R Moya1,2, A Chandra1, P J Banerjee1, D Tsouris1, N Ahmad1,3, D G Charteris1. 1. Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. 2. Fundación Oftalmológica Los Andes, Santiago, Chile. 3. Sheffield Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the incidence and clinical features of unexpected visual loss after removal of silicone oil (ROSO). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional observational study of 421 consecutive eyes, which underwent silicone oil removal at one institution over a 2-year period. RESULTS: Fourteen (3.3%) patients, (12 male, mean age of 53.1 years) suffered unexplained visual loss. In these eyes, the mean duration of silicone oil fill was 141 days (range 76-218). The mean loss of visual acuity was 3.7 (range 2-6) Snellen lines (SL) at 1 month, 3.5 (2-6) SL at 3 months and 2.91 (0-6) SL at 6 months. The change from preoperative visual acuity was statistically significant at all visits (P=0.02). Subgroup analysis of 20 fovea-sparing giant retinal tear (GRT) detachments, observed 10 (50%) cases of visual loss after ROSO. Electrodiagnostic testing suggested predominantly macular dysfunction, with optic nerve involvement in one case. Five of the 14 cases had variable recovery of vision. CONCLUSION: There is a 3.3% overall incidence of visual loss following ROSO with a high rate (50%) observed in maculae on GRT detachments. Although recovery of visual acuity is seen in a minority of cases, visual loss after ROSO remains a serious and unexplained concern for vitreoretinal surgeons.
PURPOSE: To assess the incidence and clinical features of unexpected visual loss after removal of silicone oil (ROSO). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional observational study of 421 consecutive eyes, which underwent silicone oil removal at one institution over a 2-year period. RESULTS: Fourteen (3.3%) patients, (12 male, mean age of 53.1 years) suffered unexplained visual loss. In these eyes, the mean duration of silicone oil fill was 141 days (range 76-218). The mean loss of visual acuity was 3.7 (range 2-6) Snellen lines (SL) at 1 month, 3.5 (2-6) SL at 3 months and 2.91 (0-6) SL at 6 months. The change from preoperative visual acuity was statistically significant at all visits (P=0.02). Subgroup analysis of 20 fovea-sparing giant retinal tear (GRT) detachments, observed 10 (50%) cases of visual loss after ROSO. Electrodiagnostic testing suggested predominantly macular dysfunction, with optic nerve involvement in one case. Five of the 14 cases had variable recovery of vision. CONCLUSION: There is a 3.3% overall incidence of visual loss following ROSO with a high rate (50%) observed in maculae on GRT detachments. Although recovery of visual acuity is seen in a minority of cases, visual loss after ROSO remains a serious and unexplained concern for vitreoretinal surgeons.
Authors: Richard S B Newsom; Robert Johnston; Paul M Sullivan; G Bill Aylward; Graham E Holder; Zdenek J Gregor Journal: Retina Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Amy M Sheridan; Rohan W Essex; Jonathan Yeoh; Penelope Allen; William G Campbell; Thomas L Edwards Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2018-12-07 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Katie X Li; Nicholas Carducci; Omar Moinuddin; Yunshu Zhou; David C Musch; David N Zacks; Cagri G Besirli; Thomas J Wubben Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Date: 2021-03-08