Literature DB >> 20387082

Development and validation of a modified fecal incontinence quality of life scale for Japanese patients after intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer.

Hideki Hashimoto1, Hiroyuki Shiokawa, Kimihiko Funahashi, Norio Saito, Toshio Sawada, Kazuo Shirouzu, Kazutaka Yamada, Kenichi Sugihara, Toshiaki Watanabe, Akira Sugita, Akira Tsunoda, Shigeki Yamaguchi, Tatsuo Teramoto.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Fecal incontinence is a frequently observed symptom after lower rectal surgery with sphincter manipulation. The aim of this study was to evaluate a proposed modification to the fecal incontinence quality of life (FIQL) scale for the assessment of the quality of life among patients with very low rectal cancer who have undergone intersphincteric resection.
METHODS: A single 14-item composite scale was prepared that was derived from items in the "Lifestyle" and "Coping" subscales of the original FIQL. The scale was tested with a convenience sample of 152 postoperative patients. In addition to classic psychometric evaluation, newer statistical techniques, such as a multiple correspondence analysis and partial credit model, were performed to evaluate the item response patterns.
RESULTS: The proposed scale exhibited an item-rest correlation of 0.66-0.84 and a Cronbach's alpha of 0.96, and was correlated with concurrently measured Social Functioning subscale of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (-0.70), physical role limitation (-0.61), and Wexner continence grading scale (-0.61). Multiple correspondence analysis supported a uni-dimensional construct, and the partial credit model showed a varying yet overlapping range of item response thresholds across items. Several items, such as "Locating bathroom whenever going out", reflected more a serious condition than items such as "Avoiding eating-out." Weighted item scores based on estimated thresholds provided results comparable with those based on non-weighted scores.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed modification to the FIQL scale exhibited high internal consistency and satisfactory concurrent and convergence validity. The modified scale is practical to administer and is sensitive to a range of functional problems associated with fecal incontinence among patients who have undergone intersphincteric resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20387082     DOI: 10.1007/s00535-010-0239-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0944-1174            Impact factor:   7.527


  19 in total

1.  Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence.

Authors:  T H Rockwood; J M Church; J W Fleshman; R L Kane; C Mavrantonis; A G Thorson; S D Wexner; D Bliss; A C Lowry
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Translation, adaptation, and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Japan.

Authors:  S Fukuhara; S Bito; J Green; A Hsiao; K Kurokawa
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement.

Authors:  Maria Orlando Edelen; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Etiology and management of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  J M Jorge; S D Wexner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Intersphincteric resection in patients with very low rectal cancer: a review of the Japanese experience.

Authors:  Norio Saito; Yoshihiro Moriya; Kazuo Shirouzu; Koutarou Maeda; Hidetaka Mochizuki; Keiji Koda; Takashi Hirai; Masanori Sugito; Masaaki Ito; Akihiro Kobayashi
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Comparison of quality of life in patients undergoing abdominoperineal extirpation or anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  M M Grumann; E M Noack; I A Hoffmann; P M Schlag
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Incontinence severity and QOL scales for fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Todd H Rockwood
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  The hospital anxiety and depression scale.

Authors:  A S Zigmond; R P Snaith
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 6.392

9.  Does incontinence severity correlate with quality of life? Prospective analysis of 502 consecutive patients.

Authors:  L Bordeianou; T Rockwood; N Baxter; A Lowry; A Mellgren; S Parker
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 3.788

10.  Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Reza Chamlou; Yann Parc; Tabassome Simon; Malika Bennis; Nidal Dehni; Rolland Parc; Emmanuel Tiret
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  17 in total

1.  Hand-assisted hybrid laparoscopic-robotic total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch--anal anastomosis.

Authors:  Luca Morelli; Simone Guadagni; Maria Donatella Mariniello; Niccolò Furbetta; Roberta Pisano; Cristiano D'Isidoro; Giovanni Caprili; Emanuele Marciano; Giulio Di Candio; Ugo Boggi; Franco Mosca
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life questionnaire.

Authors:  Haruka Nomura; Takeshi Agatsuma; Toshiki Mimura
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 3.  Robotic versus laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julie Flynn; Jose T Larach; Joseph C H Kong; Satish K Warrier; Alexander Heriot
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Translation and validation of the Japanese version of the fecal incontinence quality of life scale.

Authors:  Akira Tsunoda; Kazutaka Yamada; Nobuyasu Kano; Masahiro Takano
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-11-11       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 5.  Measuring symptoms in gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review of assessment instruments.

Authors:  Rachelle Pullmer; Wolfgang Linden; Katerina Rnic; Andrea Vodermaier
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Transvaginal resection of a rectal leiomyoma: A case report.

Authors:  Nobuhisa Matsuhashi; Takao Takahashi; Kengo Ichikawa; Toshiyuki Tanahashi; Yoshiyuki Sasaki; Yoshihiro Tanaka; Naoki Okumura; Kazuya Yamaguchi; Shinji Osada; Kazuhiro Yoshida
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Evaluation of the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQL) using item response theory reveals limitations and suggests revisions.

Authors:  Alexander C Peterson; Jason M Sutherland; Guiping Liu; R Trafford Crump; Ahmer A Karimuddin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 8.  Intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yoshito Akagi; Tetsushi Kinugasa; Kazuo Shirouzu
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Robotic surgery contributes to the preservation of bowel and urinary function after total mesorectal excision: comparisons with transanal and conventional laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Takuya Miura; Yoshiyuki Sakamoto; Hajime Morohashi; Akiko Suto; Shunsuke Kubota; Aika Ichisawa; Daisuke Kuwata; Takahiro Yamada; Hiroaki Tamba; Shuntaro Matsumoto; Kenichi Hakamada
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.030

10.  Quality of life in rectal cancer patients after radical surgery: a survey of Chinese patients.

Authors:  Xinxin Li; Xinming Song; Zhihui Chen; Mingzhe Li; Lifeng Lu; Ying Xu; Wenhua Zhan; Yulong He; Kaiwu Xu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.