Maeda; Barbara Santarosa Emo Peters; Lígia Araújo Martini; Hannah Karen Moreira Antunes; Maria Cristina Gonzalez; Henrique Pierotti Arantes; Carla M Prado; Camila Lemos Pinto; Iana Mizumukai de Araújo; Francisco José Albuquerque de Paula; Joao Lindolfo Cunha Borges; Ben-Hur Albergaria; Marcela Ushida; Guilherme Cardenaz de Souza; Laura Maria Carvalho de Mendonça; Mirley do Prado; Marcelo de Medeiros Pinheiro Journal: Adv Rheumatol Date: 2022-03-20
Authors: Gabrielle Turner-McGrievy; Sara Wilcox; Edward A Frongillo; Angela Murphy; Brent Hutto; Kim Williams; Anthony Crimarco; Mary Wilson; Marty Davey Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2019-11-16 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Marcello Maggio; Francesca De Vita; Fulvio Lauretani; Gian Paolo Ceda; Elena Volpi; Francesco Giallauria; Giuseppe De Cicco; Chiara Cattabiani; Håkan Melhus; Karl Michaëlsson; Tommy Cederholm; Lars Lind Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Nan Li; Yun Liu; George D Papandonatos; Antonia M Calafat; Charles B Eaton; Karl T Kelsey; Kim M Cecil; Heidi J Kalkwarf; Kimberly Yolton; Bruce P Lanphear; Aimin Chen; Joseph M Braun Journal: Environ Int Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 9.621