Literature DB >> 20393105

Epidemiology of giant retinal tears in the United Kingdom: the British Giant Retinal Tear Epidemiology Eye Study (BGEES).

Ghee Soon Ang1, John Townend, Noemi Lois.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of giant retinal tear (GRT) in the United Kingdom and to provide epidemiologic data, clinical characteristics, treatment methods, and short-term outcomes in affected and fellow eyes.
METHODS: Patients with a newly developed GRT (90 degrees or greater in circumferential extent associated with posterior vitreous detachment) were identified prospectively over a 13-month period (January 2007-January 2008, inclusive) by active surveillance through the British Ophthalmic Surveillance Unit. Questionnaire-based data were obtained from reporting ophthalmologists at baseline and 12 months.
RESULTS: Sixty patients (62 eyes) developed a new GRT, giving a U.K. annual incidence of 0.094 (95% CI 0.072-0.120) cases or 0.091 (95% CI 0.069-0.117) patients per 100,000. The GRTs were mostly idiopathic (54.8%), affected middle-aged (mean, 42.2 years), white British (93.3%) males (71.7%), with presenting vision worse than 20/40 in 59.7%, foveal detachment in 45.2%, and proliferative vitreoretinopathy of grade C (PVR-C) or worse in 11.3%. Treatment in most was managed by pars plana vitrectomy (93.5%) with laser retinopexy (52.5%) and silicone oil endotamponade (75.8%). Prophylactic 360 degrees laser or cryotherapy was applied to 39.0% of the fellow eyes. At mean follow-up of 11.3 months, eventual retinal reattachment was attained in 94.7%, although only 42.1% achieved vision of >or=20/40. Neither GRT nor RD developed in any of the 19 nontraumatic, noniatrogenic, prophylactically treated fellow eyes.
CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first population-based prospective effort to evaluate the epidemiology of GRT. Although only a minority presented with PVR-C and high retinal reattachment rates were achieved, fewer than half had vision sufficient for driving in the GRT eye.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20393105     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-5036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  17 in total

1.  Outcome of surgery in patients with giant retinal tear: 10 years experience.

Authors:  K Ghasemi Falavarjani; S A Alemzadeh; M Modarres; S A Alemzadeh; M M Parvarash; M Naseripour; M Hashemi; M Robatmeili
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 2.  Management of Giant Retinal Tear Detachments.

Authors:  Maria H Berrocal; Megan L Chenworth; Luis A Acaba
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

3.  Silicone oil versus gas tamponade for giant retinal tear-associated fovea-sparing retinal detachment: a comparison of outcome.

Authors:  P J Banerjee; A Chandra; P Petrou; D G Charteris
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Management of giant retinal tears with vitrectomy and perfluorocarbon liquid postoperatively as a short-term tamponade.

Authors:  M A Mikhail; G Mangioris; R M Best; S McGimpsey; W C Chan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Management of a unique case of post-traumatic posterior giant retinal tear and macular hole-associated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Authors:  Ramanuj Samanta; Gitanjli Sood; Shalaka R Waghamare; Raghavendra R Mareguddi; Sanjeev K Mittal; Ajai Agrawal
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.848

6.  The incidence of unexplained visual loss following removal of silicone oil.

Authors:  R Moya; A Chandra; P J Banerjee; D Tsouris; N Ahmad; D G Charteris
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Contemporary Management of Complex and Non-Complex Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Due to Giant Retinal Tears.

Authors:  Katie X Li; Nicholas Carducci; Omar Moinuddin; Yunshu Zhou; David C Musch; David N Zacks; Cagri G Besirli; Thomas J Wubben
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-08

8.  Pars plana vitrectomy combined with scleral buckle versus pars plana vitrectomy for giant retinal tear.

Authors:  Mario Gutierrez; Jose L Rodriguez; Diego Zamora-de La Cruz; Mariana Aracely Flores Pimentel; Aida Jimenez-Corona; Linda C Novak; Rene Cano Hidalgo; Federico Graue
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-12-16

Review 9.  Galectins in the Pathogenesis of Common Retinal Disease.

Authors:  Bruna Caridi; Dilyana Doncheva; Sobha Sivaprasad; Patric Turowski
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 5.810

10.  Giant retinal tears after prior pars plana vitrectomy: management strategies and outcomes.

Authors:  Marco A Gonzalez; Harry W Flynn; William E Smiddy; Thomas A Albini; Audina M Berrocal; Paul Tenzel
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-08-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.