Literature DB >> 20393067

The influence of the consistency of postsaccadic visual errors on saccadic adaptation.

Katharina Havermann1, Markus Lappe.   

Abstract

The saccadic system is a prime example of motor control without continuous visual feedback. These systems suffer from a strong vulnerability against disturbances. The mechanism of saccadic adaptation allows adjustment of saccades to alterations arising not only from anatomical changes but also from external changes. The weighting of errors according to their reliability provides a strong benefit for an optimized control system. Thus the consistency of visual error should influence the characteristics of adaptation. In the typical adaptation paradigm a visual error is introduced by stepping the target during the saccade by a given amount. In this paradigm, the retinal error varies with the accuracy of the saccade and the step size. To study the influence of error consistency we use a variant of the adaptation paradigm which allows to specify a constant error size. Intrasaccadic target step sizes were calculated with respect to the predicted landing position of each individual saccade. The consistency of the visual error was varied by introducing different levels of noise to the intrasaccadic target step. Different mean intrasaccadic target step sizes were examined: positive target step, negative target step, and a condition in which the mean of the error distribution was clamped to the fovea. In all three conditions saccadic adaptation was strongest when the error was consistent and became weaker as the error became more variable. These results show that saccadic adaptation takes not only the average error but also the consistency of the error into account.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20393067     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00970.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  24 in total

1.  The relative importance of retinal error and prediction in saccadic adaptation.

Authors:  Thérèse Collins; Josh Wallman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Reinforcing saccadic amplitude variability.

Authors:  Céline Paeye; Laurent Madelain
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Modification of saccadic gain by reinforcement.

Authors:  Laurent Madelain; Céline Paeye; Josh Wallman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Saccade adaptation goes for the goal.

Authors:  Laurent Madelain; James P Herman; Mark R Harwood
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Fine-scale plasticity of microscopic saccades.

Authors:  Katharina Havermann; Claudia Cherici; Michele Rucci; Markus Lappe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Saccadic adaptation to a systematically varying disturbance.

Authors:  Carlos R Cassanello; Sven Ohl; Martin Rolfs
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Sensorimotor adaptation error signals are derived from realistic predictions of movement outcomes.

Authors:  Aaron L Wong; Mark Shelhamer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Short-term adaptations of the dynamic disparity vergence and phoria systems.

Authors:  Eun H Kim; Vincent R Vicci; Bérangère Granger-Donetti; Tara L Alvarez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Saccade adaptation as a model of flexible and general motor learning.

Authors:  James P Herman; Annabelle Blangero; Laurent Madelain; Afsheen Khan; Mark R Harwood
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 3.467

10.  Revisiting corrective saccades: role of visual feedback.

Authors:  Jing Tian; Howard S Ying; David S Zee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.