Literature DB >> 20393077

Is Canadian women's breast cancer screening behaviour associated with having a family doctor?

Barbara Poole1, Charlyn Black, Karen Gelmon, Lisa Kan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether regular care from a family physician is associated with regular participation in screening mammography.
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the 2006 Canadian Community Health Survey data.
SETTING: Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional sample of 15 195 Canadian women aged 50 to 69 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome of interest was screening mammography within the past 2 years; the key explanatory factor was active interaction with a family physician. Control factors included sociodemographic characteristics, other cancer screening behaviour, and other cancer risk habits.
RESULTS: Active interaction with a regular family doctor doubled the odds that a woman had received a recent screening mammogram. Other cancer screening and preventive measures were also strongly associated with that outcome. A woman who had had a recent Papanicolaou test was more than 3 times as likely to have had a recent mammogram; nonsmokers were much more likely to have had a recent mammogram than smokers.
CONCLUSION: Adults who receive regular care from family physicians are more likely to participate in screening mammography within the recommended time frames.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20393077      PMCID: PMC2860842     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  13 in total

1.  Predictors of mammography use among Canadian women aged 50-69: findings from the 1996/97 National Population Health Survey.

Authors:  C J Maxwell; C M Bancej; J Snider
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-02-06       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  The influence of breast self-examination on subsequent mammography participation.

Authors:  Susan E Jelinski; Colleen J Maxwell; Jay Onysko; Christina M Bancej
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Baseline predictors of initiation vs. maintenance of regular mammography use among rural women.

Authors:  Garth H Rauscher; Sarah Tropman Hawley; Jo Anne L Earp
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Robust description of family practice. A look at the National Physician Survey.

Authors:  Nick Busing; Peter Newbery
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Family practice a tough sell.

Authors:  Wayne Kondro
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Cervical cancer screening in rural NSW: Health Insurance Commission data compared to self-report.

Authors:  L Hancock; R Sanson-Fisher; L Kentish
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.939

7.  Factors associated with women's adherence to mammography screening guidelines.

Authors:  K A Phillips; K Kerlikowske; L C Baker; S W Chang; M L Brown
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Breast cancer screening by mammography: utilization and associated factors.

Authors:  J G Zapka; A M Stoddard; M E Costanza; H L Greene
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Does having regular care by a family physician improve preventive care?

Authors:  W J McIsaac; E Fuller-Thomson; Y Talbot
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Factors associated with perceived risk of breast cancer among women attending a screening program.

Authors:  S W Vernon; V G Vogel; S Halabi; M L Bondy
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.872

View more
  8 in total

1.  Association Between Recency of Immigration and Mammography Uptake: Results from a Canadian National Survey.

Authors:  Prince A Adu; U Vivian Ukah; Sheena D Palmer
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2017-02

2.  Examining screening mammography participation among women aged 40 to 74.

Authors:  Karena D Volesky; Paul J Villeneuve
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Mammography use for breast cancer screening in Portugal: results from the 2005/2006 National Health Survey.

Authors:  Fernanda Dourado; Helena Carreira; Nuno Lunet
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.367

4.  Association between continuity and access in primary care: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Lisa L Cook; Richard P Golonka; Charles M Cook; Robin L Walker; Peter Faris; Shannon Spenceley; Richard Lewanczuk; Robert Wedel; Rebecca Love; Cheryl Andres; Susan D Byers; Tim Collins; Scott Oddie
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2020-11-16

5.  Correlates of non-adherence to breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening among screen-eligible women: a population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Mandana Vahabi; Aisha K Lofters; Alexander Kopp; Richard H Glazier
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  'Getting shut down and shut out': Exploring ACB patient perceptions on healthcare access at the physician-patient level in Canada.

Authors:  Tiyondah Fante-Coleman; Ciann L Wilson; Ruth Cameron; Todd Coleman; Robb Travers
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2022-12

7.  Breast cancer screening disparities among urban immigrants: a population-based study in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Mandana Vahabi; Aisha Lofters; Matthew Kumar; Richard H Glazier
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Breast screening participation and retention among immigrants and nonimmigrants in British Columbia: A population-based study.

Authors:  Ryan R Woods; Kimberlyn M McGrail; Erich V Kliewer; Arminee Kazanjian; Colin Mar; Lisa Kan; Janette Sam; John J Spinelli
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 4.452

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.